View Article

  • Artificial Intelligence-Driven Design and Optimization of Aerosolized Lorlatinib Nanocarriers for Precision Lung Cancer Therapy: Current Advances, Challenges, and Future Perspectives

  • Department of Pharmacy, Indore Mahavidyalaya Jambudi Hapsi, Opposite Pitra Parvat, Indore 453112

Abstract

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality despite significant advances in targeted therapeutics. Lorlatinib, a third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and ROS1 inhibitor, has demonstrated remarkable efficacy against resistant mutations and central nervous system metastases. However, oral administration is associated with systemic toxicity, variable pharmacokinetics, and limited tumor-specific targeting. Pulmonary delivery of Lorlatinib-loaded nanoparticles has emerged as a promising strategy for enhancing local drug concentrations while minimizing systemic exposure. Simultaneously, artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming pharmaceutical development through predictive modeling, formulation optimization, computational toxicology, and personalized treatment planning. This review critically examines the integration of AI technologies with aerosolized Lorlatinib nanomedicine for precision lung cancer therapy. The article discusses nanoparticle engineering, pulmonary deposition mechanisms, machine learning-assisted formulation development, digital twin technologies, computational fluid dynamics modeling, and AI-driven patient stratification approaches. Current challenges including regulatory considerations, model interpretability, data availability, and translational barriers are analyzed. Furthermore, future opportunities involving generative AI, autonomous formulation platforms, and personalized aerosol therapeutics are explored. The convergence of nanotechnology, pulmonary drug delivery, and artificial intelligence represents a transformative paradigm in precision oncology that may substantially improve treatment outcomes in ALK-positive NSCLC patients.

Keywords

Lorlatinib, Artificial Intelligence, Nanomedicine, Pulmonary Drug Delivery, Aerosolized Nanoparticles, Precision Oncology, Machine Learning, NSCLC

Introduction

× Popup Image

Lung cancer continues to represent one of the most significant public health challenges worldwide, accounting for millions of new diagnoses and deaths annually. NSCLC constitutes approximately 85% of all lung cancer cases and remains a major contributor to cancer-associated mortality. Advances in molecular oncology have enabled the identification of specific genetic alterations responsible for tumor progression, leading to the development of targeted therapeutic approaches. Among these molecular targets, ALK rearrangements have emerged as critical oncogenic drivers. The development of ALK inhibitors has significantly improved clinical outcomes in affected patients. Lorlatinib represents a third-generation ALK inhibitor specifically designed to overcome resistance mutations that frequently develop during treatment with earlier-generation agents. Despite impressive therapeutic efficacy, conventional oral administration of Lorlatinib presents several limitations. Systemic exposure contributes to adverse effects including hyperlipidemia, neurocognitive disturbances, peripheral edema, and cardiovascular complications. Furthermore, oral administration cannot selectively concentrate drug molecules within lung tumors.

Pulmonary drug delivery offers a compelling alternative approach. Direct administration of aerosolized drug formulations into the respiratory tract enables enhanced local drug concentrations while potentially reducing systemic toxicity.

Recent developments in nanotechnology have further expanded the potential of pulmonary drug delivery systems. Nanoparticles provide controlled drug release, enhanced stability, improved cellular uptake, and tumor-targeting capabilities.

Concurrently, AI technologies are revolutionizing pharmaceutical research and development. Machine learning, deep learning, computational modeling, and digital twin technologies are increasingly utilized to optimize drug formulations, predict therapeutic outcomes, and personalize treatment strategies. The convergence of these three rapidly evolving fields—targeted oncology, pulmonary nanomedicine, and artificial intelligence—creates possible opportunities for improving lung cancer treatment.

Figure 1. Artificial Intelligence Integration Across the Development Pipeline of Aerosolized Lorlatinib Nanomedicine.

2. Lorlatinib: Pharmacological Characteristics and Clinical Significance

Lorlatinib is a macrocyclic ATP-competitive tyrosine kinase inhibitor developed to target ALK and ROS1 alterations.

