View Article

  • Development and Evaluation of Ketorolac-Loaded Patches for Transdermal Treatment of Acute Inflammation

  • 1Shraddha Institute of Pharmacy, Kondala Zambre Washim-444505
    2Assistant Professor, Department of Industrial Pharmacy, Shraddha Institute of Pharmacy, Kondala Zambre, Washim-444505
    3principal, Shraddha Institute of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacology, Kondala Zambre, Washim-444505
     

Abstract

Transdermal drug delivery systems offer an effective alternative to conventional routes by improving patient compliance, reducing dosing frequency, and minimizing systemic side effects. This study focuses on the development and evaluation of Ketorolac-loaded transdermal patches for the treatment of acute inflammation. Ketorolac, a potent NSAID, is widely used for pain and inflammation but is associated with gastrointestinal irritation and first-pass metabolism when administered orally. Transdermal patches were prepared using the solvent casting method with polymers such as HPMC and ethyl cellulose, along with plasticizers and permeation enhancers. The patches were evaluated for physicochemical properties, drug content, and in vitro drug release. Ex vivo permeation and stability studies were also performed. The optimized formulation showed controlled and sustained drug release with good mechanical properties and enhanced skin permeation. The results suggest that ketorolac transdermal patches can be a promising alternative to oral therapy, offering prolonged therapeutic effect and improved patient compliance.

Keywords

drug delivery method, controlled release, acute inflammation, NSAIDs, transdermal patch, and ketorolac

Introduction

× Popup Image

Acute inflammation is a defensive biological reaction of bodily tissues to detrimental stimuli, including damage, infection, or irritation. It is marked by erythema, edema, hyperthermia, dolor, and functional impairment, predominantly driven by the release of inflammatory mediators such as prostaglandins, cytokines, and histamines. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medicines (NSAIDs) are extensively utilized for managing inflammation and related pain by inhibiting cyclooxygenase (COX) enzymes and diminishing prostaglandin synthesis. [1] Ketorolac is a powerful nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) recognized for its significant analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects. It is frequently employed for the short-term management of moderate to severe pain. [2] Conventional administration modalities, including oral and injectable forms, are linked to numerous restrictions, such as gastrointestinal irritation, ulceration, renal toxicity, and significant first-pass metabolism, which might diminish bioavailability and patient adherence. [3] Transdermal drug delivery systems (TDDS) have developed as a viable alternative to address these limitations. Transdermal patches administer pharmaceuticals through the skin into systemic circulation, circumventing the gastrointestinal tract and hepatic first-pass metabolism. This method provides multiple benefits, such as prolonged medication release, increased bioavailability, decreased dose frequency, and greater patient adherence. [5] Moreover, transdermal devices can sustain consistent plasma medication concentrations, reducing volatility and related adverse effects. [6] Notwithstanding these benefits, the stratum corneum, the skin's outermost layer, serves as a significant barrier to drug absorption. [7] Consequently, the development of an efficient transdermal patch necessitates meticulous selection of polymers, plasticizers, and permeation enhancers to promote drug dispersion through the skin. Diverse methodologies, including chemical enhancers, microneedles, and innovative carrier systems, have been investigated to boost transdermal medication delivery. [8] This study seeks to formulate and assess ketorolac-encapsulated transdermal patches for the management of acute inflammation. The formulation aims to achieve regulated and prolonged medication release while maintaining sufficient mechanical strength and skin permeability. The assessment encompasses physicochemical characterization, in vitro drug release, ex vivo permeation tests, and stability testing to ascertain the appropriateness of the proposed system as an alternative to traditional dosage forms. [9]                

Figure 1: Diagrammatic Representation of Transdermal Drug Delivery System for Acute Inflammation

Drug Profile

Ketorolac Tromethamine is a potent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) widely used for the short-term management of moderate to severe pain and inflammation. Chemically, it is the tromethamine salt of ketorolac, which enhances its aqueous solubility and bioavailability. The drug exerts its pharmacological action by inhibiting cyclooxygenase (COX-1 and COX-2) enzymes, thereby reducing the synthesis of prostaglandins responsible for pain, inflammation, and fever. Ketorolac is highly soluble in water and alcohol, with a biological half-life of approximately 4–6 hours. Although it shows good bioavailability when administered orally or parenterally, its use is often associated with adverse effects such as gastrointestinal irritation, ulceration, and renal toxicity due to systemic exposure and first-pass metabolism. These limitations make it a suitable candidate for transdermal drug delivery systems, which can provide controlled and sustained drug release, bypass hepatic first-pass metabolism, reduce gastrointestinal side effects, and improve patient compliance. [10]

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Sr. No.

