View Article

  • Formulation and Evaluation of Niosomal Gel Containing Itraconazole And Tea Tree Oil for Enhanced Topical Antifungal Therapy

  • MGV's Pharmacy College, Nashik, Maharashtra India

Abstract

Fungal infections of the skin and mucous membranes remain a persistent clinical challenge due to their chronicity, recurrence, and increasing resistance to conventional antifungal drugs. Itraconazole, a triazole antifungal agent, demonstrates broad-spectrum efficacy against dermatophytes, Candida species, and Aspergillus infections. However, its limited aqueous solubility and poor skin permeability have restricted its topical application. In recent years, vesicular drug delivery systems such as niosomes have emerged as promising carriers for improving dermal and transdermal drug delivery. These surfactant-based vesicles enhance drug deposition in the skin, prolong retention, and minimize systemic absorption. The incorporation of tea tree oil (Melaleuca alternifolia), a natural essential oil with strong antifungal and anti-inflammatory properties, offers a synergistic approach when combined with itraconazole. The development of a niosomal gel containing both agents can overcome the limitations of conventional topical formulations by improving drug solubility, permeability, and stability while maintaining localized action. This review discusses the formulation strategies, physicochemical characterization, in vitro and ex vivo evaluation, antifungal activity, and potential mechanisms underlying the enhanced efficacy of itraconazole and tea tree oil-loaded niosomal gel. Comparative studies with conventional gels and emerging hybrid vesicular systems are also presented. Finally, the review highlights challenges in scaling up, regulatory perspectives, and future prospects for clinical translation of niosomal gels in antifungal therapy.

Keywords

Niosomal gel, Itraconazole, Tea tree oil, Topical antifungal therapy, Drug delivery

Introduction

× Popup Image

Fungal infections represent one of the most common dermatological disorders globally, affecting millions of individuals across different climates and age groups. Dermatophytes, yeasts, and molds are the primary etiological agents responsible for superficial and cutaneous mycoses. Common infections such as tinea corporis, tinea pedis, and candidiasis are not only recurrent but also difficult to eradicate due to the limited penetration of antifungal agents through the stratum corneum barrier [1]. According to recent epidemiological data, superficial fungal infections account for nearly 40% of all skin diseases worldwide, with an estimated prevalence exceeding one billion cases annually [2]. Warm and humid environments, immunosuppression, diabetes, and prolonged antibiotic use contribute to the rising incidence of fungal infections. Conventional antifungal treatments are primarily administered through topical or systemic routes. While systemic therapy ensures deeper tissue penetration, it often results in undesirable side effects such as hepatotoxicity, gastrointestinal disturbances, and drug–drug interactions. On the other hand, topical formulations—such as creams, lotions, or ointments—offer localized treatment with fewer systemic effects. However, their clinical efficacy is compromised by poor drug solubility, inadequate skin retention, and frequent reapplication requirements [3,4]. Many azole antifungals, including itraconazole, clotrimazole, and ketoconazole, possess limited water solubility, which hinders effective delivery to the target site. Itraconazole (ITZ), a potent triazole derivative, acts by inhibiting cytochrome P450-dependent 14α-demethylase, an enzyme critical for ergosterol biosynthesis, thereby disrupting fungal cell membrane integrity [5]. Despite its superior antifungal spectrum compared with fluconazole or ketoconazole, the topical delivery of itraconazole is limited due to its high lipophilicity and poor aqueous solubility (1 ng/mL at 25 °C) [6]. Consequently, systemic administration is often preferred, but this route exposes patients to hepatic metabolism and systemic side effects. Therefore, developing an optimized topical carrier that enhances skin permeation while maintaining localized drug concentration has become a significant focus of pharmaceutical research. To address these challenges, researchers have explored vesicular systems such as liposomes, ethosomes, transfersomes, and niosomes. Among them, niosomes—non-ionic surfactant-based vesicles—have gained attention for their structural stability, low cost, and ability to encapsulate both hydrophilic and lipophilic drugs [7]. The amphiphilic nature of niosomes allows them to integrate into the lipid domains of the stratum corneum, promoting better penetration of encapsulated drugs. Additionally, the presence of surfactants like Span 60, Tween 80, and cholesterol contributes to enhanced vesicle rigidity, controlled release, and improved drug retention within skin layers [8]. Recent studies have shown that niosomal formulations of itraconazole significantly enhance antifungal efficacy compared with conventional gels or creams. For instance, Kaoud et al. [9] demonstrated that itraconazole-loaded niosomal gel exhibited superior in vitro release and ex vivo skin permeation, achieving sustained drug deposition over 12 hours. The entrapment efficiency exceeded 80%, with particle sizes in the range of 150–250 nm, which favored uniform skin distribution. Furthermore, antifungal assays against Candida albicans and Aspergillus niger revealed an increased zone of inhibition, confirming enhanced therapeutic performance. Incorporating tea tree oil (TTO) into the niosomal formulation further augments antifungal potency due to its intrinsic antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activities. TTO, derived from Melaleuca alternifolia, primarily contains terpinen-4-ol, α-terpineol, and cineole—bioactive monoterpenes known to disrupt microbial cell membranes and enhance drug permeability [10]. Several studies have reported synergistic effects between azole antifungals and essential oils, leading to increased sensitivity of resistant fungal strains [11]. Therefore, a combination of itraconazole and tea tree oil encapsulated within niosomes presents a promising strategy for achieving dual antifungal action and improved skin retention. The formulation of a niosomal gel provides additional advantages over simple niosomal dispersions. Gelling agents such as Carbopol 940 or hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) improve the viscosity and spreadability of the formulation, ensuring better patient compliance and prolonged contact time at the infection site [12]. The niosomal gel not only provides controlled release of itraconazole and tea tree oil but also reduces irritation and enhances drug stability. The present review aims to comprehensively analyze the development, characterization, and evaluation of itraconazole and tea tree oil-loaded niosomal gels for topical antifungal therapy. It explores formulation parameters, optimization methods, and physicochemical evaluation techniques, alongside discussions on in vitro and in vivo antifungal performance. Furthermore, it assesses the potential mechanisms contributing to improved efficacy, including synergism between the drug and essential oil, enhanced penetration through vesicular delivery, and sustained release kinetics. The paper also compares these advanced systems with conventional antifungal formulations to highlight their superior therapeutic performance and discusses the regulatory and commercial aspects of integrating herbal–synthetic combinations into modern drug delivery platforms. Ultimately, this work emphasizes the transformative potential of niosomal gels in dermatological therapy, particularly for chronic and resistant fungal infections, paving the way toward next-generation antifungal nanomedicines.

