View Article

Abstract

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the group most often used in human and veterinary medicine, since they are available without prescription for the treatment of fever and minor pain. The clinical and pharmaceutical analysis of these drugs requires effective analytical procedures for quality control, as well as pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies. An extensive survey of the literature published in various analytical and pharmaceutical chemistry-related journals has been conducted regarding the instrumental analytical methods developed and used for the determination of various NSAIDs. Analytical method development and its validation is an important aspect of the drug discovery process. Reverse Phase-High Performance Liquid Chromatography (RP-HPLC) is the most common analytical method utilized for the analysis of drugs due to its accuracy, selectivity, and sensitivity. The development and validation of analytical methods provide accurate and precise data to ensure drug quality and safety. Several methods of analysis are reported and available for the estimation of NSAIDs, including RP-HPLC. This review article briefly discusses the analytical methods available for the estimation of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, specifically focusing on RP-HPLC.

Keywords

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, RP-HPLC, Method development, Analytical techniques

Introduction

× Popup Image

Overview of Non-Steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs

Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) are a diverse group of compounds with similar biological capabilities: all NSAIDs reduce or eliminate the erythema, swelling, elevated temperature and pain caused by a variety of inflammatory stimuli. The mechanisms of action of NSAIDs have not yet been fully elucidated, but evidence suggests that their anti-inflammatory effects are primarily achieved through inhibiting prostaglandin production. This mode of action is common to all NSAIDs [1]. The cyclooxygenase enzyme was first identified as the therapeutic target of NSAIDs by Vane in 1971, showing that these anti-inflammatory substances block the biosynthesis of prostaglandins (PGs) that contribute to a variety of physiological and pathophysiological functions [2]. The most prominent NSAIDs are aspirin, and naproxen, all available over the counter in most countries. Paracetamol (acetaminophen) is generally not considered an NSAID because it has only little anti-inflammatory activity. It treats pain mainly by blocking COX-2 mostly in the central nervous system, but not much in the rest of the body. Cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors, commonly called non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), such as ibuprofen, diclofenac, and naproxen, have anti-inflammatory and analgesic/antipyretic properties across a wide range of dosing regimens. Prescription-strength NSAIDs are effective for relief of chronic musculoskeletal pain and inflammation in conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or osteoarthritis (OA) [3]. All NSAIDs inhibit COX, an enzyme that converts arachidonic acid to prostaglandins, thereby mediating pain, inflammation, and fever. In the process, prostaglandin H2 is converted to five primary prostaglandins, including thromboxane A2 (which stimulates platelet aggregation and blood clot formation) in platelets and prostacyclin (a vasodilator that inhibits platelet aggregation) in the endothelium. Two COX isoenzymes (COX-1 and COX-2) are commonly recognized. In general, COX-1 is constitutively expressed and is involved in gastroprotection from stomach acid and in thromboxane formation by platelets. COX-2 is inducible by inflammatory mediators in a wide range of tissues and has been associated with inflammation; however, it may also be constitutively expressed, where it contributes to renal physiology, reproductive function, bone resorption, and neurotransmission. [4]

Fig 1. Mechanism Action of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs. [4]

Table No 1: Chemical classification of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents [5]

Class

Drugs

1.Salicylic acid derivatives

Acetyl salicylic acid (Aspirin), sodium salicylate, salicylamide

2. P-aminophenol derivatives

Paracetamol

3.2-Aryl propionic acid derivatives

Ibuprofen, ketoprofen, naproxen

4.Enolic acid derivatives

Meloxicam, piroxicam, tenoxicam, lornoxicam.

5. Arylalkanoic acid derivatives

Indomethacin, Diclofenac, aceclofenac, etodolac, sulindac.

6. N-Arylanthranilic acids

(fenamic acid)

Mefenamic acid, tolfenamic acid, meclofenamic acid

7. Selective COX-2 inhibitors

Celecoxib, rofecoxib, etoricoxib, parecoxib.

