View Article

  • Phytochemical Characterization of Hexane Extract of Hygrophila Auriculata Leaves Through GC–MS Analysis

  • 1Assistant Professor cum Research Scholar, Department of Pharmacology, Adhiparasakthi College of Pharmacy, Melmaruvathur.
    2Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Adhiparasakthi College of Pharmacy, Melmaruvathur-603319.
    3Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Adhiparasakthi College of Pharmacy, Melmaruvathur.
    4Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Karpaga Vinayaga Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chengalpat.
    5Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Surya School of Pharmacy, Vilupuram
     

Abstract

Hygrophila auriculata (Schumach.) Heine is a medicinal herb widely employed in traditional systems of medicine owing to its diverse pharmacological properties. The present study aimed to characterize the phytochemical composition of the hexane leaf extract of H. auriculata using Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS). GC–MS analysis revealed the presence of more than 60 phytochemical constituents, representing a broad spectrum of bioactive compounds, including phenolics, monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, diterpenes, triterpenoids, phytosterols, and quinone derivatives. The major constituents identified included carvacrol (Phenol, 2-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl)), (Z,Z)-α-farnesene, trans-α-bergamotene, acetyleugenol, copaene, longifolene, caryophyllene, α-humulene, neophytadiene, β-sitosterol, β-amyrone, 9,19-cycloergost-24(28)-en-3-ol, lup-20(29)-en-3-one, lupeol, stigmasta-3,5-diene, α-tocopherolquinone, and campesterol. These compounds have been reported to exhibit a wide range of biological activities, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, anticancer, hepatoprotective, immunomodulatory, and cardioprotective effects. The abundance of terpenoids and phytosterols in the hexane extract highlights the effectiveness of non-polar solvent extraction in recovering lipophilic bioactive metabolites. In particular, the presence of pharmacologically important compounds such as lupeol, β-sitosterol, campesterol, caryophyllene, α-humulene, and carvacrol suggests that the extract possesses considerable therapeutic potential. The GC–MS fingerprint generated in this study provides a comprehensive chemical profile of H. auriculata leaves and offers scientific evidence supporting their traditional medicinal use. The identification of over 60 phytochemicals demonstrates the chemical richness of the hexane extract and underscores its potential as a valuable source of natural bioactive compounds for pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, and functional food applications. Further studies focusing on the isolation, purification, quantitative estimation, and biological evaluation of the major constituents are warranted to validate their pharmacological efficacy and explore their therapeutic applications.

Keywords

GC-MS analysis, Hygrophila auriculata, Phytochemicals, Hygrophila spinosa, Hexane extract

Introduction

× Popup Image

For thousands of years, medicinal plants have played a central role in human healthcare, providing a major source of therapeutic molecules and constituting the basis of traditional medical systems across the world1. Ancient cultures including Egyptian, Greek, and Chinese civilizations, as well as Indigenous groups in Africa, the Americas, and Asia, have long exploited the healing potential of plants to manage various diseases2. Owing to their diverse bioactive constituents, these plants have been employed against common disorders, infectious diseases, and severe conditions, establishing themselves as a vital component of healthcare worldwide. Their relevance extends beyond history, as medicinal plants continue to be a dynamic and evolving area influencing contemporary traditional and modern medicine.3 While medicinal plants have been used in healthcare for centuries, scientific scrutiny of their properties is a relatively recent development. The progress of modern pharmacology has highlighted the importance of validating traditional knowledge and investigating the intricate phytochemical profiles of plants with long histories of medicinal use.4 Despite its promising therapeutic profile, Hygrophila auriculata remains an underexploited medicinal species requiring further systematic investigation. A member of the Acanthaceae family, it is widely distributed in South and Southeast Asia including Nepal, India, Myanmar, Malaysia, and Sri Lanka.5 The plant is a rich source of phytochemicals such as glycosides, polyphenols, phytosterols, fatty acids, alkaloids, proanthocyanidins, enzymes, amino acids, and terpenoids. It demonstrates a broad spectrum of pharmacological effects including cardioprotective, anti-stress, diuretic, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, hepatoprotective, nephroprotective, and neuroprotective activities. In addition, its traditional use in Bengali culinary preparations underscores its potential for translation into functional foods and nutraceuticals that integrate traditional wisdom with modern science.6

Vernacular names:7

Marathi  : Kolshinda Talimkhana

Sanskrit : Kokilaksa

Bengali  : Kuliyakhara

Gujrati   : Ekharo

Hindi     : Talmakhana

Kannada: Kolavali

Marathi  : Talikhana Kalsunda

Tamil     : Golmidi, Neermulli

Urdu       : Talmakhana.