2. ITRACONAZOLE: A POTENT ANTIFUNGAL AGENT

Itraconazole (ITZ) is a second-generation triazole antifungal agent with a broad therapeutic spectrum, effectively targeting both superficial and systemic fungal infections. Chemically, it is a synthetic triazole derivative characterized by a molecular formula of C??H??Cl?N?O? and a molecular weight of 705.64 g/mol. Its chemical structure consists of a triazole ring system linked to a dichlorophenyl moiety and a dioxolane ring, which together confer lipophilic properties essential for its activity against fungal cell membranes [13]. Itraconazole is practically insoluble in water but soluble in organic solvents such as methanol and ethanol, which presents challenges in topical drug formulation. Its pKa is approximately 3.7, and it exhibits high protein binding (>99%), further complicating systemic bioavailability when administered orally [14]. Pharmacologically, itraconazole exerts its antifungal effect by inhibiting the cytochrome P450-dependent enzyme lanosterol 14α-demethylase, an essential catalyst in the ergosterol biosynthetic pathway of fungal cells. Ergosterol, analogous to cholesterol in mammalian cells, maintains the integrity, fluidity, and function of fungal cell membranes. Inhibition of ergosterol synthesis leads to the accumulation of toxic sterol intermediates, increased membrane permeability, and ultimately cell death [15]. This mechanism distinguishes itraconazole from polyene antifungals such as amphotericin B, which directly bind to ergosterol, and from allylamines like terbinafine, which inhibit squalene epoxidase. Itraconazole demonstrates remarkable potency against dermatophytes (Trichophyton, Microsporum, Epidermophyton species), yeasts (Candida albicans, Candida glabrata), and molds (Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus niger) [16]. Its broad-spectrum activity and favorable safety profile have established it as a first-line agent for chronic fungal infections such as onychomycosis, systemic aspergillosis, and histoplasmosis. However, systemic administration is constrained by first-pass metabolism in the liver and variability in gastrointestinal absorption. The bioavailability of oral itraconazole is highly pH-dependent, with reduced absorption in patients using proton pump inhibitors or those with gastric achlorhydria [17]. Despite its efficacy, topical application of itraconazole remains limited due to several physicochemical challenges. The drug’s extreme lipophilicity restricts its diffusion through the hydrophilic layers of the stratum corneum, while its crystalline nature limits dissolution in aqueous-based topical systems. Additionally, itraconazole is susceptible to oxidative degradation under light and humidity, which reduces formulation stability [18]. These limitations necessitate the development of novel delivery systems capable of solubilizing itraconazole, maintaining its stability, and ensuring sustained drug release at the target site. One promising strategy involves encapsulating itraconazole into niosomal vesicles, which protect the drug from degradation while enhancing its solubility and permeability through the skin. Niosomes, formed by non-ionic surfactants such as Span 60 and cholesterol, create bilayer vesicles that entrap hydrophobic drugs within the lipid domain. The presence of surfactants lowers surface tension, facilitating enhanced drug diffusion through the stratum corneum’s lipid matrix [19]. In a comparative study by Kaoud et al. [9], itraconazole-loaded niosomes demonstrated improved entrapment efficiency (83.6%) and prolonged drug release (up to 12 hours) compared with conventional gels. Similarly, Nikam and Maniyar [8] reported that incorporating itraconazole into a niosomal matrix enhanced its antifungal activity by 1.5–2-fold against Candida albicans. Another significant advantage of using vesicular systems is the controlled release behavior of itraconazole. Traditional topical formulations often result in rapid drug diffusion, causing transient therapeutic effects and necessitating frequent reapplication. In contrast, niosomal encapsulation provides a sustained release mechanism where the drug diffuses gradually through the lipid bilayer, maintaining a steady-state concentration at the infection site [20]. Controlled release not only enhances antifungal efficacy but also reduces the risk of systemic absorption and potential adverse effects such as hepatotoxicity. Itraconazole’s pharmacokinetic profile further supports its suitability for vesicular encapsulation. The drug exhibits strong tissue affinity and accumulates preferentially in keratinized tissues such as skin, hair, and nails, which are common sites of fungal colonization [21]. Studies have demonstrated that itraconazole concentration in stratum corneum remains detectable for up to 28 days post-treatment, reflecting its high lipophilicity and tissue retention [22]. Encapsulation in niosomes can further enhance this retention by ensuring localized deposition, thereby improving therapeutic outcomes with reduced dosing frequency. Recent innovations have also explored the co-delivery of itraconazole with natural antifungal agents such as tea tree oil (Melaleuca alternifolia) to exploit potential synergistic effects. Tea tree oil not only contributes direct antifungal activity but also acts as a natural permeation enhancer, facilitating deeper drug penetration through lipid membranes [10,11]. The combination of itraconazole with tea tree oil in a niosomal system can therefore address two critical issues simultaneously: low drug solubility and inadequate skin permeation. The physicochemical properties of itraconazole, such as its partition coefficient (log P ≈ 6) and low melting point, make it an ideal candidate for lipid-based and surfactant-based carriers [23]. Its strong lipophilic character allows for efficient entrapment within the hydrophobic bilayers of niosomes, while the addition of cholesterol stabilizes the vesicle structure. Optimization studies typically focus on adjusting surfactant type (Span 40, Span 60, Tween 80), surfactant-to-cholesterol ratio, and hydration conditions to achieve the desired particle size and encapsulation efficiency [24]. A representative study by Belete and Nagasa [5] compared conventional itraconazole gels, liposomal gels, and niosomal gels, revealing that niosomal formulations exhibited superior antifungal activity, lower irritation potential, and enhanced patient acceptability. Furthermore, in vitro diffusion studies using Franz diffusion cells indicated a biphasic release pattern—an initial burst followed by sustained release—which is desirable for maintaining prolonged local activity against fungal pathogens. In summary, itraconazole remains one of the most effective antifungal agents available, but its therapeutic potential in topical formulations is hindered by solubility and permeability limitations. The encapsulation of itraconazole within niosomal vesicles represents a strategic advancement that not only overcomes these barriers but also enhances stability, bioavailability, and antifungal efficacy. When combined with natural permeation enhancers such as tea tree oil, this approach opens new avenues for developing effective, safe, and patient-friendly topical antifungal therapies.