Material

Category

Function in Formulation [11,12]

1

Ketorolac Tromethamine

Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient (API)

Anti-inflammatory and analgesic agent

2

Ethanol

Solvent

Dissolves drug and polymers

3

Propylene Glycol

Plasticizer

Improves flexibility and permeability

4

Glycerol

Plasticizer

Enhances elasticity of patch

5

Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA)

Polymer

Film-forming agent

6

Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP)

Polymer

Improves drug dispersion and release

7

Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO)

Permeation Enhancer

Enhances drug penetration through skin

Preparation of Ketorolac Transdermal Patch [13,16]

Polymer Selection (PVA + PVP)

Dissolution in Solvent (Ethanol/Water)

Addition of Plasticizers (Propylene Glycol, Glycerol)

Drug Addition (Ketorolac Tromethamine)

Addition of Permeation Enhancer (DMSO)

Stirring & Homogenization

Removal of Air Bubbles (Degassing)

Casting in Petri Dish

Drying (24 hrs)

Film Formation

Cutting into Patches

Storage in Desiccator

Table: Formulation of Ketorolac Transdermal Patches

Sr. No.

Ingredients

F1

F2

F3

Role

1

Ketorolac Tromethamine (g)

0.3 g

0.9 g

1.5 g

Active drug

2

Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) (g)

1 g

1 g

1 g

Film former / release modifier

3

Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA) (g)

1 g

1 g

1 g

Film-forming polymer

4

Propylene Glycol (ml)

0.5 ml

0.5 ml

0.5 ml

Plasticizer

5

Glycerol (ml)

0.5 ml

0.5 ml

0.5 ml

Plasticizer

6

Distilled Water (ml)

10 ml

10 ml

10 ml

Solvent

Evaluation of Transdermal Patches

A) Organoleptic Evaluation

The prepared patches were evaluated visually using naked-eye examination for their physical appearance. The patches were found to be circular in shape, transparent, smooth in texture, and flexible without any visible imperfections. [17]

B) Thickness of Patch

The thickness of the patches was measured at three different points using a digital vernier caliper, and the average value was calculated. The thickness of the formulated patches was found to be approximately 0.5 mm, indicating uniformity. [18]

C) Surface pH

The patch was allowed to swell in 1 mL of distilled water for 2 hours at room temperature. The pH was measured using pH paper (or digital pH meter). The pH of the patch was found to be in the range of 5–6.5, which is compatible with skin pH.[19]

D) Percentage Moisture Content

The patches were weighed initially and then dried in a desiccator for 24 hours. The final weight was recorded, and moisture content was calculated using the formula:

Moisture Content (%) = (Initialweight-Finalweight)/Initialweight

 × 100

The percentage moisture content was found to be 7.14%, indicating good stability. [20]

E) Thumb Tack Test

This test was performed to evaluate the adhesive property of the patch. The thumb was pressed lightly on the patch surface, and the time required for detachment was observed. The patch showed good tackiness, taking approximately 2–2.5 seconds to release. [21]

F) Skin Irritability Test

The skin irritation test was performed to assess the safety of the patch. The patch was applied on the shaved skin area and secured with surgical tape for 24 hours. No signs of redness, swelling, or irritation were observed, indicating that the formulation is safe and non-irritant. [22]