8. Sulphonilides

Nimesulide.

9. Benzoxazocine derivatives

Nefopam.

RP-HPLC Principle and Relevance in Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory    Drug Analysis

Basic Principle of RP-HPLC

Reverse Phase High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (RP-HPLC) is a widely used chromatographic technique that separates analytes based on their hydrophobic interactions with a non-polar stationary phase and a polar mobile phase [6]. Typically, C18 or C8 silica-based columns are employed, where non-polar compounds exhibit longer retention times compared to polar compounds [7]. The flexibility of RP-HPLC allows modification of the mobile phase composition, pH, and flow rate to achieve optimal separation, making it particularly suitable for multi-component drug formulations [8].

Comparison with Other Analytical Techniques

Although other analytical methods such as UV-spectrophotometry, spectrofluorimetry, and LC-MS/MS are used in pharmaceutical analysis, each has limitations compared to RP-HPLC. UV-spectrophotometry is simple and cost-effective but lacks specificity in multi-component analysis due to overlapping absorption spectra [9]. Spectrofluorimetry provides higher sensitivity than UV methods but is limited to fluorescent compounds and often requires derivatization steps [10]. LC-MS/MS, while highly sensitive and selective, involves higher costs, complex instrumentation, and extensive sample preparation, limiting its routine use in quality control [11]. In contrast, RP-HPLC provides the best balance of sensitivity, selectivity, reproducibility, and cost-effectiveness, making it the gold standard for estimation of NSAIDS.

Method Development Strategies

Selection of Stationary and Mobile Phases

The selection of appropriate stationary and mobile phases is critical for successful separation in RP-HPLC. Non-polar stationary phases such as octadecylsilane (C18) are most commonly used due to their ability to provide excellent resolution for a wide variety of drug molecules [9]. The mobile phase typically consists of a mixture of water (or buffer) and organic solvents such as methanol or acetonitrile, which are chosen based on analyte solubility and retention behavior [10]. Proper selection helps in achieving shorter run times and better peak symmetry [12].

pH and Buffer Optimization

pH plays a vital role in controlling the ionization state of analytes, which directly affects their retention time and resolution. For weakly acidic or basic drugs, selecting an optimal pH (usually between 2.5–7.5) ensures consistent ionization and sharp peaks [13]. Buffers such as phosphate or acetate are often used to maintain pH stability during analysis. Incorrect pH can lead to peak tailing, poor reproducibility, and reduced column life [14].

Column Selection (C18, C8, etc.)

Column selection is crucial for resolving drugs with diverse physicochemical properties. C18 columns are the most widely used due to their high hydrophobic interactions and versatility [9]. However, shorter-chain columns such as C8 or phenyl columns may be preferable for highly hydrophobic drugs or when faster analysis is required [8]. Selection often depends on the complexity of the drug mixture and desired run time [15].

Gradient vs Isocratic Methods

RP-HPLC uses both isocratic and gradient elution techniques. Isocratic techniques are straightforward, repeatable, and appropriate for formulations including analytes with comparable polarity. However, for complicated drug combinations with large polarity differences, gradient methods which entail a gradual shift in the mobile phase's composition are beneficial because they speed up analysis and increase resolution. [16]

Analytical Challenges in Estimation of NSAIDs

The analytical estimation of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) in pharmaceutical formulations and biological matrices presents several challenges due to their physicochemical properties and matrix-related interferences.

Chemical Diversity: NSAIDs exhibit wide structural diversity and varying pKa values, which complicates the development of a single analytical method suitable for all NSAIDs. Their acidic nature affects extraction efficiency and chromatographic behaviour.

Poor Aqueous Solubility: Many NSAIDs such as ibuprofen and diclofenac have low water solubility, leading to difficulties in dissolution, extraction, and reproducibility during analysis.