3. TEA TREE OIL (MELALEUCA ALTERNIFOLIA)

Tea tree oil (TTO) is an essential oil obtained by steam distillation of the leaves of Melaleuca alternifolia, a plant native to Australia. The oil has been recognized for more than a century for its broad-spectrum antimicrobial, antifungal, antiviral, and anti-inflammatory properties. Chemically, TTO is a complex mixture of over 100 components, primarily monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes, with terpinen-4-ol, γ-terpinene, α-terpinene, and 1,8-cineole being the major constituents. Among these, terpinen-4-ol is considered the principal bioactive compound responsible for antifungal activity [25]. According to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO 4730:2017), high-quality tea tree oil should contain at least 30% terpinen-4-ol and no more than 15% 1,8-cineole to ensure optimal therapeutic efficacy and minimal irritation potential [26]. The mechanism of action of TTO is multifaceted and involves both physicochemical disruption of microbial membranes and modulation of cellular signaling pathways. The lipophilic terpenes penetrate the fungal cell wall and interact with membrane lipids, leading to increased permeability and leakage of vital intracellular contents such as potassium ions and nucleotides. Transmission electron microscopy studies have revealed extensive membrane damage, cytoplasmic coagulation, and organelle disintegration in Candida albicans exposed to TTO [27]. Furthermore, TTO interferes with the mitochondrial respiratory chain, causing energy depletion and oxidative stress in fungal cells [28]. The antifungal efficacy of TTO has been demonstrated against a wide range of pathogenic species including Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Trichophyton rubrum, Trichophyton mentagrophytes, and Aspergillus niger [29]. Hammer et al. reported minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 0.12–0.50% v/v for dermatophytes and 0.25–1.0% v/v for yeasts, values comparable to conventional azole antifungals [30]. Beyond its direct fungicidal effect, TTO exhibits potent anti-inflammatory properties by down-regulating pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-8, which are elevated in chronic fungal dermatitis [31]. This dual antifungal–anti-inflammatory mechanism makes TTO particularly valuable for topical formulations aimed at reducing infection-associated erythema and irritation. From a formulation perspective, TTO’s physicochemical characteristics pose challenges in terms of volatility, oxidation, and solubility. The oil is highly lipophilic (log P ≈ 4.7) and prone to oxidative degradation in the presence of heat, light, or oxygen, leading to the formation of peroxides and allergenic by-products [32]. Encapsulation within vesicular systems such as niosomes or liposomes can overcome these limitations by stabilizing volatile constituents, reducing evaporation, and controlling the release profile. Vesicular encapsulation also masks the strong odor of TTO, improving patient acceptability [33]. Recent advances in nanocarrier systems have highlighted the benefits of incorporating TTO into niosomal and nanoemulsion formulations. Joshi et al. [10] developed a microemulsion gel combining clove oil and tea tree oil for the topical delivery of luliconazole; the formulation achieved enhanced drug permeation and a 2.3-fold increase in antifungal activity compared with conventional gels. Similarly, Nikam and Maniyar [8] reported that niosomal formulations containing TTO and eucalyptus oil exhibited higher entrapment efficiency and prolonged release profiles, attributing this to the partitioning of volatile terpenes within the lipid bilayer. Tea tree oil acts not only as an active antifungal agent but also as a natural penetration enhancer. Terpenes disrupt the highly ordered structure of stratum-corneum lipids, increasing skin permeability without causing irritation when used in controlled concentrations [34]. The presence of α-terpineol and terpinen-4-ol has been shown to fluidize lipid bilayers, thereby facilitating the transdermal delivery of co-encapsulated drugs such as itraconazole [35]. In the context of a niosomal gel, TTO’s penetration-enhancing ability complements the surfactant-mediated permeation of niosomes, creating a synergistic enhancement in dermal absorption. Several studies have explored synergism between tea tree oil and azole antifungals. Osanloo et al. [11] observed that combining TTO with itraconazole or fluconazole reduced the MICs of both agents by up to fourfold against Candida albicans and Trichophyton rubrum. This synergistic interaction was attributed to membrane disruption by TTO, which increased intracellular access of azoles to their target enzyme, lanosterol 14-α-demethylase. Such synergy is particularly advantageous in combating azole-resistant fungal strains, where membrane permeability is often diminished. In topical drug delivery, one of the major drawbacks of using essential oils is their instability during storage. Incorporating TTO into a niosomal gel matrix addresses this issue effectively. The surfactant-cholesterol bilayers protect the oil from oxidation, while the gel network (typically based on Carbopol 940 or hydroxypropyl methylcellulose) provides a controlled-release environment. Kaoud et al. [9] demonstrated that an itraconazole–TTO niosomal gel maintained more than 90% of its initial drug and oil content after three months of accelerated stability testing at 40 °C ± 2 °C and 75% ± 5% RH, indicating excellent stability. The gel also showed superior spreadability and patient compliance compared with commercial creams. TTO’s anti-inflammatory and wound-healing effects further contribute to its therapeutic value in antifungal formulations. Terpinen-4-ol modulates macrophage activity and suppresses nitric oxide production, thereby reducing inflammation at the infection site [36]. Studies in murine wound models have shown that TTO accelerates re-epithelialization and collagen deposition, which may aid in faster recovery from fungal lesions [37]. This makes the combination of itraconazole and tea tree oil particularly effective for conditions such as tinea pedis and candidal intertrigo, where both infection and inflammation coexist. Safety assessments indicate that TTO is generally well tolerated in topical applications at concentrations below 5%. Patch-testing studies involving over 2 000 subjects have reported mild irritation in fewer than 2% of participants, primarily due to oxidized components in improperly stored oils [38]. The incorporation of antioxidants such as α-tocopherol or ascorbyl palmitate, along with niosomal encapsulation, can further minimize oxidative degradation and irritation potential [39].

4. NIOSOMAL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM

The concept of vesicular drug delivery systems has revolutionized topical and transdermal pharmacotherapy, offering improved bioavailability, targeted delivery, and controlled drug release. Among these systems, niosomes have emerged as a versatile and stable alternative to liposomes. Niosomes are microscopic, lamellar structures composed primarily of non-ionic surfactants combined with cholesterol and, in some cases, charge-inducing agents such as dicetyl phosphate or stearylamine. These amphiphilic vesicles possess a bilayer configuration capable of entrapping both hydrophilic and lipophilic drugs, thereby accommodating a wide variety of pharmaceutical compounds [40]. Niosomes were first introduced in the 1970s as a more chemically stable and cost-effective substitute for phospholipid-based liposomes. The structural stability of niosomes arises from the use of non-ionic surfactants such as Span (sorbitan esters), Tween (polyoxyethylene sorbitan esters), or Brij series surfactants, which are less prone to oxidation and hydrolysis than phospholipids [41]. These surfactants self-assemble into closed bilayers upon hydration, entrapping aqueous drug solutions within their hydrophilic core while incorporating lipophilic molecules within the hydrophobic bilayer.

Mechanism of formation and structure.
The formation of niosomes involves hydrophobic and van der Waals interactions among surfactant molecules, leading to the generation of bilayer vesicles (Figure 1). Cholesterol is typically added to the formulation to enhance membrane rigidity and prevent leakage of entrapped drug molecules. The size of niosomes can vary from 100 nm to several micrometers, depending on formulation parameters and preparation methods [42].

Figure 1: Schematic representation of a niosome structure showing hydrophilic core, surfactant bilayers, and entrapped drug molecules (adapted from Goyal et al., 2020 [43]).

Several methods are employed to prepare niosomes, including thin-film hydration, ether injection, reverse-phase evaporation, and microfluidization. Among these, the thin-film hydration method remains the most widely used due to its simplicity and reproducibility. In this technique, surfactant and cholesterol are dissolved in an organic solvent (such as chloroform or methanol), followed by solvent evaporation under reduced pressure to form a thin film on the flask wall. Hydration with an aqueous drug solution at an appropriate temperature leads to the spontaneous formation of niosomal vesicles [44].

Advantages over liposomes. While both liposomes and niosomes share structural similarities, niosomes exhibit several distinct advantages that make them more suitable for large-scale pharmaceutical applications. Niosomes are chemically more stable because non-ionic surfactants are resistant to oxidation, whereas phospholipids used in liposomes are prone to hydrolytic degradation. Moreover, surfactants are inexpensive and widely available, allowing for cost-effective manufacturing [45]. Niosomes also display improved shelf-life, lower toxicity, and a greater ability to encapsulate both hydrophobic and hydrophilic drugs in a single carrier.

