View Article

Abstract

Butea monosperma, a medicinally significant plant species within the Fabaceae family, has been extensively utilized in traditional healthcare systems across the Indian subcontinent. This investigation systematically evaluates the phytochemical constituents present in leaf extracts of B. monosperma through qualitative analytical methods. Fresh leaf specimens were collected from Ranchi, Jharkhand, India, and subjected to sequential extraction using five solvents of varying polarities: petroleum ether, benzene, chloroform, ethanol and distilled water. Phytochemical screening detected the presence of tannins, saponins, reducing sugars, phenolic compounds, alkaloids, terpenoids, and flavonoids across different solvent systems. The ethanol extract demonstrated the broadest spectrum of phytochemical diversity, yielding positive results for all seven tested compound classes. Conversely, the benzene extract showed positive reactions in six categories, with saponins being absent. These findings substantiate the ethnopharmacological applications of B. monosperma and provide empirical evidence supporting its traditional therapeutic uses. The diverse array of bioactive secondary metabolites identified warrants further pharmacological investigation to elucidate specific mechanisms of action and potential clinical applications in contemporary medicine.

Keywords

Butea monosperma, phytochemical screening, secondary metabolites, solvent extraction, traditional medicine, Fabaceae

Introduction

× Popup Image

Natural product chemistry continues to serve as a fundamental resource for drug discovery and development, with traditional medicinal plants offering a vast repository of bioactive compounds [1, 2]. Butea monosperma (Lam.) Taub, commonly designated as 'Flame of the Forest' or 'dhak', represents a botanically and medicinally significant species within the Fabaceae family [3]. This deciduous tree exhibits widespread distribution throughout the Indian subcontinent, including regions of Burma and Ceylon, with its natural range extending to the northwestern Himalayan zones near Jhelum, excluding hyper-arid environments [4]. The species has maintained prominence in traditional healing systems, particularly within Ayurvedic, Unani, and homeopathic medical frameworks, where various plant organs are employed therapeutically [5, 6]. Ethnobotanical documentation indicates that root preparations address helminthic infections, night blindness, hemorrhoids, ulcerative conditions, and neoplastic growths [7]. Floral components demonstrate astringent, diuretic, and depurative properties, while bark preparations are traditionally applied to gastrointestinal disorders, ulcerations, and envenomation cases [8]. Beyond medicinal applications, B. monosperma possesses considerable economic value. Leaves are processed into biodegradable food service items and tobacco wrappers, bark fibers contribute to cordage manufacturing, and wood serves multiple purposes including construction materials and pulp production for paper manufacturing [9]. Additionally, the tree functions as a host for Laccifer lacca, the insect species responsible for natural lac production [10]. Preliminary phytochemical investigations have identified numerous bioactive constituents within different plant tissues, including triterpenic compounds, glycosidic structures, tannins, enzymatic proteins, ester linkages, fatty acid chains, amino acid sequences, and steroidal frameworks [11, 12]. Pharmacological evaluations have demonstrated anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, hepatoprotective, anticonvulsant, antihyperglycemic, antimicrobial, and antineoplastic activities [13, 14, 15]. Despite extensive ethnopharmacological utilization, comprehensive phytochemical profiling studies employing standardized analytical protocols remain limited. The present investigation addresses this knowledge gap by conducting systematic qualitative phytochemical screening of B. monosperma leaf extracts prepared using solvents of varying polarities, thereby establishing a foundational chemical profile for subsequent pharmacological research.

Fig. 1. Butea Monosperma leaf

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

2.1 Collection and Authentication of Plant Material

Fresh leaf specimens of Butea monosperma were harvested from the campus premises of Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India (geographic coordinates: 23°29'18.47"N, 85°24'28.73"E) during the vegetative growth phase. Botanical identification and taxonomic authentication were conducted at the Acharya Jagadish Chandra Bose Indian Botanic Garden (formerly Shibpur Botanical Garden), West Bengal, India, by qualified taxonomists. Following collection, leaf specimens underwent gentle washing with potable water to remove surface contaminants, followed by air-drying under shade conditions at ambient temperature to preserve thermolabile constituents.