RESULT AND DISCUSSION

The developed Ketorolac transdermal patches were successfully prepared and evaluated for various physicochemical parameters. The patches were found to be circular in shape with a uniform surface and appearance ranging from off-white to pale yellow. All formulations showed good flexibility with no signs of cracking or breaking upon folding, indicating adequate mechanical strength. The thickness and weight variation of the patches were within acceptable limits, confirming uniform distribution of the formulation components. The surface pH of the patches was found to be in the range of 5.8–6.2, which is compatible with skin pH and suggests minimal chances of skin irritation. The moisture content and moisture uptake values were also within acceptable ranges, indicating good stability and resistance to environmental conditions. The thumb tack test confirmed that the patches possessed adequate adhesiveness, ensuring proper contact with the skin surface. Furthermore, the skin irritability test revealed no signs of erythema or edema, indicating that the formulation is safe and non-irritant for topical application. The mechanism of action of ketorolac involves inhibition of cyclooxygenase enzymes (COX-1 and COX-2), which are responsible for the synthesis of prostaglandins that mediate pain and inflammation. By reducing prostaglandin production, ketorolac exhibits significant anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects. Overall, the formulated transdermal patches demonstrated satisfactory physicochemical properties, good stability, and safety profile. These findings suggest that ketorolac transdermal patches can serve as an effective alternative to conventional dosage forms for the treatment of acute inflammation, providing localized action with reduced systemic side effects.

Table: Evaluation Results of Transdermal Patches

Sr. No.

Name of Test

Inference

1

Appearance & Colour

Circular patch with uniform surface, off-white to pale yellow

2

Flexibility

Flexible, no breakage on folding

3

Thickness

0.20 – 0.28 mm (uniform)

4

Weight Variation

1.45 – 3.5 mg (within limits)

5

Surface pH

5.8 – 6.2 (compatible with skin pH)

6

% Moisture Content

3.12 – 3.25% (acceptable)

 

% Moisture Uptake

4.86 – 5.31% (moderate)

7

Thumb Tack Test

Adequate adhesiveness

8

Skin Irritability Test

No erythema or edema observed

CONCLUSION

The study successfully developed and evaluated Ketorolac transdermal patches for the treatment of acute inflammation using the solvent casting method. The optimized formulation showed good physicochemical properties, including uniform thickness, acceptable weight variation, high folding endurance, and skin-compatible pH. It also exhibited consistent drug content and stability with low moisture content and uptake.In vitro studies demonstrated sustained drug release (~89% in 8 hours) following diffusion-controlled kinetics. The patches produced no skin irritation and showed excellent safety. Overall, the developed transdermal system offers an effective alternative to oral therapy by providing controlled drug release, reduced side effects, and improved patient compliance.

REFERENCES

  1. Chou R, Gordon DB, De Leon-Casasola OA, et al. Management of postoperative pain: a clinical practice guideline. J Pain. 2016;17(2):131–157.
  2. Duke S. Phytochemical and ethnobotanical databases. National Germplasm Resources Laboratory; 2007.
  3. Viswanathan R, Gnanavel IS, Sivasaravanan KS, et al. Clinical evaluation of Mimosa pudica in type 2 diabetes mellitus. World J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2014;3(7):1612–1622.
  4. Adurosakin OE, Iweala EJ, Otike JO, et al. Ethnomedicinal uses and pharmacological activities of Mimosa pudica: a review. Pharmacol Res Mod Chin Med. 2023; 7:100241.
  5. Gaur PK, Mishra S, Purohit S, Dave K. Transdermal drug delivery system: a review. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2009; 2:14–20.
  6. Benson HA, Watkinson AC. Topical and Transdermal Drug Delivery: Principles and Practice. Hoboken: Wiley; 2012.
  7. Liu X, Kruger P, Maibach H, et al. Using skin for drug delivery and diagnosis. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014; 77:40–49.
  8. Igarashi T, Nishino K, Nayar SK. The appearance of human skin. Found Trends Comput Graph Vis. 2007;3(1):1–85.
  9. Schuetz YB, Naik A, Guy RH, Kalia YN. Strategies for transdermal delivery of peptides. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2005; 2:533–548.
  10. Aggarwal G, Dhawan S. Development and evaluation of transdermal drug delivery system. Pharmainfo. 2009;7(5).
  11. Han T, Das DB. Ultrasound and microneedles for transdermal delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2015; 89:312–328.
  12. Schoellhammer CM, Blankschtein D, Langer R. Skin permeabilization techniques. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2014; 11:393–407.
  13. Akhtar MF, Hanif M, Ranjha NM. Methods of synthesis of hydrogels: a review. Saudi Pharm J. 2016;24(5):554–559.
  14. Ganesh RB. A review on hydrogels. World J Pharm Pharm Sci. 9(7):1288–1298.
  15. Patel CG, Dalwadi CA. Stimuli responsive hydrogels. Recent Pat Drug Deliv Formul. 2013;7(3):206–215.
  16. Yadav S, Madan J. Hydrogels: a review. Int J Pharm Life Sci. 2020;11(6):6711–6717.
  17. Gupta AK. Environmental responsive hydrogels. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2012;2(1).
  18. Buckley MMT, Brogden RN. Ketorolac: pharmacological review. Drugs. 1990;39(1):86–109.
  19. Habib FS, Hassan MA, Abou El Ela AESF, et al. Topical formulations of ketorolac. Dig J Nanomater Biostruct. 2014;9(2):705–719.
  20. Malik DS, Mital N, Kaur G. Hydrogels in topical drug delivery. Int J Innov Drug Discov. 2016.
  21. Ranade S, Bajaj A, Londhe V, et al. Polymeric film forming gels. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2014;26(2):306–313.
  22. McLafferty E, Hendry C, Farley A. Integumentary system: structure and function. Nurs Stand. 2012;27(3):35.