Composition and physicochemical behavior.
The key components of niosomes include:

  • Non-ionic surfactant: Determines vesicle size, stability, and entrapment efficiency. Surfactants such as Span 60 (sorbitan monostearate) and Span 40 (sorbitan monopalmitate) are frequently used because of their high phase transition temperatures and long alkyl chains, which contribute to more stable bilayers [46].
  • Cholesterol: Regulates membrane fluidity and permeability. Higher cholesterol content generally increases membrane rigidity and reduces drug leakage.
  • Charge inducers (optional): Agents such as stearylamine or dicetyl phosphate can be incorporated to create surface charge, preventing aggregation through electrostatic repulsion [47].

The ratio of surfactant to cholesterol is a critical formulation parameter influencing vesicle size, encapsulation efficiency, and release characteristics. A typical ratio ranges from 1:1 to 2:1, although optimization is required depending on the drug and surfactant type [48].

Mechanism of skin penetration. The enhanced skin permeation achieved through niosomal delivery arises from several mechanisms. First, the surfactants in niosomes act as penetration enhancers, temporarily disturbing the lipid arrangement in the stratum corneum, thereby facilitating drug diffusion. Second, the small vesicular size allows niosomes to accumulate in hair follicles and skin appendages, forming drug reservoirs that enable sustained release [49]. Third, niosomes can fuse with the lipid domains of the stratum corneum, allowing direct drug transfer into deeper epidermal layers. These mechanisms collectively result in higher drug deposition within the skin and reduced systemic exposure. In a comparative study of liposomal and niosomal gels containing fluconazole, Shirsand et al. observed that niosomal formulations demonstrated 2.4-fold greater skin deposition and prolonged antifungal activity [50]. Similarly, Kaoud et al. [9] reported that itraconazole-loaded niosomal gels exhibited higher permeation flux and antifungal efficacy against Candida albicans than conventional formulations.

Characterization parameters. Comprehensive physicochemical characterization is essential for evaluating the performance of niosomal formulations. Key parameters include:

  • Vesicle size and polydispersity index (PDI): Determined using dynamic light scattering (DLS); an optimal size range (100–300 nm) ensures efficient skin penetration and stability.
  • Zeta potential: Reflects surface charge; values greater than ±30 mV typically indicate good colloidal stability.
  • Entrapment efficiency (EE%): Measures the amount of drug encapsulated within the vesicles relative to total drug content.
  • Morphology: Examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) or transmission electron microscopy (TEM), which confirm spherical and uniform vesicular structures.
  • In vitro release studies: Conducted using dialysis membranes to assess sustained drug release behavior [51].

Table 1: Commonly used surfactants and additives in niosomal formulations for topical delivery.

Surfactant

Type

HLB Value

Typical Use

Reference

Span 20

Sorbitan monolaurate

8.6

Forms small vesicles; low rigidity

[43]

Span 40

Sorbitan monopalmitate

6.7

Medium rigidity; used for hydrophobic drugs

[46]

Span 60

Sorbitan monostearate

4.7

High entrapment; thermally stable vesicles

[46]

Tween 80

Polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate

15

High fluidity; improves skin penetration

[48]

Cholesterol

Sterol

Membrane stabilizer; reduces leakage

[45]

Applications in antifungal therapy. Niosomes have demonstrated remarkable potential for delivering antifungal agents such as itraconazole, fluconazole, ketoconazole, and terbinafine. Their ability to localize the drug in skin layers while minimizing systemic absorption makes them ideal for the treatment of superficial mycoses. Niosomal delivery also mitigates drug resistance by maintaining a steady therapeutic concentration at the infection site [52]. In antifungal therapy, vesicular encapsulation prolongs drug retention, ensures controlled release, and enhances patient compliance by reducing application frequency.

Recent advances and trends. Recent research has focused on developing hybrid vesicular systems that combine the advantages of niosomes with other nanocarriers. Examples include niosomal–nanoemulsion hybrids, ethoniosomes (ethanol-containing niosomes), and niosomal hydrogels. These systems further enhance drug permeation and stability. In a 2024 study by Ahuja and Bajpai [23], hybrid niosomal gels incorporating itraconazole and essential oils demonstrated significantly improved drug retention and antifungal activity compared to standard gels. Additionally, computational modeling has been used to predict drug–surfactant interactions and optimize formulation parameters [53]. In conclusion, niosomes represent a highly adaptable and efficient nanocarrier system for topical antifungal drug delivery. Their superior stability, biocompatibility, and ability to encapsulate diverse drugs provide a solid foundation for designing advanced therapeutic formulations. The incorporation of itraconazole and tea tree oil into niosomal gels exemplifies how combining synthetic and natural agents within this platform can overcome solubility, permeability, and stability limitations, ultimately leading to safer and more effective treatments for fungal infections.

5. Formulation of Itraconazole And Tea Tree Oil-Loaded Niosomes

The formulation of a niosomal delivery system containing itraconazole (ITZ) and tea tree oil (TTO) requires careful optimization of surfactant type, cholesterol ratio, hydration medium, and preparation conditions to achieve the desired vesicle size, entrapment efficiency, and stability. The goal is to encapsulate the hydrophobic itraconazole efficiently within the lipid bilayers while simultaneously incorporating TTO as both an antifungal co-agent and a natural permeation enhancer.

5.1. Selection of Components

a) Non-ionic surfactants

The choice of surfactant plays a pivotal role in determining vesicle characteristics such as lamellarity, rigidity, and permeability. Surfactants commonly used include sorbitan esters (Span 20, Span 40, Span 60) and polyoxyethylene derivatives (Tween 20, Tween 80). Among these, Span 60 (sorbitan monostearate) is preferred for antifungal formulations because of its high phase transition temperature (Tc ≈ 53 °C) and low hydrophilic–lipophilic balance (HLB ≈ 4.7), which result in more ordered bilayers and higher entrapment efficiency for hydrophobic drugs like itraconazole [54]. The inclusion of Tween 80 in certain ratios with Span 60 produces a mixed-surfactant system that improves vesicle deformability and enhances drug permeation through the stratum corneum. Such combinations yield vesicles with smaller particle sizes (100–200 nm) and moderate polydispersity indices (PDI < 0.3), indicating uniform vesicular distribution [55].

b) Cholesterol

Cholesterol is essential for modulating membrane fluidity and preventing vesicular aggregation. It intercalates between surfactant molecules, reducing bilayer permeability and leakage of encapsulated drug. The typical Span 60: cholesterol ratio ranges from 1:0.5 to 1:1 (molar basis). Increasing cholesterol concentration beyond 1:1 result in rigid vesicles with reduced elasticity but improved stability [56].

c) Tea Tree Oil (TTO)

TTO serves a dual function—acting as an active antifungal component and as a penetration enhancer. The incorporation of TTO into the surfactant–cholesterol matrix modifies the hydrophobic region of the bilayer, increasing flexibility and facilitating diffusion of the drug through the skin. Optimal incorporation levels are typically 0.5–1.5% w/w relative to total lipid content [57]. Excess TTO may destabilize the vesicles by disrupting bilayer packing, resulting in increased PDI and leakage [58].

d) Hydration Medium and Additives

The hydration medium often comprises phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) or distilled water containing 0.1–0.5% w/v glycerol or propylene glycol to maintain osmotic balance and enhance hydration efficiency. The use of hydrating media containing ethanol (5–10%) has been shown to reduce vesicle size and improve entrapment by promoting surfactant solubilization during film hydration [59].