Matrix Interference: Pharmaceutical excipients may interfere with UV or chromatographic detection. Biological matrices (plasma, serum) contain proteins and endogenous compounds that can cause signal suppression or overlapping peaks, necessitating complex sample preparation. [17]

Lack of Selectivity in UV Methods: Most NSAIDs absorb in the UV region (200–300 nm), resulting in overlapping spectra and poor selectivity, especially in multi-component formulations.

Stability Issues: NSAIDs are susceptible to hydrolysis, oxidation, and photodegradation, which can affect assay accuracy unless proper storage and analytical conditions are maintained.

Low Concentration Levels: In biological samples, NSAIDs are present at very low concentrations, requiring highly sensitive analytical techniques such as HPLC or LC–MS/MS.

Chiral Nature: Some NSAIDs (e.g., ibuprofen, ketoprofen) are chiral, and enantiomers may differ in pharmacological activity, necessitating chiral separation techniques. Ensuring accuracy, precision, linearity, and robustness is challenging due to variability in formulations and biological matrices. [18]

Chromatographic Conditions for NSAIDS based on there classification:

1.Salicylic Acid Derivatives

Table No 2: chromatographic condition for salicylic acid derivatives

Name of Drug

Sample Matrix

Chromatographic Condition

Mobile Phase

Detector

Aspirin [19]

Tablet

Hypersil BDS C18 column (100×4.6 mm, 3µm)

Sodium perchlorate buffer (pH2.5): acetonitrile: isopropyl alcohol(85:14:1%v/v)

UV detection at 275 nm

Salicylamide [20]

Bulk API dosage form

C18 (250cm× 4.6 mm,5µm) column

Buffer: acetonitrile (40:60v/v). pH adjusting to 3.2

UV detection at 245 nm

2.P-aminophenol Derivatives

Table No 3: chromatographic condition for P-Aminophenol derivatives

Name of Drug

Sample Matrix

Chromatographic Condition

Mobile Phase

Detector

Paracetamol [21]

Tablet

Phenomenex C18 column (250 mm ×4.6 mm, 5µm)

Acetonitrile: water (60:40 v/v)

UV detection at 210 nm

3. 2-Arylpropionic Acid derivatives

Table No 4: chromatographic condition for 2-Arylpropionic acid derivatives

Name of Drug

Sample Matrix

Chromatographic Condition

Mobile Phase

Detector

Ibuprofen [22]

Tablet

Thermo hypersil BDS, C18(150 ×4.6mm ,5µm)

Buffer (HPLC grade water: triethylamine: orthophosphoric acid 1000:1.0:0.5 ml)

UV detection at 220 nm

Ketoprofen [23]

Tablet

LiChrosorb C18 column (250mm×4.6mm, 5µm)

Methanol: 0.1 M ammonium acetate buffer pH 6.9: triethylamine: acetonitrile (73:20:5:2) (v/v/v/v)

UV detection at 230 nm

Naproxen [24]

Tablet

Phenomenex C18 column (250 mm ×4.6 mm, 5µm)

Dibasic Sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.80: Acetonitrile (70:30) (v/v)

UV detection at 225 nm

4. Enolic Acid Derivatives

Table No 5: chromatographic condition for Enolic acid derivatives

Name of Drug

Sample Matrix

Chromatographic Condition

Mobile Phase

Detector

Meloxicam [25]

Tablet

Micro Bandapak 125A C18 (10µ) column

Methanol: water (70 :30 v/v)

UV detection at 230 nm

Piroxicam [26]

Tablet

SB-C18 Eclipse (150 mm×4.6mm,5 µm)

Acetonitrile: Water (50:50) (v/v)

UV detection at 360 nm

Naproxen [27]

Blood plasma

Hypersil C18 column (10 cm × 5mm,3µm)

ethanol: acetate buffer: acetonitrile (59:29:12 v/v/v)

UV detection at 328 nm

Lornoxicam [28]

Tablet

Eclipse C18 Column (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm)

Methanol:0.1% Fomic Acid in water (80:20 v/v)

