View Article

Abstract

Skin cancer is one of the most prevalent malignancies worldwide, with melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers posing significant health challenges. Conventional chemotherapy for skin cancer is often associated with systemic toxicity, poor drug penetration, rapid degradation, and limited therapeutic efficacy. Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) have emerged as promising nanocarriers due to their biocompatibility, enhanced drug loading, controlled release, and improved skin penetration. The present study aimed to design and develop a nano lipid carrier-based drug delivery system for targeted treatment of skin cancer. Curcumin was selected as a model anticancer drug due to its potent antioxidant and anticancer properties. NLCs were prepared using hot homogenization followed by ultrasonication and characterized for particle size, zeta potential, drug entrapment efficiency, morphology, and in vitro drug release. Cytotoxicity studies were performed against A375 human melanoma cell lines using MTT assay. In vivo antitumor activity and histopathological studies were conducted in experimentally induced skin cancer models. The optimized NLC formulation exhibited nanosized particles, sustained drug release, enhanced cytotoxicity, improved skin permeation, and significant tumor suppression compared with conventional formulations. These findings suggest that NLC-based drug delivery systems can serve as an effective therapeutic strategy for skin cancer management.

Keywords

Skin cancer, Nanostructured lipid carriers, Curcumin, Nanotechnology, Drug delivery, Anticancer activity.

Introduction

× Popup Image

Skin cancer is a major global public health concern and includes melanoma, basal cell carcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma [1]. Ultraviolet radiation exposure, oxidative stress, environmental pollutants, and genetic predisposition contribute significantly to skin carcinogenesis [2]. Conventional therapies such as chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy are associated with adverse effects including systemic toxicity, poor selectivity, and recurrence [3]. Therefore, the development of novel targeted drug delivery systems is essential for improving therapeutic outcomes. Natural bioactive compounds have gained attention for cancer treatment because of their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antiproliferative properties [4]. Curcumin, a polyphenolic compound obtained from Curcuma longa, has demonstrated significant anticancer activity through modulation of apoptosis, oxidative stress, angiogenesis, and inflammatory pathways [5]. However, poor aqueous solubility, low bioavailability, rapid metabolism, and limited skin penetration restrict its clinical application [6]. Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) are advanced lipid-based nanosystems composed of solid and liquid lipids stabilized by surfactants [7]. NLCs improve drug stability, increase skin penetration, enhance drug loading, and provide controlled release properties [8]. Due to their nanoscale size and lipidic composition, NLCs facilitate targeted delivery to skin tissues while minimizing systemic exposure [9].

The present study focused on the formulation, characterization, and evaluation of curcumin-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers for effective treatment of skin cancer.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1 MATERIALS

Curcumin was procured from a certified pharmaceutical supplier. Glyceryl monostearate and oleic acid were used as solid and liquid lipids respectively. Tween 80 and soy lecithin were used as surfactants. All chemicals and reagents used were of analytical grade.

2.2 Preparation of Nanostructured Lipid Carriers

Curcumin-loaded NLCs were prepared by hot homogenization followed by ultrasonication [10]. Solid lipid and liquid lipid were melted at 75°C. Curcumin was dissolved in the molten lipid phase. The aqueous surfactant phase was heated to the same temperature and added to the lipid phase under high-speed homogenization. The pre-emulsion obtained was ultrasonicated for 10 min and cooled to room temperature to form NLCs.

Composition of Optimized NLC Formulation

 

Component

Quantity

Curcumin

100 mg

Glyceryl monostearate

500 mg

Oleic acid

200 mg

Tween 80

1.5%

Soy lecithin

1%

Distilled water

q.s. 100 mL

2.3 Characterization of NLCs

2.3.1 Particle Size and Polydispersity Index

Particle size and polydispersity index were determined using dynamic light scattering.

2.3.2 Zeta Potential

Zeta potential was measured to determine stability of the formulation.

2.3.3 Entrapment Efficiency

Entrapment efficiency was determined using centrifugation method.