2.2 Chemicals and Reagents

All chemical reagents employed in this investigation were of analytical grade purity and procured from authenticated suppliers through Sai Nath University. The extraction solvents included petroleum ether, benzene, chloroform, absolute ethanol, and double-distilled water. Phytochemical detection reagents comprised ferric chloride, Benedict's reagent, silver chloride, mercuric chloride, concentrated sulfuric acid, sodium hydroxide, magnesium sulfate, hydrochloric acid, Mayer's reagent, Kedde's reagent, and alkaline reagent solution. Stock solutions were prepared at a concentration of 1 mg/mL by dissolution in appropriate solvents, with subsequent dilutions performed according to experimental requirements.

2.3 Preparation of Plant Extracts

Dried leaf material was mechanically pulverized using an electric blender to obtain a fine powder with enhanced surface area for optimal solvent penetration. Fifty grams of powdered leaf material was subjected to sequential maceration extraction using solvents arranged in order of increasing polarity: petroleum ether, benzene, chloroform, ethanol, and distilled water. The maceration procedure was conducted over a 25-day period at room temperature with periodic agitation to facilitate mass transfer. Following extraction, each solvent fraction was concentrated under reduced pressure using rotary evaporation techniques to remove volatile solvents while preserving heat-sensitive compounds. Concentrated extracts were transferred to sterile, airtight amber-colored containers and stored under refrigeration at 4°C until phytochemical analysis.

2.4 Qualitative Phytochemical Screening

Standardized qualitative analytical protocols were implemented to detect the presence of major phytochemical classes within each solvent extract [16, 17]. The following tests were conducted:

2.4.1 Detection of Tannins (Ferric Chloride Test): Extract solutions were treated with 5% aqueous ferric chloride solution. Formation of dark greenish-black coloration indicated tannin presence.

2.4.2 Detection of Saponins (Foam Test): Extract samples were vigorously agitated with distilled water in test tubes. Persistent foam formation exceeding 1 cm height for 15 minutes indicated saponin content.

2.4.3 Detection of Reducing Sugars (Benedict's Test): Extract aliquots were mixed with Benedict's reagent and heated in a water bath. Development of green, yellow, orange, or brick-red precipitate indicated reducing sugar presence.

2.4.4 Detection of Phenolic Compounds (Legal's Reagent Test): Extracts were treated with Legal's reagent. Appearance of dark greenish coloration confirmed phenolic compound presence.

2.4.5 Detection of Alkaloids (Mayer's Test): Acidified extract solutions were treated with Mayer's reagent (potassium mercuric iodide solution). Formation of cream-colored precipitate indicated alkaloid presence.

2.4.6 Detection of Terpenoids (Salkowski Test): Extract samples were mixed with chloroform and concentrated sulfuric acid. Development of reddish-brown coloration at the interface indicated terpenoid presence.

2.4.7 Detection of Flavonoids (Alkaline Reagent Test): Extract solutions were treated with dilute sodium hydroxide solution. Formation of intense yellow coloration that disappeared upon acidification indicated flavonoid presence.

2.4.8 Detection of Glycosides (Kedde's Reagent Test): Extracts were treated with Kedde's reagent. Color development would indicate cardiac glycoside presence.

RESULTS

Qualitative phytochemical screening of B. monosperma leaf extracts revealed diverse secondary metabolite profiles across the five solvent systems examined (Table 1). Each solvent extract demonstrated positive reactions for at least six of the seven phytochemical classes investigated, indicating substantial chemical diversity within the leaf tissue. The ethanol extract exhibited the most comprehensive phytochemical profile, showing positive results for all seven tested compound categories: tannins, saponins, reducing sugars, phenolic compounds, alkaloids, terpenoids, and flavonoids. The petroleum ether and chloroform extracts similarly demonstrated positive reactions across all seven screening tests, suggesting effective extraction of both polar and non-polar constituents. The aqueous extract yielded positive results for six phytochemical classes, with all tests except glycoside detection showing positive reactions. The benzene extract also demonstrated six positive outcomes, with saponins being the only compound class not detected in this fraction. Notably, cardiac glycosides were not detected in any of the five solvent extracts examined, as evidenced by negative results in the Kedde's reagent test across all extraction systems.