Taxonomy8

  • Kingdom      : Plantae
  • Class             : Magnoliopsida
  • Subkingdom  : Viridiplantae
  • Superorder    : Asteranae
  • Infrakingdom : Streptophyta
  • Order            : Lamiales
  • Superdivision: Embryophyta
  • Family          : Acanthaceae
  • Division        : Tracheophyta
  • Genus            : Hygrophila R. Br.
  • Subdivision     : Spermatophyta
  • Species          : Hygrophila auriculata

Traditionally, various parts of the plant including roots, leaves, and seeds have been utilized in Indian medicine as diuretic agents and for managing conditions such as jaundice, dropsy, rheumatism, anasarca, and urinogenital tract diseases. Ayurvedic literature describes kokilaksha as an effective remedy for arthritis. The plant is also credited with improving strength and appetite and with therapeutic efficacy against edema, ascites, excessive thirst, bladder calculi, ophthalmic disorders, and dysentery. Its root decoction exhibits diuretic properties, and a formulation containing its leaves and roots with flowers of Stuea frondosa is employed for leucorrhoea. Additionally, it is traditionally used to address impotence, spermatorrhea, and seminal weakness.8,9 GC–MS analysis of the hexane extract of the leaves of Hygrophila auriculata was performed to identify the phytochemical constituents present in the extract.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Collection of Plant material

Hygrophila auriculata leaves were collected in the month of April 2025 from Tirunelveli District, Tamil Nadu. The whole plant was authenticated by Dr. M. Syed Ali Fathima, Assistant Professor and Head, Sadakathullah Appa Arts and Science College, Tirunelveli. (Specimen Number: SAC/BOT/2025).

Figure 1: Leaves of Hygrophila auriculata

Extraction of Plant material

The leaves of Hygrophila auriculata was dried and powdered. The dried leaf powder extracted with n-hexane using Soxhlet apparatus. Finally, it was concentrated by vacuum evaporator.

GC-MS Analysis

The phytochemical composition of the hexane leaf extract of Hygrophila auriculata was analysed using Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS) with an Agilent 7890B Gas Chromatograph coupled to an Agilent 5977A Mass Selective Detector (MSD). Separation was achieved using a fused-silica capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm internal diameter × 0.25 μm film thickness). High-purity helium (99.999%) served as the carrier gas at a constant flow rate of 1.0 mL min⁻¹. A 1 μL aliquot of the sample was injected using a split ratio of 10:1. All samples were analysed in triplicate to ensure the reproducibility and reliability of the analytical results. Quality assurance procedures included instrument calibration before analysis, solvent-blank injections to detect potential contamination, and periodic analysis of a standard reference mixture to verify retention-time consistency, mass accuracy, and overall instrument performance throughout the analytical sequence. The injector and transfer-line temperatures were maintained at 250 °C and 280 °C, respectively. The oven temperature programme was initiated at 60 °C and held for 2 min, followed by a temperature ramp of 10 °C min⁻¹ to 280 °C, where it was maintained for an additional 10 min. The mass spectrometer was operated in electron ionization (EI) mode at an ionization energy of 70 eV, with mass spectra acquired over an m/z range of 40–600. Compound identification was performed by comparing the acquired mass spectra with those available in the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and Wiley mass spectral libraries. The relative abundance of each identified compound was determined from its percentage peak area in the total ion chromatogram (TIC), providing a semi-quantitative estimate of the phytochemical composition of the extract10.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