Entrapment Efficiency (%)=Total drug−Free drugTotal drug×100Entrapment\ Efficiency\ (\%) = \frac{Total\ drug - Free\ drug}{Total\ drug} \times 100Entrapment Efficiency (%)=Total drugTotal drug−Free drug​×100Error! Filename not specified.

2.3.4 Morphological Analysis

Surface morphology of NLCs was examined using transmission electron microscopy (TEM).

2.3.5 Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

DSC analysis was performed to study thermal behavior and crystallinity of the formulation.

2.4 In Vitro Drug Release Study

Drug release study was carried out using dialysis membrane diffusion method in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) at 37 ± 0.5°C. Samples were withdrawn at predetermined intervals and analyzed spectrophotometrically at 425 nm.

2.5 Skin Permeation Study

Ex vivo skin permeation studies were performed using Franz diffusion cells with excised rat skin.

2.6 Cell Culture and Cytotoxicity Assay

A375 human melanoma cell lines were cultured in DMEM supplemented with fetal bovine serum. Cytotoxicity of formulations was evaluated using MTT assay [11].

Percentage Cell Viability

Cell Viability (%)=Absorbance of treated cellsAbsorbance of control cells×100Cell\ Viability\ (\%) = \frac{Absorbance\ of\ treated\ cells}{Absorbance\ of\ control\ cells} \times 100Cell Viability (%)=Absorbance of control cellsAbsorbance of treated cells​×100Error! Filename not specified.

2.7 In Vivo Anticancer Study

Experimental skin cancer was induced in Swiss albino mice using 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA) [12]. Animals were divided into four groups:

  1. Normal control
  2. Cancer control
  3. Conventional curcumin gel-treated group
  4. Curcumin-loaded NLC-treated group

Treatment was continued for six weeks.

2.8 Histopathological Examination

Skin tissues were fixed in formalin, embedded in paraffin, sectioned, stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and examined microscopically.

2.9 Statistical Analysis

Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance was analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. RESULTS

3.1 Characterization of Nanostructured Lipid Carriers

The prepared NLCs showed good physicochemical characteristics.

Parameter

Result

Particle size

142.6 ± 5.4 nm

Polydispersity index

0.218 ± 0.01

Zeta potential

−31.2 ± 1.6 mV

Entrapment efficiency

89.5 ± 2.8%

The nanosized particles and narrow size distribution indicated formulation uniformity and stability.

3.2 Morphological Analysis

TEM analysis revealed spherical nanoparticles with smooth surfaces and uniform distribution.

3.3 Differential Scanning Calorimetry

DSC thermograms demonstrated reduced crystallinity of the lipid matrix, confirming successful incorporation of curcumin into the NLC system.

3.4 In Vitro Drug Release

The optimized NLC formulation exhibited sustained drug release over 24 h.

Time (h)

Cumulative Drug Release (%)

1

18.4 ± 1.2

2

31.6 ± 1.5

4

47.3 ± 1.8

8

65.8 ± 2.1

12

78.9 ± 2.4

24

92.5 ± 2.7

The sustained release profile indicated prolonged therapeutic action.

3.5 Ex Vivo Skin Permeation Study

The NLC formulation demonstrated significantly higher skin permeation compared with conventional curcumin gel.

Formulation

Drug Permeation (%)

Conventional gel

46.7 ± 2.3

NLC formulation

83.5 ± 3.1

Enhanced permeation was attributed to nanoscale size and lipid composition.

3.6 Cytotoxicity Study

The curcumin-loaded NLCs exhibited enhanced cytotoxicity against A375 melanoma cells.

Formulation

IC50 Value (µg/mL)

Free curcumin

28.6 ± 1.4

Curcumin NLC

11.8 ± 0.9

Lower IC50 values indicated stronger anticancer activity of the NLC formulation.

3.7 In Vivo Anticancer Activity

The NLC-treated group demonstrated significant reduction in tumor volume and lesion severity.