2.1 Molecular Mechanism of Action

Lorlatinib inhibits:

  • ALK phosphorylation
  • ROS1 signaling
  • PI3K/AKT pathway activation
  • MAPK pathway signaling

This inhibition suppresses cellular proliferation and promotes apoptosis in tumor cells harboring ALK rearrangements.

2.2 Advantages Over Earlier-Generation ALK Inhibitors

Key advantages include:

  • Broad mutation coverage
  • CNS penetration
  • Activity against G1202R mutation
  • Improved progression-free survival

Table 1. Comparative Characteristics of Clinically Available ALK Inhibitors

Parameter

Crizotinib

Ceritinib

Alectinib

Lorlatinib

Generation

First

Second

Second

Third

CNS Penetration

Low

Moderate

High

Very High

G1202R Activity

Poor

Limited

Moderate

Excellent

Resistance Coverage

Low

Moderate

High

Very High

3. Rationale for Aerosolized Lorlatinib Nanoparticles

Pulmonary delivery provides unique physiological advantages.

Benefits

  • Direct lung targeting
  • Reduced systemic toxicity
  • Rapid onset
  • Improved bioavailability
  • Lower required dose

Nanoparticles additionally provide:

  • Controlled release
  • Enhanced cellular uptake
  • Improved retention
  • Tumor microenvironment targeting

Figure 2. Proposed Mechanism of Improved Lung Tumor Targeting by Aerosolized Lorlatinib Nanoparticles Compared with Oral Administration.

4. Artificial Intelligence in Nanoparticle Design

AI is rapidly transforming formulation development.

Traditional formulation optimization requires hundreds of experimental trials. Machine learning can identify optimal parameters using substantially fewer experiments.

Important formulation variables include:

  • Particle size
  • Surface charge
  • Drug loading
  • Release kinetics
  • Aerosol performance

Table 2. Machine Learning Applications in Aerosolized Lorlatinib Development

Development Stage

AI Method

Expected Output

Formulation Design

Random Forest

Optimal composition

Particle Engineering

Neural Networks

Particle size prediction

Aerosol Performance

Gradient Boosting

MMAD prediction

Toxicity Prediction

Deep Learning

Safety estimation

Clinical Response

Predictive Analytics

Patient stratification

5. Computational Fluid Dynamics and Pulmonary Deposition Modeling

CFD has emerged as an essential tool for pulmonary drug delivery development.

CFD simulations enable:

  • Airflow analysis
  • Particle trajectory prediction
  • Regional deposition mapping
  • Device optimization

AI-enhanced CFD platforms can analyze millions of deposition scenarios.

Figure 3. AI-Assisted Computational Workflow for Predicting Pulmonary Deposition of Lorlatinib Nanoaerosols.

6. Digital Twins and Personalized Lung Cancer Therapy

Digital twins represent virtual replicas of individual patients.

Components include:

  • CT imaging
  • Genomic data
  • Tumor characteristics
  • Breathing patterns
  • Pharmacokinetic parameters

Potential applications:

  • Dose optimization
  • Toxicity prediction
  • Therapy response simulation
  • Clinical decision support

Table 3. Clinical Applications of Digital Twin Technology in Pulmonary Nanomedicine

Application

Potential Benefit

Dose Selection

Personalized dosing

Deposition Prediction

Improved targeting

Toxicity Assessment

Enhanced safety

Treatment Monitoring

Real-time optimization

7. Generative AI and Future Nanocarrier Discovery

Generative AI models can:

  • Design novel polymers
  • Predict carrier structures
  • Generate optimized formulations
  • Simulate drug-release profiles

This emerging field may dramatically accelerate nanomedicine development.

8. Regulatory and Translational Challenges

Major barriers include:

Scientific Challenges

  • Dataset quality
  • Model reproducibility
  • Biological complexity

Regulatory Challenges

  • AI transparency
  • Model validation
  • Regulatory acceptance

Manufacturing Challenges

  • Scale-up
  • Batch consistency
  • Process control

Figure 4. Translational Roadmap for AI-Driven Aerosolized Lorlatinib Development.

FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

Future research should focus on:

  • Autonomous formulation laboratories
  • Self-learning inhalation systems
  • AI-guided precision oncology
  • Smart nanoparticles
  • Real-time treatment adaptation

The integration of AI, nanotechnology, and pulmonary drug delivery may establish a new paradigm for targeted cancer therapy.

10. Methodological Framework for AI-Assisted Development of Aerosolized Lorlatinib Nanoparticles

10.1 Quality by Design (QbD) Approach

The development of aerosolized Lorlatinib nanoparticles can be guided using the Quality by Design (QbD) framework recommended by regulatory agencies. QbD enables systematic formulation development through predefined objectives and risk-based optimization strategies.

Quality Target Product Profile (QTPP)

The proposed formulation should possess:

  • High lung deposition efficiency
  • Sustained drug release
  • Optimal aerodynamic diameter
  • Minimal systemic exposure
  • Long-term physical stability

Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs)

Important CQAs include:

  • Particle size
  • Zeta potential
  • Drug loading efficiency
  • Entrapment efficiency
  • Fine particle fraction
  • Aerosol performance

Table 4. Proposed QTPP and CQAs for Aerosolized Lorlatinib Nanoparticles

Parameter

Target Value

Aerodynamic Diameter

1–5 μm

Nanoparticle Size

100–300 nm

Entrapment Efficiency

>80%

Zeta Potential

±20–30 mV

Fine Particle Fraction

>50%

10.2 Nanoparticle Preparation Methods

Several formulation methods may be employed.

Solvent Evaporation Method

Suitable for:

  • PLGA nanoparticles
  • Controlled release systems

Advantages:

  • High encapsulation efficiency
  • Scalable manufacturing

Nanoprecipitation Method

Suitable for:

  • Small molecule drugs
  • Rapid preparation

Advantages:

  • Uniform particle size
  • Low energy requirement

High Pressure Homogenization

Suitable for:

  • Solid lipid nanoparticles
  • Nanostructured lipid carriers

Advantages:

  • Industrial scalability
  • Reproducibility

Flowchart

Lorlatinib

Carrier Selection
(PLGA/Lipids/Liposomes)

Nanoparticle Preparation

Physicochemical Characterization

Aerosol Performance Evaluation

AI-Based Optimization

Lead Formulation Selection

Figure 6

Proposed Experimental Workflow for Preparation and Optimization of Aerosolized Lorlatinib Nanoparticles

10.3 Characterization Methods

Particle Size Analysis

Instrument:

  • Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS)

Outcome:

  • Mean particle size
  • Polydispersity index

Surface Charge Analysis

Instrument:

  • Zeta Potential Analyzer

Outcome:

  • Stability prediction

Morphological Evaluation

Instruments:

  • SEM
  • TEM

Outcome:

  • Particle shape
  • Surface structure

Drug Entrapment Efficiency

Method:

  • Centrifugation
  • HPLC analysis

Formula:

EE (%) = (Entrapped Drug) / (Total Drug) *100

10.4 Aerosol Performance Testing

Andersen Cascade Impactor (ACI)

Used to determine:

  • Aerodynamic particle size distribution
  • Fine particle fraction

Next Generation Impactor (NGI)

Used to evaluate:

  • Lung deposition potential
  • Regional aerosol distribution

Table 5. Proposed Experimental Evaluation Methods

Parameter

Method

Particle Size

DLS

Morphology

SEM/TEM

Drug Content

HPLC

Aerosol Performance

NGI/ACI

Release Study

Dialysis Method

Cytotoxicity

MTT Assay

10.5 Artificial Intelligence-Based Optimization

Traditional optimization uses:

  • One-factor-at-a-time studies
  • Design of Experiments (DoE)

AI-enhanced optimization can employ:

Random Forest

Prediction of:

  • Entrapment efficiency
  • Particle size

Artificial Neural Networks

Prediction of:

  • Aerosol performance
  • Drug release profile

Gradient Boosting Models

Prediction of:

  • Fine particle fraction
  • Lung deposition

Figure 7. AI-Driven Optimization Loop for Aerosolized Lorlatinib Formulation Development.