Table 1: Qualitative Phytochemical Profile of Butea monosperma Leaf Extracts

Phytochemical Class

Aqueous

Ethanol

Petroleum Ether

Chloroform

Benzene

Detection Method

Positive Indicator

Tannins

+

+

+

+

+

Ferric chloride

Dark greenish-black color

Saponins

+

+

+

+

Foam test

Persistent foam

Reducing sugars

+

+

+

+

+

Benedict's test

Green color formation

Phenolic compounds

+

+

+

+

+

Legal's reagent

Dark greenish color

Alkaloids

+

+

+

+

+

Mayer's test

Cream precipitate

Terpenoids

+

+

+

+

+

Salkowski test

Reddish-brown color

Flavonoids

+

+

+

+

+

Alkaline reagent

Yellow color

Cardiac glycosides

Kedde's reagent

No reaction observed

Note: (+) indicates presence; (−) indicates absence

Fig. 2 Standard extract of B. monosperma

Fig. 3 Test for Tannins

Fig. 4 Test for Saponins

Fig. 5 Test for Reducing sugar

Fig. 6 Test for Alkaloids

Fig. 7 Test for Terpenoids

Fig. 8 Test for Flavonoids

Fig. 9 Test for Phenolic compounds

Fig. 10 Test for glycosides (No result)

DISCUSSION:

The present investigation provides systematic evidence for the diverse phytochemical composition of B. monosperma leaf tissue, corroborating its extensive ethnopharmacological applications. The detection of multiple bioactive secondary metabolite classes across different solvent systems supports the traditional medicinal uses documented in classical Ayurvedic and Unani texts.

  • Alkaloids: The presence of alkaloids in all tested extracts is pharmacologically significant, as these nitrogen-containing compounds exhibit diverse biological activities including antimicrobial, antioxidant, analgesic, antimalarial, and central nervous system modulatory effects [18]. Alkaloids represent promising candidates for anti-inflammatory, anticancer, and neuroprotective therapeutic development.
  • Flavonoids: Universal detection of flavonoids across all solvent extracts aligns with the known anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties of B. monosperma. Flavonoids demonstrate antiproliferative effects against cancer cell lines through multiple mechanisms including cell cycle arrest, apoptosis induction, and antiangiogenic activity [19].
  • Phenolic Compounds and Tannins: The consistent presence of phenolic compounds and tannins across all extracts substantiates the antioxidant capacity of B. monosperma. These compounds function as free radical scavengers and metal chelators, potentially contributing to hepatoprotective effects and cellular protection against oxidative stress-induced damage [20].
  • Saponins: Detection of saponins in four of five solvent systems (absent only in benzene extract) is notable given the documented antitumor, immunomodulatory, and hypocholesterolemic properties of these glycosidic compounds. Saponins warrant further investigation regarding their potential role in cancer chemoprevention and treatment.
  • Terpenoids: The universal presence of terpenoids across all extraction systems is consistent with the broad therapeutic applications of these compounds, which include antifungal, anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antibacterial, and anticancer activities. Terpenoids represent a structurally diverse class with significant pharmaceutical potential.
  • Reducing Sugars: The detection of reducing sugars in all extracts may correlate with potential hypoglycemic effects, as these compounds could modulate pancreatic insulin secretion or glucose metabolism pathways.
  • Absence of Cardiac Glycosides: The negative results for cardiac glycoside detection across all solvent systems suggest that B. monosperma leaves do not contain significant quantities of these cardioactive compounds, which is consistent with the absence of traditional use for cardiac conditions.

The superior performance of ethanol as an extraction solvent, yielding positive results for all seven phytochemical classes, can be attributed to its intermediate polarity, enabling extraction of both hydrophilic and lipophilic constituents. This finding supports the traditional preparation methods employing hydroalcoholic solvents in Ayurvedic formulations.

CONCLUSION:

This systematic phytochemical investigation demonstrates that B. monosperma leaf tissue contains a diverse array of bioactive secondary metabolites with established pharmacological significance. The ethanol extract exhibited the most comprehensive phytochemical profile, supporting its preferential use in traditional medicine systems. The presence of alkaloids, flavonoids, phenolic compounds, tannins, saponins, terpenoids, and reducing sugars provides empirical justification for the ethnopharmacological applications of this species. These findings establish a foundational chemical profile that should guide subsequent research directions, including isolation and structural characterization of individual compounds, quantitative phytochemical analysis, in vitro bioactivity screening, in vivo pharmacological evaluation, and toxicological assessment. Further investigations employing advanced analytical techniques such as high-performance liquid chromatography, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy are warranted to elucidate the complete chemical fingerprint of B. monosperma and facilitate its integration into evidence-based phytotherapy protocols.