UV detection at 381 nm

5. Arylalkanoic Acid Derivatives

Table No 6: chromatographic condition for Arylalkanoic acid derivatives

Name of Drug

Sample Matrix

Chromatographic Condition

Mobile Phase

Detector

Diclofenac sodium [29]

Bulk and Tablet formulation

Hypersil C18 column (250mm×4.6mm,5µm)

Acetonitrile: Phosphoric acid buffer pH7(50:50% v/v)

UV detection at 220 nm

Aceclofenac [30]

Tablet

Promesil C18 (250mm×4.6mm,5µm)

Water: acetonitrile (55:45 v/v)

UV detection at 277 nm

Etodolac [31]

Tablet

Phenomenex Luna C18(250 mm×4.6mm, 5µm)

Acetonitrile: Methanol (65:35 v/v)

UV detection a

Reference

  1. Vane Tr Ferreira SH (eds): Anti-inflammatory drugs. New York sringer-venag1979:348-83.
  2. Vane JR.  Inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis as a mechanism of action for aspirin like drugs. Nature 1971;231.
  3. Hata A W, Breyer R M. Pharmacology and    signaling of prostaglandin receptors; multiple   role   in inflammation and immune modulation. Pharmaco Ther2004; 103:147-66
  4. J. Kasturi, P.R. Palla, Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug: an overview, Journal of drug delivery and therapeutics,2019,9(1-s),442-448.
  5. Starek, M. and Krzek, j. 2009. A review of analytical techniques for determination of oxicams, nimesulide and nabumetone Talanta, 77 (3):925–942.
  6. Dolan, J. W. (2013). Controlling Peak Tailing—Causes and Fixes. LCGC North America, 31(12): 986–993.
  7. Snyder, L. R., Dolan, J. W., & Carr, P. W. (2014). The Hydrophobic-Subtraction Model of Reversed-Phase Column Selectivity. J. Chromatogr. A, 1060: 77–116.
  8. Sahu, P. K., Ramisetti, N. R., Cecchi, T., Swain, S., & Patro, C. S. (2018). HPLC Method Development and Validation—A Review. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 147: 590–611.
  9. Dong, M. W. (2013). Modern HPLC for Practicing Scientists. 2nd ed. Hoboken: Wiley.
  10. Snyder, L. R., Kirkland, J. J., & Dolan, J. W. (2010). Introduction to Modern Liquid Chromatography. 3rd ed. Hoboken: Wiley.
  11. Niessen, W. M. A. (2017). Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry. 4th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
  12. Rao, R. N., & Babu, K. S. (2019). Strategies for Separation of Multi-Component Drug Products by RP-HPLC. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 164: 129–146.
  13. Swartz, M. E., & Krull, I. S. (2012). Handbook of Analytical Validation. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
  14. K.V. Nikam, S. Shinde, Dr.V.K. Redasani, A Review on analytical method development and validation (with case study), IJPRA Journal, vol 9, June-2024, 1305-1318.
  15. Dolan, J. W. (2009). Selectivity in RPLC—Choosing the Best Column. LCGC North America, 27(10): 870–876.
  16. M.S. Patil, Dr. R.R.Patil, Analytical method development and validation: A review, IJPBA, vol 7, June-2019, 70-81.
  17. Beckett, A. H., & Stenlake, J. B. Practical Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Vol. II, 4th Ed., CBS Publishers, New Delhi.
  18. Rao, J. R., & Murthy, S. S. N. “Analytical methods for determination of NSAIDs in pharmaceutical formulations,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis.
  19. Jamadar, L. et al. 2010. Analytical Method Development and Validation for aspirin. International Journal of ChemTech Research CODEN, 2(1):389-399.
  20. Desai, N. 2015. Simultaneous Rp-HPLC determination of salicylamide, salicylic acid and deferasirox in the bulk API dosage forms. Journal of Taibah University for Science, 9(2):245-251.