10.6 Proposed Preclinical Evaluation

In Vitro Studies

  • A549 lung cancer cells
  • H3122 ALK-positive NSCLC cells

Endpoints:

  • Cytotoxicity
  • Cellular uptake
  • Apoptosis induction

In Vivo Studies

Animal model:

  • Orthotopic NSCLC mouse model

Evaluations:

  • Lung deposition
  • Biodistribution
  • Pharmacokinetics
  • Tumor inhibition

Figure 8

Proposed Translational Development Pathway from Formulation Design to Clinical Application of Aerosolized Lorlatinib Nanoparticles.

CONCLUSION

The treatment landscape of ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer has undergone a remarkable transformation with the introduction of targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors, among which Lorlatinib represents one of the most advanced therapeutic options currently available. Its ability to overcome multiple resistance mutations and effectively penetrate the central nervous system has established Lorlatinib as a valuable treatment for patients with advanced and treatment-resistant disease. Nevertheless, conventional oral administration remains associated with several challenges, including systemic toxicity, off-target exposure, pharmacokinetic variability, and limited control over drug accumulation at the primary tumor site. These limitations continue to motivate the search for innovative drug delivery strategies capable of improving therapeutic precision while minimizing adverse effects. Pulmonary delivery of Lorlatinib-loaded nanoparticles offers a promising alternative approach by enabling direct drug administration to the lungs, the primary site of disease in most NSCLC patients. The unique physiological characteristics of the pulmonary system, including its large surface area, extensive vascular network, and thin epithelial barriers, provide an attractive platform for localized drug delivery. Through inhalation, aerosolized nanocarriers can potentially achieve higher drug concentrations within lung tumors while reducing systemic exposure and improving the overall therapeutic index. Such an approach may contribute not only to enhanced treatment efficacy but also to improved patient compliance and quality of life. Advances in nanotechnology have significantly expanded the possibilities for pulmonary drug delivery. Nanocarriers such as liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, solid lipid nanoparticles, nanostructured lipid carriers, and hybrid nanosystems provide opportunities to improve drug solubility, control release kinetics, enhance cellular uptake, and promote selective tumor targeting. Furthermore, the ability to engineer nanoparticle surface characteristics offers additional potential for active targeting and prolonged retention within the tumor microenvironment. Collectively, these advantages position nanotechnology as a critical component in the future development of inhalable anticancer therapies. A particularly exciting aspect of this emerging field is the integration of artificial intelligence into the design, optimization, and clinical translation of aerosolized nanomedicines. AI-driven methodologies, including machine learning, deep learning, computational fluid dynamics, digital twins, and predictive analytics, have the capacity to transform traditional pharmaceutical development processes. By identifying complex relationships among formulation variables, predicting aerosol performance, modeling pulmonary deposition patterns, and supporting patient-specific treatment planning, AI can substantially reduce development timelines while increasing formulation efficiency and precision. The convergence of AI with pulmonary nanomedicine represents a powerful multidisciplinary strategy that aligns closely with the goals of precision oncology. Despite these promising opportunities, several scientific, technological, and regulatory challenges remain unresolved. The successful development of aerosolized Lorlatinib nanoparticles will require careful optimization of particle size, aerodynamic behavior, formulation stability, drug loading capacity, and long-term storage characteristics. In addition, the biological complexity of the respiratory system, interpatient variability, and the potential for pulmonary toxicity necessitate rigorous preclinical and clinical evaluation. The implementation of AI-based systems also introduces concerns regarding model transparency, data quality, reproducibility, validation standards, and regulatory acceptance. Addressing these challenges will require close collaboration among pharmaceutical scientists, oncologists, engineers, computational researchers, regulatory authorities, and industry stakeholders. Future research should focus on the development of smart and adaptive nanocarrier systems capable of responding to tumor-specific microenvironmental cues, thereby enabling more precise drug release and improved therapeutic outcomes. The application of generative AI for novel carrier discovery, autonomous formulation platforms for rapid optimization, and digital twin technologies for individualized therapy design may further accelerate progress in this field. Additionally, combining aerosolized Lorlatinib nanocarriers with other therapeutic modalities, such as immunotherapy, gene therapy, or combination targeted therapies, may open new avenues for overcoming resistance mechanisms and improving long-term disease control. From a translational perspective, the integration of aerosol science, nanotechnology, and artificial intelligence has the potential to redefine how targeted therapies are developed and administered for lung cancer. Although aerosolized Lorlatinib nanomedicine remains largely at the conceptual and preclinical stage, the scientific rationale supporting its development is strong and supported by advances across multiple disciplines. Continued innovation and interdisciplinary research will be essential to bridge the gap between laboratory discoveries and clinical implementation. In conclusion, AI-assisted aerosolized Lorlatinib nanoparticles represent a highly promising next-generation strategy for precision lung cancer therapy. By combining the therapeutic power of targeted molecular inhibition with the advantages of localized pulmonary delivery and intelligent computational optimization, this approach has the potential to enhance treatment efficacy, reduce systemic toxicity, and contribute to the evolution of personalized oncology. While considerable work remains before clinical adoption can be achieved, the convergence of these technologies may ultimately establish a new paradigm for the management of ALK-positive NSCLC and serve as a model for future developments in cancer nanomedicine.