REFERENCES

  1. Newman, D. J., & Cragg, G. M. (2020). Natural products as sources of new drugs over the nearly four decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019. Journal of Natural Products, 83(3), 770-803.
  2. Atanasov, A. G., Zotchev, S. B., Dirsch, V. M., & Supuran, C. T. (2021). Natural products in drug discovery: advances and opportunities. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 20(3), 200-216.
  3. Sindhia, V. R., & Bairwa, R. (2010). Plant review: Butea monosperma. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, 2(2), 90-94.
  4. Yadav, S., Patgiri, B. J., & Prajapati, P. K. (2015). Review of bio-active principles of Butea monosperma (Lam.) Kuntze. Indian Journal of Ethno-Pharmacology, 1, 45-51.
  5. Sharma, P. C., Yelne, M. B., & Dennis, T. J. (2005). Database on medicinal plants used in Ayurveda (Vol. 3). Central Council for Research in Ayurveda and Siddha, Department of Indian Systems of Medicine and Homoeopathy, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.
  6. Nadkarni, K. M., & Nadkarni, A. K. (1976). Indian Materia Medica (Vol. 1). Popular Prakashan Private Limited, Mumbai.
  7. Kewlani, N. (2012). A comparative pharmacognostical, phytochemical and in vitro anthelmintic activity of Palasha (Butea monosperma Lam.) Beeja and Pravala. Doctoral dissertation, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, India.
  8. Parashar, B., & Dhamija, H. K. (2012). Botanical, phytochemical and biological investigation of Butea monosperma (Lam.) Kuntze. Pharmacognosy Reviews, 6(11), 40-44.
  9. [Orwa, C., Mutua, A., Kindt, R., Jamnadass, R., & Simons, A. (2009). Agroforestree Database: a tree reference and selection guide. Version 4.0. World Agroforestry Centre ICRAF, Nairobi, Kenya.
  10. Jaiswal, A. K., & Bhattacharya, A. (2002). Lac cultivation in India. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.
  11. Maurya, R., & Srivastava, S. (2011). Constituents of Butea monosperma leaves. Indian Journal of Chemistry, 50B, 1673-1676.
  12. Somani, R., Kasture, S., & Singhai, A. K. (2006). Hypoglycemic, antihyperglycemic and antioxidant activity of Butea monosperma Lam. leaves in normal and alloxan induced diabetic rats. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 106(2), 192-197.
  13. Sehrawat, A., Khan, T. H., Prasad, L., & Sultana, S. (2006). Butea monosperma and chemo modulation: protective role against thioacetamide-mediated hepatic alterations in Wistar rats. Phytomedicine, 13(3), 157-163.
  14. Kasture, V. S., Kasture, S. B., Chopde, C. T., & Deshmukh, V. K. (2000). Anticonvulsant and behavioral actions of Butea monosperma in laboratory animals. Indian Journal of Pharmacology, 32(4), 233-236.
  15. Rajesh, R., Raghavendra Gowda, C. D., & Nataraju, A. (2009). Effect of Butea monosperma stem bark methanolic extract on local and systemic effects induced by Naja naja venom. Journal of Natural Remedies, 9(2), 194-201.
  16. Harborne, J. B. (1998). Phytochemical methods: A guide to modern techniques of plant analysis (3rd ed.). Chapman and Hall, London.
  17. Trease, G. E., & Evans, W. C. (2002). Pharmacognosy (15th ed.). Saunders Publishers, London.
  18. Tiwari, P., Kumar, B., Kaur, M., Kaur, G., & Kaur, H. (2011). Phytochemical screening and extraction: a review. Internationale Pharmaceutical Sciencia, 1(1), 98-106.
  19. Panche, A. N., Diwan, A. D., & Chandra, S. R. (2016). Flavonoids: an overview. Journal of Nutritional Science, 5, e47.
  20. Badhani, B., Sharma, N., & Kakkar, R. (2015). Gallic acid: a versatile antioxidant with promising therapeutic and industrial applications. RSC Advances, 5(35), 27540-27557.