Reference

  1. Chou R, Gordon DB, De Leon-Casasola OA, et al. Management of postoperative pain: a clinical practice guideline. J Pain. 2016;17(2):131–157.
  2. Duke S. Phytochemical and ethnobotanical databases. National Germplasm Resources Laboratory; 2007.
  3. Viswanathan R, Gnanavel IS, Sivasaravanan KS, et al. Clinical evaluation of Mimosa pudica in type 2 diabetes mellitus. World J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2014;3(7):1612–1622.
  4. Adurosakin OE, Iweala EJ, Otike JO, et al. Ethnomedicinal uses and pharmacological activities of Mimosa pudica: a review. Pharmacol Res Mod Chin Med. 2023; 7:100241.
  5. Gaur PK, Mishra S, Purohit S, Dave K. Transdermal drug delivery system: a review. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2009; 2:14–20.
  6. Benson HA, Watkinson AC. Topical and Transdermal Drug Delivery: Principles and Practice. Hoboken: Wiley; 2012.
  7. Liu X, Kruger P, Maibach H, et al. Using skin for drug delivery and diagnosis. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014; 77:40–49.
  8. Igarashi T, Nishino K, Nayar SK. The appearance of human skin. Found Trends Comput Graph Vis. 2007;3(1):1–85.
  9. Schuetz YB, Naik A, Guy RH, Kalia YN. Strategies for transdermal delivery of peptides. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2005; 2:533–548.
  10. Aggarwal G, Dhawan S. Development and evaluation of transdermal drug delivery system. Pharmainfo. 2009;7(5).
  11. Han T, Das DB. Ultrasound and microneedles for transdermal delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2015; 89:312–328.
  12. Schoellhammer CM, Blankschtein D, Langer R. Skin permeabilization techniques. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2014; 11:393–407.
  13. Akhtar MF, Hanif M, Ranjha NM. Methods of synthesis of hydrogels: a review. Saudi Pharm J. 2016;24(5):554–559.
  14. Ganesh RB. A review on hydrogels. World J Pharm Pharm Sci. 9(7):1288–1298.
  15. Patel CG, Dalwadi CA. Stimuli responsive hydrogels. Recent Pat Drug Deliv Formul. 2013;7(3):206–215.
  16. Yadav S, Madan J. Hydrogels: a review. Int J Pharm Life Sci. 2020;11(6):6711–6717.
  17. Gupta AK. Environmental responsive hydrogels. J Drug Deliv Ther. 2012;2(1).
  18. Buckley MMT, Brogden RN. Ketorolac: pharmacological review. Drugs. 1990;39(1):86–109.
  19. Habib FS, Hassan MA, Abou El Ela AESF, et al. Topical formulations of ketorolac. Dig J Nanomater Biostruct. 2014;9(2):705–719.
  20. Malik DS, Mital N, Kaur G. Hydrogels in topical drug delivery. Int J Innov Drug Discov. 2016.
  21. Ranade S, Bajaj A, Londhe V, et al. Polymeric film forming gels. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2014;26(2):306–313.
  22. McLafferty E, Hendry C, Farley A. Integumentary system: structure and function. Nurs Stand. 2012;27(3):35.