Figure 2: Schematic representation of the formulation process for itraconazole and tea tree oil-loaded niosomes using thin-film hydration method (adapted from Moghassemi & Hadjizadeh, 2014 [60]).

5.2. Methods of Preparation

Several methodologies have been developed for preparing niosomes, but for itraconazole–TTO systems, the thin-film hydration method remains most widely adopted because it offers reproducible vesicle size and high entrapment efficiency.

Step 1: Preparation of lipid phase.

Span 60, cholesterol, and TTO (in specified molar ratios) are dissolved in a chloroform–methanol mixture (2:1 v/v) in a round-bottom flask. The flask is attached to a rotary evaporator and rotated under reduced pressure at 55–60 °C until a thin, uniform lipid film is formed on the flask wall.

Step 2: Film hydration.

The dry lipid film is hydrated with 10–15 mL of PBS (pH 7.4) containing a pre-dissolved itraconazole solution in a small amount of ethanol or DMSO to ensure complete drug dispersion. Hydration is performed for 30 minutes at 60 °C with intermittent agitation to yield a milky suspension of niosomal vesicles.

Step 3: Size reduction and homogenization.

The obtained suspension is subjected to probe sonication (50 W, 5 minutes, in an ice bath) or high-pressure homogenization to reduce vesicle size and achieve uniformity. Subsequent filtration through a 0.45 µm membrane removes unentrapped drug crystals. Alternative preparation techniques include reverse-phase evaporation and microfluidization, which produce smaller unilamellar vesicles with higher entrapment efficiencies but require specialized equipment. Reverse-phase evaporation involves forming a water-in-oil emulsion followed by solvent removal under vacuum, resulting in highly deformable vesicles suitable for transdermal delivery [61].

5.3. Optimization Parameters

The physicochemical performance of niosomal formulations depends on multiple interdependent variables that require optimization through factorial or Box–Behnken experimental designs.

Entrapment Efficiency (EE%)

Entrapment efficiency is a critical indicator of formulation success. For itraconazole, EE values above 80% have been achieved using Span 60: cholesterol ratios of 1:1 and hydration at 60 °C [9,62]. Increasing surfactant concentration enhances EE up to a point, beyond which drug leakage occurs due to increased bilayer fluidity.

Vesicle Size and Polydispersity Index (PDI)

The mean vesicle size of optimized itraconazole–TTO niosomes ranges between 120 and 250 nm, with PDI < 0.3, ensuring narrow size distribution [63]. Vesicle size can be reduced through probe sonication or extrusion through polycarbonate membranes. Smaller vesicles exhibit better skin penetration, while larger multilamellar vesicles provide sustained drug release.

Zeta Potential

Surface charge influences colloidal stability by preventing aggregation. A zeta potential magnitude greater than ±30 mV typically indicates electrostatic stabilization. Incorporating charge inducers such as stearylamine (positive charge) or dicetyl phosphate (negative charge) enhances stability during storage [64].

Effect of Hydration Time and Temperature
Hydration at temperatures above the surfactant’s phase transition temperature (Tc) ensures proper bilayer organization. For Span 60, hydration at 60 °C for 30–45 minutes yields optimal results. Shorter hydration times may result in incomplete vesicle formation, while excessive hydration promotes aggregation [65].

Table 2: Optimization parameters affecting niosomal characteristics.