Group

Tumor Volume (mm3)

Cancer control

432.5 ± 18.7

Conventional gel

248.4 ± 12.6

NLC formulation

116.7 ± 8.3

The nanoformulation exhibited superior antitumor efficacy compared with conventional treatment.

3.8 Histopathological Findings

Histopathological examination of cancer control tissues showed hyperkeratosis, abnormal cell proliferation, and inflammatory infiltration. Treatment with curcumin-loaded NLCs restored normal skin architecture and reduced tumor-associated abnormalities.

DISCUSSION

The present study successfully developed curcumin-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers with desirable physicochemical and pharmacological characteristics. Particle size below 200 nm facilitates enhanced penetration into deeper skin layers and improves cellular uptake [13]. The negative zeta potential confirmed good colloidal stability. High entrapment efficiency observed in the present study may be due to the lipid matrix structure and compatibility of curcumin with lipids. Sustained drug release from NLCs prolongs therapeutic action and minimizes frequent dosing [14]. Enhanced skin permeation may result from the occlusive effect and interaction of lipid nanoparticles with stratum corneum lipids. Improved cytotoxicity against melanoma cells demonstrated effective intracellular delivery of curcumin. The in vivo antitumor activity confirmed significant reduction in tumor progression. Histopathological findings further supported the protective effects of NLCs against skin carcinogenesis. Improved therapeutic efficacy of the nanoformulation compared with conventional formulations may be attributed to enhanced bioavailability and targeted delivery.

CONCLUSION

The present investigation demonstrated that nanostructured lipid carriers are promising carriers for effective delivery of anticancer agents in skin cancer therapy. Curcumin-loaded NLCs showed excellent physicochemical stability, sustained release, enhanced skin permeation, significant cytotoxicity, and improved antitumor activity. The developed nano lipid carrier system may provide a safer and more efficient therapeutic alternative for skin cancer treatment. Further clinical studies are necessary to evaluate long-term safety and therapeutic efficacy in humans.

REFERENCES

  1. Leiter U, Garbe C. Epidemiology of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014; 810:120–140.
  2. Narayanan DL, Saladi RN, Fox JL. Ultraviolet radiation and skin cancer. Int J Dermatol. 2010;49(9):978–986.
  3. Guy GP Jr, Thomas CC, Thompson T, Watson M, Massetti GM, Richardson LC. Vital signs: Melanoma incidence and mortality trends. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(21):591–596.
  4. Cragg GM, Newman DJ. Natural products: A continuing source of novel drug leads. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1830(6):3670–3695.
  5. Aggarwal BB, Kumar A, Bharti AC. Anticancer potential of curcumin. Anticancer Res. 2003;23(1A):363–398.
  6. Anand P, Kunnumakkara AB, Newman RA, Aggarwal BB. Bioavailability of curcumin. Mol Pharm. 2007;4(6):807–818.
  7. Müller RH, Radtke M, Wissing SA. Nanostructured lipid matrices for improved microencapsulation of drugs. Int J Pharm. 2002;242(1-2):121–128.
  8. Pardeike J, Hommoss A, Müller RH. Lipid nanoparticles for drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 2009;366(1-2):170–184.
  9. Souto EB, Müller RH. Cosmetic features and applications of lipid nanoparticles. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2008;30(3):157–165.
  10. Mehnert W, Mäder K. Solid lipid nanoparticles: Production, characterization and applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2001;47(2-3):165–196.
  11. Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival. J Immunol Methods. 1983;65(1-2):55–63.
  12. Klaunig JE, Kamendulis LM. The role of oxidative stress in carcinogenesis. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2004; 44:239–267.
  13. Tapeinos C, Battaglini M, Ciofani G. Advances in the design of solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers. J Control Release. 2017; 264:306–332.
  14. Beloqui A, Solinís MA, Rodríguez-Gascón A, Almeida AJ, Préat V. Nanostructured lipid carriers: Promising drug delivery systems for future clinics. Nanomedicine. 2016;12(1):143–161.
  15. Patel D, Dasgupta S, Dey S, et al. Nanostructured lipid carriers for topical drug delivery. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2020;72(6):741–755.
  16. Mukherjee S, Ray S, Thakur RS. Solid lipid nanoparticles: A modern formulation approach in drug delivery system. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2009;71(4):349–358.
  17. Gupta A, Eral HB, Hatton TA, Doyle PS. Nanoemulsions: Formation, properties and applications. Soft Matter. 2016;12(11):2826–2841.
  18. Kakkar V, Kaur IP, Kaur AP, et al. Topical delivery of curcumin by lipid nanoparticles. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2011;83(1):114–124.
  19. Wissing SA, Kayser O, Müller RH. Solid lipid nanoparticles for parenteral drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004;56(9):1257–1272.
  20. Das S, Chaudhury A. Recent advances in lipid nanoparticle formulations. J Pharm Sci Technol. 2011;65(4):311–333.