Ethical approval:  not applicable

Patient consent: not applicable

Funding:  no fund received.

REFERENCES

  1. Shaw AT, Bauer TM, de Marinis F, Felip E, Goto Y, Liu G, et al First-line lorlatinib or crizotinib in advanced ALK-positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(21):2018–2029.
  2. Solomon BJ, Besse B, Bauer TM, Felip E, Soo RA, Camidge DR, et al Lorlatinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a global phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(12):1654–1667.
  3. Gainor JF, Dardaei L, Yoda S, Friboulet L, Leshchiner I, Katayama R, et al Molecular mechanisms of resistance to first- and second-generation ALK inhibitors in ALK-rearranged lung cancer. Cancer Discov. 2016;6(10):1118–1133.
  4. Camidge DR, Kim HR, Ahn MJ, Yang JC, Han JY, Lee JS, et al Brigatinib versus crizotinib in ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(21):2027–2039.
  5. Peters S, Camidge DR, Shaw AT, Gadgeel S, Ahn JS, Kim DW, et al Alectinib versus crizotinib in untreated ALK-positive NSCLC. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(9):829–838.
  6. Patton JS, Byron PR. Inhaling medicines: delivering drugs to the body through the lungs. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007;6(1):67–74.
  7. Sung JC, Pulliam BL, Edwards DA. Nanoparticles for drug delivery to the lungs. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2007;20(3):241–260.
  8. Carvalho TC, Peters JI, Williams RO. Influence of particle size on regional lung deposition. J Control Release. 2011;150(1):1–14.
  9. Mansour HM, Rhee YS, Wu X. Nanomedicine in pulmonary delivery. Int J Nanomedicine. 2009; 4:299–319.
  10. Paranjpe M, Müller-Goymann CC. Nanoparticle-mediated pulmonary drug delivery. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(4):5852–5873.
  11. Dames P, Gleich B, Flemmer A, Hajek K, Seidl N, Wiekhorst F, et al Targeted delivery of magnetic aerosol droplets to the lung. Nat Nanotechnol. 2007;2(8):495–499.
  12. Ehrhardt C. From nano to smart nanocarriers: pulmonary drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2011;8(6):747–762.
  13. Mehta P, Bothiraja C. Recent advances in inhalable nanocarrier-based systems. Drug Discov Today. 2020;25(11):1988–2001.
  14. Meenach SA, Vogt FG, Anderson KW, Hilt JZ, McGarry RC. Design of inhalable nanoparticle systems for lung cancer therapy. Pharm Res. 2013;30(2):631–648.
  15. Tzeng SY, Green JJ. Therapeutic nanomedicine for brain and lung cancers. Ther Deliv. 2013;4(6):687–704.
  16. Wang AZ, Langer R, Farokhzad OC. Nanoparticle delivery of cancer drugs. Annu Rev Med. 2012; 63:185–198.
  17. Shi J, Kantoff PW, Wooster R, Farokhzad OC. Cancer nanomedicine: progress, challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17(1):20–37.
  18. Bobo D, Robinson KJ, Islam J, Thurecht KJ, Corrie SR, et al Nanoparticle-based medicines: a review of FDA-approved materials. Pharm Res. 2016;33(10):2373–2387.