Figure 2: Chromatogram of Hexane extract of Hygrophila auriculata

Table 1: Peak report of Hygrophila auriculata

Peak

Retention time

Area

Peak area %

Height

Name of the compound

1

3.792

136691

0.06

19415

p-Xylene

2

4.092

563275

0.23

191192

Silane, ethenyldiethylmethyl-

3

4.179

5940997

2.45

1942861

Ethyl 3-ethoxyacrylate

4

4.333

81060

0.03

17450

3-Heptanol, 2,4-dimethyl-

5

4.506

60617

0.03

20242

Butane, 1,1,3-trimethoxy

6

4.805

70347

0.03

24550

Silane, ethenyldiethylmethyl-

7

4.948

68939

0.03

23351

Isopropyl acetate

8

5.493

60135

0.02

18045

Decane

9

6.506

413136

0.17

129875

2-Propanol, 1-[1-methyl-2-(2-propenyloxy)eth

10

7.285

44244

0.02

14502

Tridecane

11

10.793

18234004

7.53

4760606

Phenol, 2-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl)-

12

11.719

47337

0.02

14778

(Z,Z)-.alpha.-Farnesene

13

11.880

1338171

0.55

287209

Phenol, 2-methoxy-4-(2-propenyl)-, acetate

14

12.169

70421

0.03

18385

Copaene

15

12.417

64356

0.03

14019

1H-3a,7-Methanoazulene, octahydro-1,4,9,9-t

16

12.687

197511

0.08

62509

Longifolene

17

12.897

462137

0.19

145776

Caryophyllene

18

13.438

54828

0.02

19274

Humulene

19

14.253

165101

0.07

49625

1H-Cycloprop[e]azulene, 1a,2,3,4,4a,5,6,7b-o

20

14.496

107472

0.04

25341

cis-muurola-3,5-diene

21

14.654

62072

0.03

17578

2(4H)-Benzofuranone, 5,6,7,7a-tetrahydro-4,4

22

15.431

131271

0.05

34064

1H-3a,7-Methanoazulene, octahydro-1,4,9,9-t

23

15.554

239713

0.1

52006

Diethyl Phthalate

24

18.249

52122

0.02

17891

Sulfurous acid, 2-ethylhexyl isohexyl ester

25

18.770

233033

0.1

72745

Neophytadiene

26

18.866

267965

0.11

77335

2-Pentadecanone, 6,10,14-trimethyl-

27

19.088

59460

0.02

19276

3,7,11,15-Tetramethyl-2-hexadecen-1-ol

28

19.315

111022

0.05

26006

3,7,11,15-Tetramethyl-2-hexadecen-1-ol

29

19.445

54760

0.02

18805

Cyclohexene, 3-methyl-6-(1-methylethylidene

30

19.877

132036

0.05

29847

Pentadecanoic acid, 14-methyl-, methyl ester

31

20.361

1283448

0.53

168300

n-Hexadecanoic acid

32

20.699

529307

0.22

100244

Hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester

33

21.889

588571

0.24

173464

9,12-Octadecadienoic acid, methyl ester

34

21.960

511661

0.21

158376

6-Octadecenoic acid, methyl ester, (Z)-

35

22.098

3036379

1.25

906891

3,7,11,15-Tetramethyl-2-hexadecen-1-ol

36

22.568

125716579

51.94

8444092

cis-9-Hexadecenal

37

24.085

172312

0.07

46682

Octacosane, 2-methyl-

38

24.183

54668

0.02

19621

(4,6,8,9-Tetramethyl-3-oxabicyclo[3.3.1]non-6

39

24.623

95454

0.04

30867

3-methyl-5-(2,6-dimethylheptyl)-1,5-Pent-2-en

40

25.008

146897

0.06

27449

Octane, 1-propoxy-

41

25.101

187478

0.08

51287

2-Bromotetradecane

42

25.435

132640

0.05

38264

Oleoyl chloride

43

26.023

12285209

5.08

1540446

beta-Sitosterol

44

26.256

6338442

2.62

784870

beta-Amyrone

45

26.652

6614348

2.73

1936958

Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate

46

27.046

288175

0.12

65776

Heneicosane

47

27.133

420669

0.17

73809

Olean-12-en-3-ol, acetate, (3.beta.)-

48

27.249

627974

0.26

107429

.beta.-Amyrone

49

27.432

318374

0.13

41747

9,19-Cycloergost-24(28)-en-3-ol, 4,14-dimeth

50

28.014

1883358

0.78

288783

Pentatriacontane

51

28.171

2263940

0.94

238946

Lup-20(29)-en-3-one

52

28.725

111442

0.05

20584

2-Isopropyl-5-methylcyclohexyl methylphosph

53

29.005

3297194

1.36

324515

Lup-20(29)-en-3-ol, acetate, (3.beta.)-

54

29.150

335057

0.14

97106

Eicosane

55

29.598

5745547

2.37

1469296

Squalene

56

29.945

279905

0.12

58886

Sulfurous acid, 2-propyl tridecyl ester

57

30.418

673568

0.28

171924

Tetratetracontane

58

30.817

246117

0.1

55501

Tetratetracontane

59

31.173

20533449

8.48

1928206

Olean-12-en-3-ol, acetate, (3.beta.)-

60

31.647

408937

0.17

57800

Heptacosane, 1-chloro-

61

31.850

109909

0.05

22720

1H-Cyclopropa[3,4]benz[1,2-e]azulene-5,7b,9

62

32.008

154314

0.06

28950

Tetrapentacontane, 1,54-dibromo-

63

32.468

5706068

2.36

521786

Lup-20(29)-en-3-ol, acetate, (3.beta.)-

64

32.671

494642

0.2

92842

(1R,4aR,5S)-5-[(E)-5-Hydroxy-3-methylpent-

65

32.815

1116585

0.46

226690

Tetracontane

66

32.917

879989

0.36

138301

.beta.-Sitosterol acetate

67

33.207

2607122

1.08

341905

Cholesterol

68

33.500

2044484

0.84

148547

.alpha.-Tocopherolquinone

69

33.767

441610

0.18

59707

erythro-9,10-Dibromopentacosane

70

33.933

361972

0.15

49164

2.beta.,4.beta.,16.alpha.-Tribromoallopregn-16

71

34.101

697589

0.29

71311

Dotriacontane, 1-iodo-

72

34.703

2764291

1.14

438654

Campesterol

Table 2: Structure, molecular weight, molecular formula for some important compounds

Compound Name

Mol. Formula

Mol. weight

Structure

Phenol, 2-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl) or Carvacrol

C10H14O

150

 

 

(Z,Z) alpha Farnesene

C15H24

204

 

 

Trans- alpha-Bergamotene

C15H24

204

 

 

Phenol, 2-methoxy-4-(2-propenyl)-, acetate or Acetyleugenol

C12H14O3

206

 

 

Copaene or Tricyclo dec-3-ene

C15H24

204

 

 

Longifolene

C15H24

204

 

 

Caryophyllene or Bicyclo undec-4-ene

C15H24

204

 

 

Humulene or alpha Caryophyllene

C15H24

204

 

 

2(4H)-Benzofuranone, 5,6,7,7a-tetrahydro-4,4,7a-trimethyl

C11H16O2

180

 

 

Neophytadiene or 7,11,15-Trimethyl-3-methylenehexadec-1-ene

C20H38

278

 

 

beta-Sitosterol

C29H50O

414

 

 

beta-Amyrone

C30H48O

424

 

 

9,19-Cycloergost-24(28)-en-3-ol

C32H52O2

468

 

 

Lup-20(29)-en-3-one

C30H48O

424

 

 

Lupeol

C30H50O

426

 

 

Stigmasta-3,5-diene

C29H48

396

 

 

Alpha-Tocopherolquinone

C29H50O3

446

 

 

2.beta 4.beta 16.alpha Tribromoallopregn-16-ene-3

C21H27Br3O2

548

 

 

Xanthine, 8-[[4-[2-(4-aminophenyl)-1-carboxy] ethylamino] carbonyl] methoxyphenyl]-1,3-dipropyl

C28H32N6O6

548

 

 

Campesterol

C28H48O

400

 

 

CONCLUSION:

