View Article

Abstract

A chronic autoimmune disease that can affect numerous organs, rheumatoid arthritis (RA) most commonly affects the synovial joints. The cartilage and bone in these joints are gradually eroded by persistent inflammation, which finally results in obvious abnormalities and loss of joint function. Genetic vulnerability, environmental exposures, and anomalies in immune regulation interact in a complex way to cause the condition. These elements sustain a milieu of chronic inflammation and interfere with proper cytokine signalling. The Janus kinase/signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK/STAT) system, which regulates a variety of cytokine-driven immune responses, is one of the key pathways involved. Excessive activation of this route promotes the development of autoantibodies, upsets the balance of immune cells, and quickens the deterioration of joints. Targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic medications, including upadacitinib, baricitinib, and tofacitinib, have become viable substitutes for biologic DMARDs in recent years due to their potent therapeutic efficacy. Notwithstanding their advantages, ongoing studies are assessing their long-term safety profiles, paying special emphasis to hazards like infections, cancers, blood-related problems, and thromboembolic events. Organisations like the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR), and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) frequently update treatment recommendations and clinical guidelines to encourage the safe and effective use of these treatments. In this review, the molecular framework of rheumatoid arthritis is analyzed in detail, focusing on the JAK/STAT signaling mechanism, cytokine receptor communication and the evolving role of JAK inhibitors in precision-targeted therapy.

Keywords

Tofacitinib, baricitinib, DMARDs, EMA, FDA, EULAR

Introduction

× Popup Image

Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic autoimmune disorder that affects millions globally, leading to significant joint dysfunction and a substantial decline in overall quality of life [1]. The incidence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) rose by 13.2% to 11.8 per 100,000 individuals worldwide between 1990 and 2021. Ireland and West Berkshire, UK, reported the highest rates, while Oman experienced the fastest growth and Africa the lowest. In 2021, RA affected over 17.9 million individuals, a 14.4% rise since 1990. Although RA was most common in those over 55, cases among younger adults (20–54) have grown since 2015, particularly in high-SDI regions, with some areas showing bimodal age patterns [2].  Rheumatoid arthritis has an uncertain natural history, with a variable clinical course and unpredictable prognosis. About 1-3% of people have it, and although women are almost three times more likely than males to have it, this female predominance declines with age. Moreover, evidence suggests that the disease has a genetic component [3]. It involves gradual and irreversible damage to joints lined with synovium, leading to loss of joint space, bone deterioration, impaired function and deformities. Breakdown of the extracellular matrix is a key process in rheumatoid arthritis, contributing to the gradual damage of cartilage, ligaments, tendons, and bone. RA typically presents as a symmetrical arthritis. Affected joints and surrounding tissues often exhibit swelling and tenderness, accompanied by morning stiffness and significant limitation in movement [4].

Figure 1: Key Joints Prone to Pain and Swelling in Arthritis

Environmental causes and a genetic predisposition combine to cause rheumatoid arthritis (RA). When CD4+ T cells identify antigens in the synovial tissue, macrophages, monocytes, and fibroblasts are activated, which initiates the disease. These immune cells release extracellular matrix-degrading enzymes and pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α, IL-1, and IL-6, which contribute to the deterioration of bone and cartilage. Other T cell-produced cytokines, including interferon-γ, IL-2, IL-10, and IL-12, show an immunological response that is mostly Th1-driven. By activating resident joint cells, TNF-α and IL-1 intensify the inflammatory process and maintain an ongoing cycle of inflammation. Understanding these processes has influenced the creation of treatments that target immune cells and cytokines to prevent joint deterioration [5]. The primary aims of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment are to reduce pain, prevent lasting joint damage, and maintain patients’ daily functioning and overall quality of life. Disease-modifying antirheumatic medications (DMARDs) must be administered as soon as possible; methotrexate is frequently advised as the initial treatment. Depending on the severity and response of the illness, other traditional DMARDs such hydroxychloroquine, leflunomide, sulfasalazine, azathioprine, and cyclosporine may be given singly or in combination. Biologic agents including TNF blockers and therapies that inhibit T-cell co-stimulation provide valuable options for individuals who do not achieve adequate improvement with standard treatments. However, their use is associated with an increased susceptibility to infections, particularly the reactivation of tuberculosis. For patients whose rheumatoid arthritis remains difficult to control, newer targeted synthetic DMARDs have been introduced, such as the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, filgotinib and ruxolitinib [6]. Protein phosphorylation, mediated by signaling kinases, is a key mechanism in intracellular communication [7]. The human genome encodes 518 kinases grouped into eight families, with 90 classified as tyrosine kinases, including Janus kinases (JAKs). Janus kinases (JAKs) play a major role in the pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and are crucial parts of the signalling pathways utilised by growth factors, hormones, and cytokines. In the treatment of RA, tofacitinib, which mainly targets JAK1 and JAK3 with some activity on JAK2 and Tyk2, has shown remarkable efficacy and good tolerability. Other JAK inhibitors, such as baricitinib, filgotinib, and peficitinib, have been developed as a result of its clinical success [8] [9]. Focusing on rheumatoid arthritis, this review examines how JAK inhibitors modulate disease pathways, their clinical effectiveness, safety considerations and their emerging role in tailoring individualized therapies.