  19. Mitchell MJ, Billingsley MM, Haley RM, Wechsler ME, Peppas NA, Langer R. Engineering precision nanoparticles. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021;20(2):101–124.
  20. Etheridge ML, Campbell SA, Erdman AG, Haynes CL, Wolf SM, McCullough J. The big picture on nanomedicine. ACS Nano. 2013;7(6):552–556.
  21. Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of AI and human intelligence. Nat Med. 2019;25(1):44–56.
  22. Vamathevan J, Clark D, Czodrowski P, Dunham I, Ferran E, Lee G, et al Applications of machine learning in drug discovery and development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18(6):463–477.
  23. Paul D, Sanap G, Shenoy S, Kalyane D, Kalia K, Tekade RK. Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development. Drug Discov Today. 2021;26(1):80–93.
  24. Ekins S, Puhl AC, Zorn KM, Lane TR, Russo DP, Klein JJ, et al Exploiting machine learning for end-to-end drug discovery and development. Nat Mater. 2019;18(5):435–441.
  25. Chan HP, Samala RK, Hadjiiski LM. Deep learning in medical image analysis. Med Phys. 2020;47(5): e1–e36.
  26. Lin W, Wang Y, Yang Y, Shen Y. AI-assisted nanomedicine design and optimization. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2023; 198:114891.
  27. Janiaud P, Serghiou S, Ioannidis JPA. New clinical trial designs incorporating AI. BMJ. 2021;372: n206.
  28. Viceconti M, Henney A, Morley-Fletcher E. In silico clinical trials: concepts and early applications. J Transl Med. 2016; 14:328.
  29. Corral-Acero J, Margara F, Marciniak M, Rodero C, Loncaric F, Feng Y, et al The digital twin to enable precision cardiology. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020;17(9):571–589.
  30. Bruinenberg M, van Baal P, Hoes A. Digital twins in healthcare. NPJ Digit Med. 2022; 5:77.
  31. Kleinstreuer C, Zhang Z. Airflow and particle transport in the human respiratory system. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 2010; 42:301–334.
  32. Longest PW, Hindle M. Aerosol deposition in the respiratory tract. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2011;24(2):79–99.
  33. Darquenne C. Aerosol deposition in health and disease. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2012;25(3):140–147.
  34. Islam N, Gladki E. Dry powder inhalers and pulmonary drug delivery. Int J Nanomedicine. 2008;3(2):201–207.
  35. Labiris NR, Dolovich MB. Pulmonary drug delivery. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;56(6):588–599.
  36. He H, Liu L, Morin EE, Liu M, Schwendeman A. Survey of clinical translation of cancer nanomedicines. J Control Release. 2019;311-312:288–300.
  37. Agrawal U, Sharma R, Gupta M, Vyas SP. Is nanotechnology a boon for oral and pulmonary drug delivery? Drug Discov Today. 2014;19(10):1530–1536.
  38. Ventola CL. Big data and artificial intelligence in healthcare. P T. 2014;39(7):512–515.