  21. Solanki, P. and Boob, S. 2012. RP-HPLC Method for estimation of Paracetamol from Pharmaceutical Formulation Febrinil. Scientific Reviews & Chemical Communication, 2(3):232-236
  22. Pattanaik, S et al. 2013. Assay method development and validation of ibuprofen tablets by HPLC. Pelagia Research Library, 4(4):91-96
  23. Tsvetkova, B. and Peikova, L. 2013. HPLC Determination of ketoprofen in tablet dosage form. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 1:55-59.
  24. S Tanjin, F Islam, Development and Validation of a Simple RP-HPLC Method for Determination of Naproxen in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms, Bangladesh Pharmaceutical Journal 16(2): 137-141, 2013.
  25. Arayne, MS. Sultana, N. 2005. A new RP-HPLC method for analysis of meloxicam in tablets. Pak J Pharm Sci, 18(1):58 62.
  26. A.N. Panainte, M. Vieriu, Fast HPLC method for the determination of piroxicam and its application to stability study, REV.CHIM(Bucharest),68, No.4, 2017,701-706.
  27. Madni, MA et al. 2016. Determination of Tenoxicam in the plasma by reverse phase-HPLC method using single step extraction technique: A reliable and cost-effective approach. Acta Pol Pharm, 73(5):1123-1128.
  28. M. Attimarad, rapid RP HPLC method for quantitative determination of lornoxicam in tablets, journal of basic and clinical pharmacy, Vol-01,2010,115-118.
  29. Labhade, S. Chaudhari, S. Saudagar, R. 2018. Development and validation of RP-HPLC method for simultaneous determination of Diclofenac sodium and Tizanidine hydrochloride in bulk and tablet formulation. Journal of Analytical & Pharmaceutical Research,7(2):244-247.
  30. Sharma, S. and Chippa, R. 2011. RP-HPLC Method for estimation of Aceclofenac in tablet dosage form. International Journal of Drug Research and Technology, 1(1):1-7.
  31. B. Biswal, S. Mondal, P. Mondal, UV Spectrophotometric and Stability Indicating RP-HPLC Assay Methods for the Estimation of Etodolac in Bulk and Tablet Dosage Form, Int. J. Pharm. Investigation,2019;9(2):53-58.
  32. Lixia, J. 2000-03. Rapid Analysis of Sulindac in Human Serum by HPLC. Chinese Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis, 20(3):164-164.
  33. B.R. Dhumal, K.P. Bhusari, Stability Indicating Method for the Determination of Mefenamic Acid in Pharmaceutical Formulations by HPLC, Journal of applied pharmaceutical science, vol.4, 2014, 60-64.
  34. S.H. Kazi, M.A. Sheraz, S.G. Musharraf, Analysis of Tolfenamic Acid using a Simple, Rapid, and Stability-indicating Validated HPLC Method, anti-inflammatory and anti-allergy agents in medical chemistry, vol.23, 2024, 52-70.
  35. V. Palaparthi, E.R. Gope, Development and Validation of a Stability-Indicating RP HPLC Method for Quantitative Analysis of Celecoxib in Pharmaceutical Formulations, Journal of pharma insight and research,2025.03(05),43-51.
  36. Y.K. Tadikonda, M. Dhanalakshmi, RP-HPLC Method Development and Validation of Rofecoxib in Bulk and Dosage Form, Int. J. Adv. Pharm. Biotech (2019), 5(2),01-05.
  37. Topalli, S. Mathrusri, A. 2012. Validated RP-HPLC Method for the Assay of Etoricoxib (A Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug) in pharmaceutical dosage forms. E-Journal of Chemistry, 9(2):832-838.
  38. P. Reddy, Determination of Nimesulide in Pharmaceutical formulations and in Human serum by Reverse-Phase High Performance Liquid Chromatography, Journal of PharmTech Research, Vol 1,2009, 206-209.
  39. Aymard, G et al. 2002. Sensitive determination of nefopam and its metabolite desmethyl-nefopam in human biological fluids by HPLC. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 30(4):1013-1021.