Reference

  1. Leiter U, Garbe C. Epidemiology of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2014; 810:120–140.
  2. Narayanan DL, Saladi RN, Fox JL. Ultraviolet radiation and skin cancer. Int J Dermatol. 2010;49(9):978–986.
  3. Guy GP Jr, Thomas CC, Thompson T, Watson M, Massetti GM, Richardson LC. Vital signs: Melanoma incidence and mortality trends. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2015;64(21):591–596.
  4. Cragg GM, Newman DJ. Natural products: A continuing source of novel drug leads. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1830(6):3670–3695.
  5. Aggarwal BB, Kumar A, Bharti AC. Anticancer potential of curcumin. Anticancer Res. 2003;23(1A):363–398.
  6. Anand P, Kunnumakkara AB, Newman RA, Aggarwal BB. Bioavailability of curcumin. Mol Pharm. 2007;4(6):807–818.
  7. Müller RH, Radtke M, Wissing SA. Nanostructured lipid matrices for improved microencapsulation of drugs. Int J Pharm. 2002;242(1-2):121–128.
  8. Pardeike J, Hommoss A, Müller RH. Lipid nanoparticles for drug delivery. Int J Pharm. 2009;366(1-2):170–184.
  9. Souto EB, Müller RH. Cosmetic features and applications of lipid nanoparticles. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2008;30(3):157–165.
  10. Mehnert W, Mäder K. Solid lipid nanoparticles: Production, characterization and applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2001;47(2-3):165–196.
  11. Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival. J Immunol Methods. 1983;65(1-2):55–63.
  12. Klaunig JE, Kamendulis LM. The role of oxidative stress in carcinogenesis. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2004; 44:239–267.
  13. Tapeinos C, Battaglini M, Ciofani G. Advances in the design of solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers. J Control Release. 2017; 264:306–332.
  14. Beloqui A, Solinís MA, Rodríguez-Gascón A, Almeida AJ, Préat V. Nanostructured lipid carriers: Promising drug delivery systems for future clinics. Nanomedicine. 2016;12(1):143–161.
  15. Patel D, Dasgupta S, Dey S, et al. Nanostructured lipid carriers for topical drug delivery. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2020;72(6):741–755.
  16. Mukherjee S, Ray S, Thakur RS. Solid lipid nanoparticles: A modern formulation approach in drug delivery system. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2009;71(4):349–358.
  17. Gupta A, Eral HB, Hatton TA, Doyle PS. Nanoemulsions: Formation, properties and applications. Soft Matter. 2016;12(11):2826–2841.
  18. Kakkar V, Kaur IP, Kaur AP, et al. Topical delivery of curcumin by lipid nanoparticles. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2011;83(1):114–124.
  19. Wissing SA, Kayser O, Müller RH. Solid lipid nanoparticles for parenteral drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2004;56(9):1257–1272.
  20. Das S, Chaudhury A. Recent advances in lipid nanoparticle formulations. J Pharm Sci Technol. 2011;65(4):311–333.