Reference

  1. Shaw AT, Bauer TM, de Marinis F, Felip E, Goto Y, Liu G, et al First-line lorlatinib or crizotinib in advanced ALK-positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(21):2018–2029.
  2. Solomon BJ, Besse B, Bauer TM, Felip E, Soo RA, Camidge DR, et al Lorlatinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: results from a global phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(12):1654–1667.
  3. Gainor JF, Dardaei L, Yoda S, Friboulet L, Leshchiner I, Katayama R, et al Molecular mechanisms of resistance to first- and second-generation ALK inhibitors in ALK-rearranged lung cancer. Cancer Discov. 2016;6(10):1118–1133.
  4. Camidge DR, Kim HR, Ahn MJ, Yang JC, Han JY, Lee JS, et al Brigatinib versus crizotinib in ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(21):2027–2039.
  5. Peters S, Camidge DR, Shaw AT, Gadgeel S, Ahn JS, Kim DW, et al Alectinib versus crizotinib in untreated ALK-positive NSCLC. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(9):829–838.
  6. Patton JS, Byron PR. Inhaling medicines: delivering drugs to the body through the lungs. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007;6(1):67–74.
  7. Sung JC, Pulliam BL, Edwards DA. Nanoparticles for drug delivery to the lungs. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2007;20(3):241–260.
  8. Carvalho TC, Peters JI, Williams RO. Influence of particle size on regional lung deposition. J Control Release. 2011;150(1):1–14.
  9. Mansour HM, Rhee YS, Wu X. Nanomedicine in pulmonary delivery. Int J Nanomedicine. 2009; 4:299–319.
  10. Paranjpe M, Müller-Goymann CC. Nanoparticle-mediated pulmonary drug delivery. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;15(4):5852–5873.
  11. Dames P, Gleich B, Flemmer A, Hajek K, Seidl N, Wiekhorst F, et al Targeted delivery of magnetic aerosol droplets to the lung. Nat Nanotechnol. 2007;2(8):495–499.
  12. Ehrhardt C. From nano to smart nanocarriers: pulmonary drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2011;8(6):747–762.
  13. Mehta P, Bothiraja C. Recent advances in inhalable nanocarrier-based systems. Drug Discov Today. 2020;25(11):1988–2001.
  14. Meenach SA, Vogt FG, Anderson KW, Hilt JZ, McGarry RC. Design of inhalable nanoparticle systems for lung cancer therapy. Pharm Res. 2013;30(2):631–648.
  15. Tzeng SY, Green JJ. Therapeutic nanomedicine for brain and lung cancers. Ther Deliv. 2013;4(6):687–704.
  16. Wang AZ, Langer R, Farokhzad OC. Nanoparticle delivery of cancer drugs. Annu Rev Med. 2012; 63:185–198.
  17. Shi J, Kantoff PW, Wooster R, Farokhzad OC. Cancer nanomedicine: progress, challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17(1):20–37.
  18. Bobo D, Robinson KJ, Islam J, Thurecht KJ, Corrie SR, et al Nanoparticle-based medicines: a review of FDA-approved materials. Pharm Res. 2016;33(10):2373–2387.
  19. Mitchell MJ, Billingsley MM, Haley RM, Wechsler ME, Peppas NA, Langer R. Engineering precision nanoparticles. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021;20(2):101–124.
  20. Etheridge ML, Campbell SA, Erdman AG, Haynes CL, Wolf SM, McCullough J. The big picture on nanomedicine. ACS Nano. 2013;7(6):552–556.
  21. Topol EJ. High-performance medicine: the convergence of AI and human intelligence. Nat Med. 2019;25(1):44–56.
  22. Vamathevan J, Clark D, Czodrowski P, Dunham I, Ferran E, Lee G, et al Applications of machine learning in drug discovery and development. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18(6):463–477.
  23. Paul D, Sanap G, Shenoy S, Kalyane D, Kalia K, Tekade RK. Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development. Drug Discov Today. 2021;26(1):80–93.
  24. Ekins S, Puhl AC, Zorn KM, Lane TR, Russo DP, Klein JJ, et al Exploiting machine learning for end-to-end drug discovery and development. Nat Mater. 2019;18(5):435–441.
  25. Chan HP, Samala RK, Hadjiiski LM. Deep learning in medical image analysis. Med Phys. 2020;47(5): e1–e36.
  26. Lin W, Wang Y, Yang Y, Shen Y. AI-assisted nanomedicine design and optimization. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2023; 198:114891.
  27. Janiaud P, Serghiou S, Ioannidis JPA. New clinical trial designs incorporating AI. BMJ. 2021;372: n206.
  28. Viceconti M, Henney A, Morley-Fletcher E. In silico clinical trials: concepts and early applications. J Transl Med. 2016; 14:328.
  29. Corral-Acero J, Margara F, Marciniak M, Rodero C, Loncaric F, Feng Y, et al The digital twin to enable precision cardiology. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2020;17(9):571–589.
  30. Bruinenberg M, van Baal P, Hoes A. Digital twins in healthcare. NPJ Digit Med. 2022; 5:77.
  31. Kleinstreuer C, Zhang Z. Airflow and particle transport in the human respiratory system. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 2010; 42:301–334.
  32. Longest PW, Hindle M. Aerosol deposition in the respiratory tract. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2011;24(2):79–99.
  33. Darquenne C. Aerosol deposition in health and disease. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2012;25(3):140–147.
  34. Islam N, Gladki E. Dry powder inhalers and pulmonary drug delivery. Int J Nanomedicine. 2008;3(2):201–207.
  35. Labiris NR, Dolovich MB. Pulmonary drug delivery. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;56(6):588–599.
  36. He H, Liu L, Morin EE, Liu M, Schwendeman A. Survey of clinical translation of cancer nanomedicines. J Control Release. 2019;311-312:288–300.
  37. Agrawal U, Sharma R, Gupta M, Vyas SP. Is nanotechnology a boon for oral and pulmonary drug delivery? Drug Discov Today. 2014;19(10):1530–1536.
  38. Ventola CL. Big data and artificial intelligence in healthcare. P T. 2014;39(7):512–515.