Reference

  1. Newman, D. J., & Cragg, G. M. (2020). Natural products as sources of new drugs over the nearly four decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019. Journal of Natural Products, 83(3), 770-803.
  2. Atanasov, A. G., Zotchev, S. B., Dirsch, V. M., & Supuran, C. T. (2021). Natural products in drug discovery: advances and opportunities. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 20(3), 200-216.
  3. Sindhia, V. R., & Bairwa, R. (2010). Plant review: Butea monosperma. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research, 2(2), 90-94.
  4. Yadav, S., Patgiri, B. J., & Prajapati, P. K. (2015). Review of bio-active principles of Butea monosperma (Lam.) Kuntze. Indian Journal of Ethno-Pharmacology, 1, 45-51.
  5. Sharma, P. C., Yelne, M. B., & Dennis, T. J. (2005). Database on medicinal plants used in Ayurveda (Vol. 3). Central Council for Research in Ayurveda and Siddha, Department of Indian Systems of Medicine and Homoeopathy, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.
  6. Nadkarni, K. M., & Nadkarni, A. K. (1976). Indian Materia Medica (Vol. 1). Popular Prakashan Private Limited, Mumbai.
  7. Kewlani, N. (2012). A comparative pharmacognostical, phytochemical and in vitro anthelmintic activity of Palasha (Butea monosperma Lam.) Beeja and Pravala. Doctoral dissertation, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, India.
  8. Parashar, B., & Dhamija, H. K. (2012). Botanical, phytochemical and biological investigation of Butea monosperma (Lam.) Kuntze. Pharmacognosy Reviews, 6(11), 40-44.
  9. [Orwa, C., Mutua, A., Kindt, R., Jamnadass, R., & Simons, A. (2009). Agroforestree Database: a tree reference and selection guide. Version 4.0. World Agroforestry Centre ICRAF, Nairobi, Kenya.
  10. Jaiswal, A. K., & Bhattacharya, A. (2002). Lac cultivation in India. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.
  11. Maurya, R., & Srivastava, S. (2011). Constituents of Butea monosperma leaves. Indian Journal of Chemistry, 50B, 1673-1676.
  12. Somani, R., Kasture, S., & Singhai, A. K. (2006). Hypoglycemic, antihyperglycemic and antioxidant activity of Butea monosperma Lam. leaves in normal and alloxan induced diabetic rats. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 106(2), 192-197.
  13. Sehrawat, A., Khan, T. H., Prasad, L., & Sultana, S. (2006). Butea monosperma and chemo modulation: protective role against thioacetamide-mediated hepatic alterations in Wistar rats. Phytomedicine, 13(3), 157-163.
  14. Kasture, V. S., Kasture, S. B., Chopde, C. T., & Deshmukh, V. K. (2000). Anticonvulsant and behavioral actions of Butea monosperma in laboratory animals. Indian Journal of Pharmacology, 32(4), 233-236.
  15. Rajesh, R., Raghavendra Gowda, C. D., & Nataraju, A. (2009). Effect of Butea monosperma stem bark methanolic extract on local and systemic effects induced by Naja naja venom. Journal of Natural Remedies, 9(2), 194-201.
  16. Harborne, J. B. (1998). Phytochemical methods: A guide to modern techniques of plant analysis (3rd ed.). Chapman and Hall, London.
  17. Trease, G. E., & Evans, W. C. (2002). Pharmacognosy (15th ed.). Saunders Publishers, London.
  18. Tiwari, P., Kumar, B., Kaur, M., Kaur, G., & Kaur, H. (2011). Phytochemical screening and extraction: a review. Internationale Pharmaceutical Sciencia, 1(1), 98-106.
  19. Panche, A. N., Diwan, A. D., & Chandra, S. R. (2016). Flavonoids: an overview. Journal of Nutritional Science, 5, e47.
  20. Badhani, B., Sharma, N., & Kakkar, R. (2015). Gallic acid: a versatile antioxidant with promising therapeutic and industrial applications. RSC Advances, 5(35), 27540-27557.