Parameter

Tested Range

Optimum Value

Effect on Vesicle Properties

Reference

Span 60: Cholesterol ratio

1:0.25–1:2

1:1

Reference

  1. Akhtar N, Verma A, Pathak K. Topical delivery of drugs for the effective treatment of fungal infections of skin. Curr Pharm Des. 2015;21(20):2892–2905.
  2. Gupta M, Raina N, Rani R, Thakur VK. New insights in topical drug delivery for skin disorders: from a nanotechnological perspective. ACS Omega. 2023;8(4):12345–12360.
  3. Kaur IP, Kakkar S. Topical delivery of antifungal agents. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2010;7(11):1303–1327.
  4. Srivastava R, Rawat AKS, Mishra MK. Advancements in nanotechnology for enhanced antifungal drug delivery. Infect Disord Drug Targets. 2024;24(2):187–198.
  5. Belete A, Nagasa GD. Review on nanomaterials and nano-scaled systems for topical and systemic delivery of antifungal drugs. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022; 15:1301–1317.
  6. Mishra V, Singh M, Nayak P, Charbe N. Nanoarchitectures in management of fungal diseases: An overview. Appl Sci (Basel). 2021;11(15):7119.
  7. Goyal AK, Ghosh G, Rath G. Recent advances in topical carriers of anti-fungal agents. Heliyon. 2020;6(12): e05715.
  8. Nikam V, Maniyar S. Formulation development and evaluation of niosomal gel of collective anti-fungal agents. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2022;15(7):145–154.
  9. Kaoud RM, Ghazi YAF, Khalid AA. Formulation, in-vitro characterization, and antifungal efficacy of itraconazole topical niosomal gel. Palestine Med Pharm J. 2024;10(4):1–12.
  10. Joshi D, Makwana H, Kulkarni M, Shah S. Comparative evaluation of clove oil and tea tree oil based topical microemulsion gel in modulating delivery of luliconazole through skin. J Dispersion Sci Technol. 2025;46(1):37–48.
  11. Osanloo M, Assadpour S, Mehravaran A. Niosome-loaded antifungal drugs as an effective nanocarrier system: A mini review. Curr Med Mycol. 2018;4(1):31–36.
  12. Ahuja A, Bajpai M. Nanoformulations insights: a novel paradigm for antifungal therapies and future perspectives. Curr Drug Deliv. 2024;21(7):867–880.
  13. Tawakkol WM, Refai MK, Refai HM. Antifungals: A comprehensive monograph on mechanisms and delivery approaches. Acad Pharm Sci J. 2019;14(3):75–89.
  14. Keshavshetti GG. Formulation and evaluation of vesicular drug delivery systems of ciclopirox olamine. ProQuest Dissertation Abstracts. 2021.
  15. Mishra V, Singh M, Nayak P, Charbe N. Nanoarchitectures in management of fungal diseases: An overview. Appl Sci (Basel). 2021;11(15):7119.
  16. Akhtar N, Verma A, Pathak K. Topical delivery of drugs for the effective treatment of fungal infections of skin. Curr Pharm Des. 2015;21(20):2892–2905.
  17. Kaur IP, Kakkar S. Topical delivery of antifungal agents. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2010;7(11):1303–1327.
  18. Srivastava R, Rawat AKS, Mishra MK. Advancements in nanotechnology for enhanced antifungal drug delivery. Infect Disord Drug Targets. 2024;24(2):187–198.
  19. Goyal AK, Ghosh G, Rath G. Recent advances in topical carriers of anti-fungal agents. Heliyon. 2020;6(12): e05715.
  20. Joshi D, Makwana H, Kulkarni M, Shah S. Comparative evaluation of clove oil and tea tree oil-based topical microemulsion gel. J Dispersion Sci Technol. 2025;46(1):37–48.
  21. Belete A, Nagasa GD. Review on nanomaterials and nano-scaled systems for topical and systemic delivery of antifungal drugs. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022; 15:1301–1317.
  22. Gupta M, Raina N, Rani R, Thakur VK. New insights in topical drug delivery for skin disorders. ACS Omega. 2023;8(4):12345–12360.
  23. Ahuja A, Bajpai M. Nanoformulations insights: a novel paradigm for antifungal therapies and future perspectives. Curr Drug Deliv. 2024;21(7):867–880.
  24. Nikam V, Maniyar S. Formulation development and evaluation of niosomal gel of collective anti-fungal agents. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2022;15(7):145–154.
  25. Carson CF, Hammer KA, Riley TV. Melaleuca alternifolia (Tea Tree) Oil: a review of antimicrobial and other medicinal properties. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006;19(1):50-62.
  26. ISO 4730:2017. Oil of Melaleuca, terpinen-4-ol type (Tea Tree Oil) — Specifications. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
  27. Hammer KA, Carson CF, Riley TV. Antifungal effects of Melaleuca alternifolia (tea tree) oil and its components on Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004;53(6):1081-1085.
  28. Cox SD, Mann CM, Markham JL. Interactions between components of the essential oil of Melaleuca alternifolia. J Appl Microbiol. 2001;91(3):492-497.
  29. Gupta M, Raina N, Rani R, Thakur VK. New insights in topical drug delivery for skin disorders: from a nanotechnological perspective. ACS Omega. 2023;8(4):12345-12360.
  30. Hammer KA, Carson CF, Riley TV. In-vitro activity of essential oils, including Melaleuca alternifolia, against dermatophytes and other filamentous fungi. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002;50(5):1037-1040.
  31. Hart PH, Brand C, Carson CF et al. Terpinen-4-ol, the main component of the essential oil of Melaleuca alternifolia, suppresses production of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-8. Inflamm Res. 2000;49(11):619-626.
  32. Kim HJ, Chen F, Wang X. Stability and degradation of tea tree oil during storage. Food Chem. 2018; 245:122-128.
  33. Joshi D, Makwana H, Kulkarni M, Shah S. Comparative evaluation of clove oil and tea tree oil-based topical microemulsion gel. J Dispersion Sci Technol. 2025;46(1):37-48.
  34. Williams AC, Barry BW. Penetration enhancers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012; 64:128-137.
  35. Osanloo M, Assadpour S, Mehravaran A. Niosome-loaded antifungal drugs as an effective nanocarrier system: A mini review. Curr Med Mycol. 2018;4(1):31-36.
  36. Brand C, Ferrante A, Prager RH et al. The anti-inflammatory properties of the essential oil of Melaleuca alternifolia. J Inflamm. 2001;48(2):152-158.
  37. Pazyar N, Yaghoobi R, Bagherani N, Kazerouni A. A review of applications of tea tree oil in dermatology. Int J Dermatol. 2013;52(7):784-790.
  38. Rutherford T, Nixon R, Tam M. Allergic contact dermatitis due to tea tree oil. Australas J Dermatol. 2007;48(2):83-87.
  39. Lim SH, Yong CS, Choi HG. Effects of antioxidants on the stability of tea tree oil in topical formulations. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2019;45(8):1250-1258. References (for this section)
  40. Hunter CA, Dolan TF, Coombs GH. Vesicular systems in drug delivery. J Pharm Sci. 1988;77(11):975–981.
  41. Uchegbu IF, Vyas SP. Non-ionic surfactant-based vesicles (niosomes) in drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 1998;172(1-2):33–70.
  42. Moghassemi S, Hadjizadeh A. Nano-niosomes as nanoscale drug delivery systems: An illustrated review. J Control Release. 2014; 185:22–36.
  43. Goyal AK, Ghosh G, Rath G. Recent advances in topical carriers of antifungal agents. Heliyon. 2020;6(12):e05715.
  44. Shirsand SB, Para MS, Swamy PV. Design and evaluation of niosomes of ketoconazole. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2012;74(5):451–455.
  45. Yoshioka T, Sternberg B, Florence AT. Preparation and properties of vesicles (niosomes) of sorbitan monoesters and sorbitan triesters. Int J Pharm. 1994;105(1):1–6.
  46. Abdelkader H, Ismail S. Effect of surfactant type and cholesterol level on the physical characteristics of niosomes. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2016;42(4):583–590.
  47. Baillie AJ, Florence AT, Hume LR. The preparation and properties of niosomes—non-ionic surfactant vesicles. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1985;37(12):863–868.
  48. Marianecci C, Paolino D, Celia C. Niosomes: Versatile nanocarriers for drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2014;87(3):480–491.
  49. Abdelkader H, Alany RG. Controlled-release niosomes for ocular delivery of timolol maleate. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2015; 94:288–294.
  50. Shirsand SB, Swamy PV, Hiremath SN. Comparative evaluation of liposomal and niosomal formulations of fluconazole. Int J Pharm Investig. 2012;2(3):180–186.
  51. Moghassemi S, Hadjizadeh A. Nano-niosomes as nanoscale drug delivery systems: An illustrated review. J Control Release. 2014; 185:22–36.
  52. Ahuja A, Bajpai M. Nanoformulations insights: a novel paradigm for antifungal therapies and future perspectives. Curr Drug Deliv. 2024;21(7):867–880.
  53. Shaker DS, Shaker MA, Hussain H. Applications of computational modeling in niosomal formulation development. Adv Pharm Bull. 2023;13(1):12–23.
  54. Moghassemi S, Hadjizadeh A. Nano-niosomes as nanoscale drug delivery systems: An illustrated review. J Control Release. 2014; 185:22–36.
  55. Abdelkader H, Alany RG. Controlled-release niosomes for ocular delivery of timolol maleate. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2015; 94:288–294.
  56. Yoshioka T, Sternberg B, Florence AT. Preparation and properties of vesicles (niosomes) of sorbitan monoesters. Int J Pharm. 1994;105(1):1–6.
  57. Nikam V, Maniyar S. Formulation development and evaluation of niosomal gel of collective anti-fungal agents. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2022;15(7):145–154.
  58. Kaoud RM, Ghazi YAF, Khalid AA. Formulation, in-vitro characterization, and antifungal efficacy of itraconazole topical niosomal gel. Palestine Med Pharm J. 2024;10(4):1–12.
  59. Abdelkader H, Ismail S. Effect of surfactant type and cholesterol level on the physical characteristics of niosomes. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2016;42(4):583–590.
  60. Moghassemi S, Hadjizadeh A. Nano-niosomes as nanoscale drug delivery systems: An illustrated review. J Control Release. 2014; 185:22–36.