Photo
Nitin Tayade
Corresponding author

Research and Development Dept, Blue cross Laboratories Pvt, Ltd, A-12 MIDC Ambad, Nashik, 422010

Photo
Deepak Dhake
Co-author

Research and Development Dept, Blue cross Laboratories Pvt, Ltd, A-12 MIDC Ambad, Nashik, 422010

Photo
Dr. Manoj Magar
Co-author

Research and Development Dept, Blue cross Laboratories Pvt, Ltd, A-12 MIDC Ambad, Nashik, 422010

Photo
Dipak Dhote
Co-author

Research and Development Dept, Blue cross Laboratories Pvt, Ltd, A-12 MIDC Ambad, Nashik, 422010

Photo
Kirti Deshmukh
Co-author

Research and Development Dept, Blue cross Laboratories Pvt, Ltd, A-12 MIDC Ambad, Nashik, 422010

Nitin Tayade*, Deepak Dhake, Dr. Manoj Magar, Dipak Dhote, Kirti Deshmukh, Reversed Phase HPLC Methods for the Analysis of Non-Steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs: A Comprehensive Review, Int. J. Med. Pharm. Sci., 2026, 2 (1), 226-233. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18283477

More related articles
Analytical Method Development and Validation for t...
Shubham Urade, Vikas Shinde, Shinde Shubham, Sameer Davkhar, Prat...
Development and Validation of Reverse Phase High P...
Sharad Rode, Sandeep More, Pooja Deshpande, Dinesh Dantkale, Dhan...
Anti-Inflammatory Effect of an Ethanolic Extract o...
V. Venkata Rajesham, Siddartha Goutham Reddy Banda, Prasanna Kuma...
Related Articles
Advances in Simultaneous RP-HPLC Methods for Multi-Component Analysis of Antidia...
Amol Landge, Sagar Dalvi, Dr. Manoj Magar, Deepak Dhake...
Simultaneous Quantitative Estimation of Antifungal Combinations in Bulk and Dosa...
Pratiksha Ahire, Sushil Patil, Shubham Urade, Shubham Shinde, Sameer Davkhar...
Formulation and In Vitro Evaluation of a Self-Emulsifying Drug Delivery System o...
Abhinandan Satapathy, Sradhanjali Patra, P. N. Tapaswini Behera...
Analytical Method Development and Validation for the Estimation of Anticancer Dr...
Shubham Urade, Vikas Shinde, Shinde Shubham, Sameer Davkhar, Pratiksha Ahire...
More related articles
Analytical Method Development and Validation for the Estimation of Anticancer Dr...
Shubham Urade, Vikas Shinde, Shinde Shubham, Sameer Davkhar, Pratiksha Ahire...
Development and Validation of Reverse Phase High Performance Liquid Chromatograp...
Sharad Rode, Sandeep More, Pooja Deshpande, Dinesh Dantkale, Dhananjay Patil...
Anti-Inflammatory Effect of an Ethanolic Extract of Ficus Dalhousiae Miq Whole P...
V. Venkata Rajesham, Siddartha Goutham Reddy Banda, Prasanna Kumar Lankalapalli, K. Manjeera, Harish...
Analytical Method Development and Validation for the Estimation of Anticancer Dr...
Shubham Urade, Vikas Shinde, Shinde Shubham, Sameer Davkhar, Pratiksha Ahire...
Development and Validation of Reverse Phase High Performance Liquid Chromatograp...
Sharad Rode, Sandeep More, Pooja Deshpande, Dinesh Dantkale, Dhananjay Patil...
Anti-Inflammatory Effect of an Ethanolic Extract of Ficus Dalhousiae Miq Whole P...
V. Venkata Rajesham, Siddartha Goutham Reddy Banda, Prasanna Kumar Lankalapalli, K. Manjeera, Harish...