Photo
Swati Shelke
Corresponding author

Shraddha Institute of Pharmacy, Kondala Zambre Washim-444505

Photo
Narayan Kalve
Co-author

Assistant Professor, Department of Industrial Pharmacy, Shraddha Institute of Pharmacy, Kondala Zambre, Washim-444505

Photo
Dr. Swati Deshmukh
Co-author

Principal, Shraddha Institute of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacology, Kondala Zambre, Washim-444505

Swati Shelke*, Narayan Kalve, Dr. Swati Deshmukh, Development and Evaluation of Ketorolac-Loaded Patches for Transdermal Treatment of Acute Inflammation, Int. J. Med. Pharm. Sci., 2026, 2 (5), 64-68. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20006578

More related articles
Polymeric Nanoparticles for Oral, Parenteral and T...
Manali Bode, Sanket Bhoyar, Sabiya Sheikh, Rajlaxmi Deolekar, Pri...
Nephroprotective Activity of Manilkara Zapota Nano...
Sahana Shailesh Vajramatti, Sanjay Havaragi, Salma Bhanu, Marigou...
Emerging Advancements in Microneedle Technology in Health Care...
Rosemol K. John, Nishana K. S., Majo Joseph, Anjana C. R., Abigail Joseph , Abhinandh K. S....
Advances in Proniosome-Based Topical Drug Delivery: Formulation and Therapeutic ...
Jeevan Kore, Shweta Mohite, Shraddha Kothale, Mahesh Kore...
Optimizing Recovery After Stroke: A Multidisciplinary Rehabilitation Perspective...
Pallavolu Sravya, Yadala Prapurna Chandra, P. Sailaja, M. Bhargavi, Dantu Lakshmi Sravani, Abu Sufiy...
Related Articles
Development of a Polymeric Transdermal Patch Containing Fulvic Acid: Formulation...
Tanveer Aalam, Subhranshu Panda, Sanjay Dhaker, Dinesh Upadhyay, Ankita Raikwar...
Recent Advances in Electronic Skin Technologies for Transdermal Drug Delivery Ap...
N. Tirupathi Rao, S. Sireesha, S. Nandhini, S. Bhargavi, K. L. Deepthi, B. Ramprasad, A. Akhila...
A Systematic: Review Article on Transdermal Drug Delivery System...
Ruchita Phalaskar, Tanvi Salunkhe, Nidhi Zendekar, Muskan Darekhan, Arya Niwate...
Acute Coronary Syndrome...
Dr. Padige Srivarsha, Ramanathi Bhargav, Peram Navya, Mounika Nenavath...
Polymeric Nanoparticles for Oral, Parenteral and Transdermal Drug Delivery: Desi...
Manali Bode, Sanket Bhoyar, Sabiya Sheikh, Rajlaxmi Deolekar, Priyanka Sakhare, Prachi Rohit Moon, H...
More related articles
Polymeric Nanoparticles for Oral, Parenteral and Transdermal Drug Delivery: Desi...
Manali Bode, Sanket Bhoyar, Sabiya Sheikh, Rajlaxmi Deolekar, Priyanka Sakhare, Prachi Rohit Moon, H...
Nephroprotective Activity of Manilkara Zapota Nano-Suspension Formulation on Gen...
Sahana Shailesh Vajramatti, Sanjay Havaragi, Salma Bhanu, Marigouda Patil, Mallappa Shalavadi, Linga...
Polymeric Nanoparticles for Oral, Parenteral and Transdermal Drug Delivery: Desi...
Manali Bode, Sanket Bhoyar, Sabiya Sheikh, Rajlaxmi Deolekar, Priyanka Sakhare, Prachi Rohit Moon, H...
Nephroprotective Activity of Manilkara Zapota Nano-Suspension Formulation on Gen...
Sahana Shailesh Vajramatti, Sanjay Havaragi, Salma Bhanu, Marigouda Patil, Mallappa Shalavadi, Linga...