The present study successfully characterized the phytochemical composition of the hexane leaf extract of Hygrophila auriculata using Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS). More than 60 phytochemical constituents were identified, demonstrating the chemical diversity of the extract. The detected compounds included phenolics, sesquiterpenes, diterpenes, triterpenoids, phytosterols, and quinone derivatives, with notable constituents such as carvacrol, (Z,Z)-α-farnesene, trans-α-bergamotene, acetyleugenol, caryophyllene, α-humulene, neophytadiene, β-sitosterol, β-amyrone, lupeol, campesterol, stigmasta-3,5-diene, and α-tocopherolquinone. These compounds are known to possess a broad spectrum of biological activities, including antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, hepatoprotective, anticancer, and immunomodulatory properties. The predominance of terpenoids and phytosterols indicates that the hexane solvent efficiently extracted lipophilic bioactive metabolites, highlighting the therapeutic potential of the plant. The comprehensive GC–MS profile generated in this study provides valuable baseline information for the chemical standardization and quality assessment of H. auriculata leaf extracts. Furthermore, the findings scientifically support the traditional medicinal use of this species and emphasize its potential as a promising source of bioactive natural products for pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, and functional food applications. Future investigations should focus on the isolation and purification of the major phytochemicals, quantitative analysis, and in vitro and in vivo pharmacological studies to elucidate their mechanisms of action and validate their therapeutic potential.

REFERENCES

  1. Ahmad, I., & Mehmood, Z. (2017). Bioactive compounds of medicinal plants and their uses in traditional medicine. Phytochemistry Reviews, 16(4), 899-912.
  2. Ali, M. S., & Wang, S. (2020). Role of medicinal plants in modern pharmacology: Review. Pharmaceutical Biology, 58(1), 74-88.
  3. Aslam, S., & Lee, S. Y. (2019). Advances in medicinal plants: New opportunities for therapeutic applications. Journal of Medicinal Plant Research, 13(2), 40-56.
  4. Manisha, Ram Babu, Maajitha Begam, Kavita Shakya Chahal, Akshay Ashok Harale. Medicinal Plants and Traditional Uses and Modern Applications. Journal of Neonatal Surgery. 2025; 14 (3): 162-175.
  5. Doss, A. Antimicrobial activity of Hygrophila auriculata (Schumach.) Heine and Pergularia daemia Linn. African Journal of Plant Science. 2013; 7: 137–142.
  6. Megha Malpotra, Meenakshi Garg, Neha Singh, Susmita Dey Sadhu, Rajni Chopra et.al. An overview of bioactive components and phytopharmaceutical potentials of Hygrophila auriculata–A herbaceous medicinal plant. Phytomedicine Plus 5 (2025) 100737.
  7. Dhanalakshmi, Harikrishnan, Srinivasan, Pandian, Tanisha, Tharun Kumar et.al. A Perspective Overview on Hygrophila auriculata. Pharmacognosy Journal. 2020; 12 (6): 1748-1752.
  8. F Nishvanth, D Nagavalli and B Prem Kumar. Assessing the impact of solvent polarity on the phytochemical profile of Hygrophila auriculata leaf extracts. International Journal of Pharmacognosy and Clinical Research 2025; 7(2): 107-114.
  9. Suresh Kumar Jebamalai, Nirmala Ramachandran, Venkatraman Arumugam. Phytochemical and antimicrobial studies on Hygrophila auriculata Schumach. International Journal of Current Research in Biosciences and Plant Biology. (2021) 8(12), 23-31.
  10. Nishvanth F, Aswini B, Kalaiselvi G, Abinaya R, Sangeetha T. GC-MS-Based Profiling of Bioactive Phytoconstituents in the Methanolic Whole Plant Extract of Bryophyllum pinnatum (Lam.) Oken. Journal of International Research in Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2026; 21(3): 240–255.