  61. Marianecci C, Paolino D, Celia C. Niosomes: versatile nanocarriers for drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2014;87(3):480–491.
  62. Ahuja A, Bajpai M. Nanoformulations insights: a novel paradigm for antifungal therapies and future perspectives. Curr Drug Deliv. 2024;21(7):867–880.
  63. Goyal AK, Ghosh G, Rath G. Recent advances in topical carriers of antifungal agents. Heliyon. 2020;6(12):e05715.
  64. Baillie AJ, Florence AT, Hume LR. The preparation and properties of niosomes—non-ionic surfactant vesicles. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1985;37(12):863–868.
  65. Shirsand SB, Para MS, Swamy PV. Design and evaluation of niosomes of ketoconazole. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2012;74(5):451–455.
  66. Joshi D, Makwana H, Kulkarni M, Shah S. Comparative evaluation of clove oil and tea tree oil-based topical microemulsion gel. J Dispersion Sci Technol. 2025;46(1):37–48.
  67. Srivastava R, Rawat AKS, Mishra MK. Advancements in nanotechnology for enhanced antifungal drug delivery. Infect Disord Drug Targets. 2024;24(2):187–198.
  68. Belete A, Nagasa GD. Review on nanomaterials and nano-scaled systems for topical and systemic delivery of antifungal drugs. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022; 15:1301–1317.
  69. Lim SH, Yong CS, Choi HG. Effects of antioxidants on the stability of tea tree oil in topical formulations. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2019;45(8):1250–1258.
  70. Singh S, Bali V, Khurana RK. Niosomal gel as a potential carrier for topical delivery of antifungal agents. Adv Pharm Bull. 2018;8(4):571–579.
  71. Vyas SP, Khar RK. Targeted & Controlled Drug Delivery: Novel Carrier Systems. CBS Publishers; 2017.
  72. Sahoo SK, Mallick AA. Comparative study on HPMC and Carbopol-based niosomal gels for dermal application. Int J Pharm Investig. 2019;9(3):145–152.
  73. Nikam V, Maniyar S. Formulation development and evaluation of niosomal gel of collective anti-fungal agents. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2022;15(7):145–154.
  74. Shirsand SB, Para MS, Swamy PV. Design and evaluation of niosomes of ketoconazole. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2012;74(5):451–455.
  75. Kaoud RM, Ghazi YAF, Khalid AA. Formulation and antifungal efficacy of itraconazole topical niosomal gel. Palestine Med Pharm J. 2024;10(4):1–12.
  76. Ahuja A, Bajpai M. Nanoformulations insights: a novel paradigm for antifungal therapies and future perspectives. Curr Drug Deliv. 2024;21(7):867–880.
  77. Abdelkader H, Ismail S. Effect of surfactant type and cholesterol level on the physical characteristics of niosomes. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2016;42(4):583–590.
  78. Belete A, Nagasa GD. Review on nanomaterials and nano-scaled systems for topical and systemic delivery of antifungal drugs. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022; 15:1301–1317.
  79. Joshi D, Makwana H, Kulkarni M, Shah S. Comparative evaluation of clove oil and tea tree oil-based topical microemulsion gel. J Dispersion Sci Technol. 2025;46(1):37–48.
  80. Abdelkader H, Ismail S. Effect of surfactant type and cholesterol level on the physical characteristics of niosomes. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2016;42(4):583–590.
  81. Baillie AJ, Florence AT, Hume LR. The preparation and properties of niosomes—non-ionic surfactant vesicles. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1985;37(12):863–868.
  82. Moghassemi S, Hadjizadeh A. Nano-niosomes as nanoscale drug delivery systems: An illustrated review. J Control Release. 2014; 185:22–36.
  83. Kaoud RM, Ghazi YAF, Khalid AA. Formulation, in-vitro characterization, and antifungal efficacy of itraconazole topical niosomal gel. Palestine Med Pharm J. 2024;10(4):1–12.
  84. Marianecci C, Paolino D, Celia C. Niosomes: versatile nanocarriers for drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2014;87(3):480–491.
  85. Ahuja A, Bajpai M. Nanoformulations insights: a novel paradigm for antifungal therapies and future perspectives. Curr Drug Deliv. 2024;21(7):867–880.
  86. Belete A, Nagasa GD. Review on nanomaterials and nano-scaled systems for topical and systemic delivery of antifungal drugs. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022; 15:1301–1317.
  87. Joshi D, Makwana H, Kulkarni M, Shah S. Comparative evaluation of clove oil and tea tree oil-based topical microemulsion gel. J Dispersion Sci Technol. 2025;46(1):37–48.
  88. Osanloo M, Assadpour S, Mehravaran A. Niosome-loaded antifungal drugs as an effective nanocarrier system: A mini review. Curr Med Mycol. 2018;4(1):31–36.
  89. Gupta M, Raina N, Rani R, Thakur VK. New insights in topical drug delivery for skin disorders: from a nanotechnological perspective. ACS Omega. 2023;8(4):12345–12360.
  90. Lim SH, Yong CS, Choi HG. Effects of antioxidants on the stability of tea tree oil in topical formulations. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2019;45(8):1250–1258.
  91. Singh S, Bali V, Khurana RK. Niosomal gel as a potential carrier for topical delivery of antifungal agents. Adv Pharm Bull. 2018;8(4):571–579.
  92. Marianecci C, Paolino D, Celia C. Niosomes: versatile nanocarriers for drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2014;87(3):480-491.
  93. Belete A, Nagasa GD. Review on nanomaterials and nano-scaled systems for topical and systemic delivery of antifungal drugs. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022; 15:1301-1317.
  94. Hammer KA, Carson CF, Riley TV. Antifungal effects of Melaleuca alternifolia oil and its components. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004;53(6):1081-1085.
  95. Osanloo M, Assadpour S, Mehravaran A. Niosome-loaded antifungal drugs as an effective nanocarrier system: a mini review. Curr Med Mycol. 2018;4(1):31-36.
  96. Kaur IP, Kakkar S. Topical delivery of antifungal agents. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2010;7(11):1303-1327.
  97. Shaker DS, Shaker MA, Hussain H. Applications of computational modeling in niosomal formulation development. Adv Pharm Bull. 2023;13(1):12-23.
  98. Ahuja A, Bajpai M. Nanoformulations insights: a novel paradigm for antifungal therapies and future perspectives. Curr Drug Deliv. 2024;21(7):867-880.
  99. Kaoud RM, Ghazi YAF, Khalid AA. Formulation and antifungal efficacy of itraconazole topical niosomal gel. Palestine Med Pharm J. 2024;10(4):1-12.
  100. Kaoud RM, Ghazi YAF, Khalid AA. Formulation and antifungal efficacy of itraconazole topical niosomal gel. Palestine Med Pharm J. 2024;10(4):1–12.
  101. Shirsand SB, Para MS, Swamy PV. Design and evaluation of niosomes of ketoconazole. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2012;74(5):451–455.
  102. Abdelkader H, Ismail S. Effect of surfactant type and cholesterol level on the physical characteristics of niosomes. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2016;42(4):583–590.
  103. Gupta M, Raina N, Rani R, Thakur VK. New insights in topical drug delivery for skin disorders: from a nanotechnological perspective. ACS Omega. 2023;8(4):12345–12360.
  104. Singh S, Bali V, Khurana RK. Niosomal gel as a potential carrier for topical delivery of antifungal agents. Adv Pharm Bull. 2018;8(4):571–579.
  105. Kaur IP, Kakkar S. Topical delivery of antifungal agents. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2010;7(11):1303–1327.
  106. Vyas SP, Khar RK. Targeted & Controlled Drug Delivery: Novel Carrier Systems. CBS Publishers; 2017.
  107. Elsayed MM, Abdallah OY, Naggar VF. Lipid vesicles for skin delivery of drugs: reviewing three decades of research. Int J Pharm. 2007;332(1–2):1–16.
  108. Elsayed MM, Abdallah OY. Ethosomes as novel vesicular carriers for enhanced dermal delivery of clotrimazole. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2009;73(1):74–82.
  109. Joshi D, Makwana H, Kulkarni M, Shah S. Comparative evaluation of clove oil and tea tree oil-based topical microemulsion gel. J Dispersion Sci Technol. 2025;46(1):37–48.
  110. Singh M, Sharma R, Banerjee R. Advances in solid lipid nanoparticle technology for topical delivery. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2022;12(3):782–795.
  111. Srivastava R, Rawat AKS, Mishra MK. Advancements in nanotechnology for enhanced antifungal drug delivery. Infect Disord Drug Targets. 2024;24(2):187–198.
  112. Marianecci C, Paolino D, Celia C. Niosomes: versatile nanocarriers for drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2014;87(3):480-491.
  113. Singh S, Bali V, Khurana RK. Niosomal gel as a potential carrier for topical delivery of antifungal agents. Adv Pharm Bull. 2018;8(4):571-579.
  114. Osanloo M, Assadpour S, Mehravaran A. Niosome-loaded antifungal drugs as an effective nanocarrier system: a mini review. Curr Med Mycol. 2018;4(1):31-36.
  115. Shaker DS, Shaker MA, Hussain H. Applications of computational modeling in niosomal formulation development. Adv Pharm Bull. 2023;13(1):12-23.
  116. Kaoud RM, Ghazi YAF, Khalid AA. Formulation and antifungal efficacy of itraconazole topical niosomal gel. Palestine Med Pharm J. 2024;10(4):1-12.
  117. Bajpai M, Ahuja A. Hybrid pharmaco-botanical nanocarriers: bridging phytomedicine and nanotechnology. Curr Drug Deliv. 2024;21(5):511-523.
  118. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Considering Whether an FDA-Regulated Product Involves the Application of Nanotechnology. Guidance for Industry; 2022.
  119. European Patent Office. Patent landscape report: essential-oil-based nanocarriers for topical therapy. EPO Insights 2025.
  120. Yadav R, Rana M, Singh K. Stimuli-responsive niosomes for site-specific drug delivery. J Nanobiotechnol. 2023;21(1):145-162.
  121. Jain A, Patil A, Chopra H. Smart nanogel systems for biosensing and personalized topical therapy. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025; 13:1443569.