Photo
Arnab Roy
Corresponding author

Faculty of Medical Science & Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand 835219, India

Photo
Indrajeet Kumar Mahto
Co-author

Faculty of Medical Science & Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand 835219, India

Photo
Ankita Singh
Co-author

Faculty of Medical Science & Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand 835219, India

Photo
Mahesh Kumar Yadav
Co-author

Faculty of Medical Science & Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand 835219, India

Photo
Gangadhar Singh
Co-author

Faculty of Medical Science & Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand 835219, India

Photo
Sudarshan Rawani
Co-author

Faculty of Medical Science & Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand 835219, India

Photo
Suraj Kumar
Co-author

Faculty of Medical Science & Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand 835219, India

Photo
Astha Topno
Co-author

Faculty of Medical Science & Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand 835219, India

Photo
Ayush Kumar
Co-author

Faculty of Medical Science & Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand 835219, India

Photo
Purnima Kumari
Co-author

Faculty of Medical Science & Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand 835219, India

Photo
Priti Payal Jha
Co-author

Faculty of Medical Science & Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand 835219, India

Photo
Sajid Ansari
Co-author

Faculty of Medical Science & Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand 835219, India

Photo
Shiny Kumari
Co-author

Faculty of Medical Science & Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand 835219, India

Photo
Arti Kumari
Co-author

Faculty of Medical Science & Research, Sai Nath University, Ranchi, Jharkhand 835219, India

Indrajeet Kumar Mahto, Ankita Singh, Mahesh Kumar Yadav, Gangadhar Singh, Sudarshan Rawani, Suraj Kumar, Astha Topno, Ayush Kumar, Purnima Kumari, Priti Payal Jha, Sajid Ansari, Shiny Kumari, Arti Kumari, Arnab Roy*, Phytochemical Profiling and Therapeutic Potential of Butea monosperma (Lam.) leaf: A Comprehensive Analytical Study, Int. J. Med. Pharm. Sci., 2025, 1 (12), 27-33. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17879886

More related articles
Guava (Psidium guajava L.) Leaf Bioactives: From P...
Jannatul Firdaus, Tanlaka Nuradin Fonyuy, Shahnawaz Ahmad, Khushi...
Evaluation of Anti-Arthritic Activity of Aqueous E...
Shivam Yadav, Satyam Yadav, Dr. Sandeep Jain, Dr. Bharat Kumar Ta...
An Overview of Abutilon Indicum (L) Sweet...
Jansi Rani S., Prema K. , Preethi A. B., Praveen R., Praveen Kumar S., Praveen Kumar R., Mohamed Hal...
Determination and Quantification of Total Flavonoids Content in Malabar Spinach ...
Vardhineedi Shirisha, Seelamsetti Nagini, Parasa Santhi Sri, Konde Gopi Chand, Geddam Aravind, Dasar...
Formulation Development, Physicochemical Characterization, and In Vitro Evaluati...
Shubham Padol, Vishal Rasve, Swati Zade, Sneha Vairagkar, Nikita Aware, Madhuri Landge, Ganesh Banso...
Related Articles
Fast-Dissolving Oral Thin Film of Solanum Virginianum Leaves: A Novel Delivery S...
Jeba P., Essakimuthu P., Esakkiraja R., Dhanalakshmi R., Akilan M., Abin L....
Formulation and Evaluation of Chewable Tablets of Catharanthus Roseus Leaf...
Minakshi Khairnar, Sohail Shaikh, Shubham Kale, Rohit Thakre, Harshvardhan Deore, Darshana Desale, D...
Guava (Psidium guajava L.) Leaf Bioactives: From Phytochemical Characterization ...
Jannatul Firdaus, Tanlaka Nuradin Fonyuy, Shahnawaz Ahmad, Khushi Rastogi, Anshika Yadav...
More related articles
Guava (Psidium guajava L.) Leaf Bioactives: From Phytochemical Characterization ...
Jannatul Firdaus, Tanlaka Nuradin Fonyuy, Shahnawaz Ahmad, Khushi Rastogi, Anshika Yadav...
Evaluation of Anti-Arthritic Activity of Aqueous Extract of Portulacaria Afra in...
Shivam Yadav, Satyam Yadav, Dr. Sandeep Jain, Dr. Bharat Kumar Taygi...
Guava (Psidium guajava L.) Leaf Bioactives: From Phytochemical Characterization ...
Jannatul Firdaus, Tanlaka Nuradin Fonyuy, Shahnawaz Ahmad, Khushi Rastogi, Anshika Yadav...
Evaluation of Anti-Arthritic Activity of Aqueous Extract of Portulacaria Afra in...
Shivam Yadav, Satyam Yadav, Dr. Sandeep Jain, Dr. Bharat Kumar Taygi...