Reference

  1. Ahmad, I., & Mehmood, Z. (2017). Bioactive compounds of medicinal plants and their uses in traditional medicine. Phytochemistry Reviews, 16(4), 899-912.
  2. Ali, M. S., & Wang, S. (2020). Role of medicinal plants in modern pharmacology: Review. Pharmaceutical Biology, 58(1), 74-88.
  3. Aslam, S., & Lee, S. Y. (2019). Advances in medicinal plants: New opportunities for therapeutic applications. Journal of Medicinal Plant Research, 13(2), 40-56.
  4. Manisha, Ram Babu, Maajitha Begam, Kavita Shakya Chahal, Akshay Ashok Harale. Medicinal Plants and Traditional Uses and Modern Applications. Journal of Neonatal Surgery. 2025; 14 (3): 162-175.
  5. Doss, A. Antimicrobial activity of Hygrophila auriculata (Schumach.) Heine and Pergularia daemia Linn. African Journal of Plant Science. 2013; 7: 137–142.
  6. Megha Malpotra, Meenakshi Garg, Neha Singh, Susmita Dey Sadhu, Rajni Chopra et.al. An overview of bioactive components and phytopharmaceutical potentials of Hygrophila auriculata–A herbaceous medicinal plant. Phytomedicine Plus 5 (2025) 100737.
  7. Dhanalakshmi, Harikrishnan, Srinivasan, Pandian, Tanisha, Tharun Kumar et.al. A Perspective Overview on Hygrophila auriculata. Pharmacognosy Journal. 2020; 12 (6): 1748-1752.
  8. F Nishvanth, D Nagavalli and B Prem Kumar. Assessing the impact of solvent polarity on the phytochemical profile of Hygrophila auriculata leaf extracts. International Journal of Pharmacognosy and Clinical Research 2025; 7(2): 107-114.
  9. Suresh Kumar Jebamalai, Nirmala Ramachandran, Venkatraman Arumugam. Phytochemical and antimicrobial studies on Hygrophila auriculata Schumach. International Journal of Current Research in Biosciences and Plant Biology. (2021) 8(12), 23-31.
  10. Nishvanth F, Aswini B, Kalaiselvi G, Abinaya R, Sangeetha T. GC-MS-Based Profiling of Bioactive Phytoconstituents in the Methanolic Whole Plant Extract of Bryophyllum pinnatum (Lam.) Oken. Journal of International Research in Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2026; 21(3): 240–255.

Photo
Nishvanth F.
Corresponding author

Assistant Professor cum Research Scholar, Department of Pharmacology, Adhiparasakthi College of Pharmacy, Melmaruvathur.

Photo
Aswini B.
Co-author

Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Adhiparasakthi College of Pharmacy, Melmaruvathur-603319.

Photo
Monika S.
Co-author

Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Adhiparasakthi College of Pharmacy, Melmaruvathur.

Photo
Kalaiselvi G.
Co-author

Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Karpaga Vinayaga Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chengalpat.

Photo
Jeyaprakash G.
Co-author

Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Surya School of Pharmacy, Vilupuram

Nishvanth F.*, Aswini B., Monika S., Kalaiselvi G., Jeyaprakash G., Phytochemical Characterization of Hexane Extract of Hygrophila Auriculata Leaves Through GC–MS Analysis, Int. J. Med. Pharm. Sci., 2026, 2 (8),0 542-549. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21932342

A Comprehensive Review of the Phytochemistry, Pharmacological Activities and The...
G. Abirami, T. Aiswariya, S. Bhavani, S. Anitha, P. Nandhagopal, D. Harini, A. Yazhini...
Comparative Analysis of Different Extracts of Musa Acuminata for In-Vitro Antiox...
Vikas Nale, Vaibhav Karande, Rohan Kolhe, R. R. Bendgude, Dhanshri Karande...
Related Articles
Guava (Psidium guajava L.) Leaf Bioactives: From Phytochemical Characterization ...
Jannatul Firdaus, Tanlaka Nuradin Fonyuy, Shahnawaz Ahmad, Khushi Rastogi, Anshika Yadav...
Evaluation of Anti-Arthritic Activity of Aqueous Extract of Portulacaria Afra in...
Shivam Yadav, Satyam Yadav, Dr. Sandeep Jain, Dr. Bharat Kumar Taygi...
Evaluation of the Neuroprotective Potential of Citrullus Lanatus Seeds: An In-Vi...
Mukesh Yadav, Sunita Arya, Shalini Jain, Rani Yadav, Neelam Yadav, K. S. Dadoriya, Jyoti Yadav, Gaur...
Determination and Quantification of Total Flavonoids Content in Malabar Spinach ...
Vardhineedi Shirisha, Seelamsetti Nagini, Parasa Santhi Sri, Konde Gopi Chand, Geddam Aravind, Dasar...