Photo
Sneh Malviya
Corresponding author

Department of Pharmacy, Indore Mahavidyalaya Jambudi Hapsi, Opposite Pitra Parvat, Indore 453112

Sneh Malviya*, Artificial Intelligence-Driven Design and Optimization of Aerosolized Lorlatinib Nanocarriers for Precision Lung Cancer Therapy: Current Advances, Challenges, and Future Perspectives, Int. J. Med. Pharm. Sci., 2026, 2 (7), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21096931

More related articles
Multimodal Deep Learning for Integrating Radiology...
Arvind Menon, Shatrughna Nagrik, Raghav Sharma, Neha Kulkarni...
Structure–Property Relationships and Mechanistic...
Mohammed Naseem Qureshi, Shaikh Mohd Mujtaba, Shaikh Maviya Azhar...
A Review on the Role of Artificial Intelligence in...
Vaibhav Shikare, Urmila Ingole, Pavan Idhole, Ashish Gawai...
Related Articles
A Comprehensive Review on Artificial Intelligence for Accelerating Drug Discover...
Shivshankar Nagrik, Vaishnavi Kamble, Sakshi Tayde, Sakshi Bendarkar, Poonam Tale, Mohini Kale, Jank...
AI-Driven Drug Delivery System Design and Optimization...
Narendra Sharma, Vishal Garg, Pushpendra Kumar Saini...
Multimodal Deep Learning for Integrating Radiology and Genomic Data in Precision...
Arvind Menon, Shatrughna Nagrik, Raghav Sharma, Neha Kulkarni...
More related articles
Multimodal Deep Learning for Integrating Radiology and Genomic Data in Precision...
Arvind Menon, Shatrughna Nagrik, Raghav Sharma, Neha Kulkarni...
Structure–Property Relationships and Mechanistic Evaluation of pH-Responsive P...
Mohammed Naseem Qureshi, Shaikh Mohd Mujtaba, Shaikh Maviya Azhar Patel, Pathan Musharraf Khan, Muza...
A Review on the Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Pharma Industry...
Vaibhav Shikare, Urmila Ingole, Pavan Idhole, Ashish Gawai...
Multimodal Deep Learning for Integrating Radiology and Genomic Data in Precision...
Arvind Menon, Shatrughna Nagrik, Raghav Sharma, Neha Kulkarni...
Structure–Property Relationships and Mechanistic Evaluation of pH-Responsive P...
Mohammed Naseem Qureshi, Shaikh Mohd Mujtaba, Shaikh Maviya Azhar Patel, Pathan Musharraf Khan, Muza...
A Review on the Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Pharma Industry...
Vaibhav Shikare, Urmila Ingole, Pavan Idhole, Ashish Gawai...