Photo
Momin Llsa M. A.
Corresponding author

Faculty of Pharmacy, Mansarovar Global University, Sehore (M.P.)

Photo
Dhaynendra Singh Baghel
Co-author

Faculty of Pharmacy, Mansarovar Global University, Sehore (M.P.)

Momin Llsa M. A.*, Dhaynendra Singh Baghel, Design and Development of Nano Lipid Carrier Based Drug Delivery for Treatment of Skin Cancer, Int. J. Med. Pharm. Sci., 2026, 2 (5), 587-592. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20350039

More related articles
Advances in Proniosome-Based Topical Drug Delivery...
Jeevan Kore, Shweta Mohite, Shraddha Kothale, Mahesh Kore...
Formulation and In Vitro Evaluation of a Self-Emul...
Abhinandan Satapathy, Sradhanjali Patra, P. N. Tapaswini Behera...
Nephroprotective Activity of Manilkara Zapota Nano...
Sahana Shailesh Vajramatti, Sanjay Havaragi, Salma Bhanu, Marigou...
mRNA Technology in Pharmacy from Vaccine to Therapeutic Applications...
Anjali Mane, P. M. Mohite, Harshali Tambvekar, D. R. Jadge...
Polymeric Nanoparticles for Oral, Parenteral and Transdermal Drug Delivery: Desi...
Manali Bode, Sanket Bhoyar, Sabiya Sheikh, Rajlaxmi Deolekar, Priyanka Sakhare, Prachi Rohit Moon, H...
AI-Driven Drug Delivery System Design and Optimization...
Narendra Sharma, Vishal Garg, Pushpendra Kumar Saini...
Related Articles
SNEDDS – A Novel Technology Approach for Nano Emulsion Based Drug Delivery of ...
Bhagyesh Janugade, Samruddhi Desai, Pratiksha Desai, Harsha Bhosale, Gayatri Atpadkar...
Green Synthesis of Iron and Zinc Nanoparticles from Centella Asiatica, Lawsonia ...
Geetha K., Saron Merline J., Nishanth P., Nambeeswari J., Helen Gracelin Joy M., Ganga A....
Herbal Drug as an Emerging Tool for Novel Drug Delivery System...
Binny Mehta, Vraj Sorathiya, Pratham Sonkusare, Harsh Parmar...
A Comprehensive Review on Artificial Intelligence for Accelerating Drug Discover...
Shivshankar Nagrik, Vaishnavi Kamble, Sakshi Tayde, Sakshi Bendarkar, Poonam Tale, Mohini Kale, Jank...
Advances in Proniosome-Based Topical Drug Delivery: Formulation and Therapeutic ...
Jeevan Kore, Shweta Mohite, Shraddha Kothale, Mahesh Kore...
More related articles
Advances in Proniosome-Based Topical Drug Delivery: Formulation and Therapeutic ...
Jeevan Kore, Shweta Mohite, Shraddha Kothale, Mahesh Kore...
Formulation and In Vitro Evaluation of a Self-Emulsifying Drug Delivery System o...
Abhinandan Satapathy, Sradhanjali Patra, P. N. Tapaswini Behera...
Nephroprotective Activity of Manilkara Zapota Nano-Suspension Formulation on Gen...
Sahana Shailesh Vajramatti, Sanjay Havaragi, Salma Bhanu, Marigouda Patil, Mallappa Shalavadi, Linga...
Advances in Proniosome-Based Topical Drug Delivery: Formulation and Therapeutic ...
Jeevan Kore, Shweta Mohite, Shraddha Kothale, Mahesh Kore...
Formulation and In Vitro Evaluation of a Self-Emulsifying Drug Delivery System o...
Abhinandan Satapathy, Sradhanjali Patra, P. N. Tapaswini Behera...
Nephroprotective Activity of Manilkara Zapota Nano-Suspension Formulation on Gen...
Sahana Shailesh Vajramatti, Sanjay Havaragi, Salma Bhanu, Marigouda Patil, Mallappa Shalavadi, Linga...