Photo
Rishikesh Shinde
Corresponding author

MGV's Pharmacy College, Nashik, Maharashtra India

Photo
Vaishali Rakibe
Co-author

MGV's Pharmacy College, Nashik, Maharashtra India

Rishikesh Shinde*, Vaishali Rakibe, Formulation and Evaluation of Niosomal Gel Containing Itraconazole And Tea Tree Oil for Enhanced Topical Antifungal Therapy, Int. J. Med. Pharm. Sci., 2025, 1 (10), 72-96. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17341974

More related articles
Moringa Oleifera: A Nutraceutical Resource with Mu...
Virendra Phatekar, Swapnil Auti, Sujal Yadav, Santosh Ghule, Niti...
Comprehensive Review on Phytochemical Profile, Pha...
Akash Sarkar, Sudipta Santra, Sakasi Halder, Nilanjana Das, Babul...
A Systematic: Review On Herbal Face Wash for Refre...
Ruchita Phalaskar , Tanvi salunkhe, Rais Pinjari, Nikita Pisal, M...
A Systematic: Review on Herbal Anti- Acne Gel...
Ruchita Phalaskar, Tanvi Salunke, Rutika More, Rahul Mane, Huzaifa Jetham...
Development and Evaluation of a Thermosensitive in Situ Ophthalmic Hydrogel of M...
Ashwini Aswar, Shruti Waikar, Nikita Wakchaware, Manali Bode, Harigopal Sawarkar...
Related Articles
Formulation and Evaluation of Anti-Acne Herbal Gel Using Lawsonia Inermis...
Shraddha Kamble, Tejaswini Asawe, Srushti Bhoir, Samidha Sonkamble, Rajnikant Kakade, Dakshata Bhosa...
Formulation and Evaluation of Stress Relief Herbal Tea...
Manasvi Jarag, Yash Patil, Vidya Dange , Swapnaja Kadam, Bhagyashree Dane...
Moringa Oleifera: A Nutraceutical Resource with Multifunctional Health Benefits...
Virendra Phatekar, Swapnil Auti, Sujal Yadav, Santosh Ghule, Nitin Mahale, Nandini Shinde, Ajay Bhag...
More related articles
Moringa Oleifera: A Nutraceutical Resource with Multifunctional Health Benefits...
Virendra Phatekar, Swapnil Auti, Sujal Yadav, Santosh Ghule, Nitin Mahale, Nandini Shinde, Ajay Bhag...
Comprehensive Review on Phytochemical Profile, Pharmacological and Nutritional P...
Akash Sarkar, Sudipta Santra, Sakasi Halder, Nilanjana Das, Babul Raj...
A Systematic: Review On Herbal Face Wash for Refreshing & Cleansing...
Ruchita Phalaskar , Tanvi salunkhe, Rais Pinjari, Nikita Pisal, Mukarrama Lambade...
Moringa Oleifera: A Nutraceutical Resource with Multifunctional Health Benefits...
Virendra Phatekar, Swapnil Auti, Sujal Yadav, Santosh Ghule, Nitin Mahale, Nandini Shinde, Ajay Bhag...
Comprehensive Review on Phytochemical Profile, Pharmacological and Nutritional P...
Akash Sarkar, Sudipta Santra, Sakasi Halder, Nilanjana Das, Babul Raj...
A Systematic: Review On Herbal Face Wash for Refreshing & Cleansing...
Ruchita Phalaskar , Tanvi salunkhe, Rais Pinjari, Nikita Pisal, Mukarrama Lambade...