Pathophysiology

Genetics of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have greatly expanded our knowledge of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by uncovering numerous single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that contribute to an individual’s genetic risk for developing the condition. Most of these variations influence immune system regulation and are often shared with other inflammatory conditions. The HLA gene complex shows the strongest connection to RA. Specific HLA alleles, especially within the HLA-DR region, are thought to affect how antigens are presented to immune cells. This interaction not only influences the likelihood of developing RA but also helps predict disease progression, complications, and outcomes. Several non-HLA genes also contribute to disease development. Variants in genes such as CD28, CD40, and PTPN22 are involved in immune signaling, cell activation, and inflammatory pathways, which can disrupt immune balance and promote chronic inflammation. Beyond genetic factors, autoantibodies significantly influence rheumatoid arthritis (RA) development and diagnosis. Rheumatoid factor targets IgG and is common in RA, whereas highly specific ACPAs often appear before symptoms and play an important role in disease progression [10]. Epigenetic mechanisms, which reflect the interplay of genetic and environmental factors, significantly influence the onset of this disease. Recent large-scale research has identified ten genetic locations associated with heightened disease risk. Normally, DNA methylation and histone acetylation regulate leukocyte and fibroblast functions, but disturbances in these processes are linked to rheumatoid arthritis [11].

 

Figure 2: Integrated molecular framework of rheumatoid arthritis pathogenesis.

Immune System Dysregulation in Rheumatoid Arthritis

A severe inflammatory condition associated with substantial joint destruction and increased mortality is seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Complement activation and inflammation are brought on by immunological complex formation, which is linked to its severity. A major diagnostic breakthrough was the discovery of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs), which recognize citrullinated self-antigens and may appear nearly a decade before clinical symptoms, indicating an early preclinical phase of rheumatoid arthritis. Increasing ACPA levels and pro-inflammatory cytokines drive disease progression. ACPAs also activate osteoclasts and macrophages, contributing to bone erosion and inflammation. Effective treatment reduces rheumatoid factor (RF) and ACPAs. Additional autoantibodies, including anti-acetylated peptide and anti-carbamylated antibodies, further reflect RA’s complex autoimmune nature [12] [13].  Joint inflammation arises from immune system activation, leading to synovial membrane inflammation and infiltration of leukocytes into the synovial cavity. Joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis develops through the combined actions of innate and adaptive immune mechanisms. Analysis of synovial tissue at the molecular and histological levels has identified lymphoid, fibroid, and myeloid-predominant inflammatory patterns. Recognizing these subtypes is crucial for guiding targeted treatments and achieving better clinical outcomes [14]. Cytokines and chemokines such as GM-CSF, TNF, and IL-6 are major regulators of inflammatory activity, while IL-1 has a comparatively limited influence within this intricate immune signaling system. These mediators trigger endothelial activation, cellular infiltration and fibroblast proliferation. Activated fibroblasts promote osteoclastogenesis through RANKL signaling, leading to bone resorption. Simultaneously, cytokine induced activation of chondrocytes enhances matrix degradation via metalloproteinases, ultimately resulting in cartilage and joint tissue destruction [15].

Figure 3: Multisystem Impact of Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Illustrated Overview

JAK/STAT Pathway

  1. Overview

Essential signaling cascade regulating immune responses, cellular development, and tissue homeostasis. Consists of the following four Janus kinases (JAKs): TYK2, JAK1, JAK2 and JAK3.
Contains seven STAT proteins: STAT1–STAT6 (including STAT5a and STAT5b).

  1. Mechanism of Action

Cytokine binding activates JAKs.

Receptors are phosphorylated by active JAKs.
STAT proteins undergo dimerisation, phosphorylation and recruitment. To control gene expression, STAT dimers go to the nucleus.

  1. Distinct Roles of JAKs

JAK1: Promotes immune cell activation and hematopoiesis.

JAK2: Responds to growth factors.

JAK3: Involved in endothelial signaling.

TYK2: Mediates interferon and interleukin pathways.

  1. Roles of STATs

Control Th1, Th2, Th17, and regulatory T cell development. Regulate the activity of natural killer and dendritic cells.

  1. JAK/STAT in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

Abnormal activation drives inflammation, joint damage, and tissue fibrosis. Dysregulated STAT activity and reduced negative regulators highlight therapeutic potential [16].

  1. Role in Disease

Dysregulated JAK/STAT signaling can result from JAK mutations or continuous TYK2 activity.

Linked to

  1. Abnormal hematopoietic stem cell development
  2. Blood cancers
  3. Autoimmune conditions
  4. Certain immunodeficiencies [17].
  1.  Immunological Function and Therapeutic Targeting

JAK inhibitors (Jakinibs) modulate

  1. Natural killer cells
  2. T cells
  3. Dendritic cells

These processes are important in autoimmune disease onset and progression [18]. Type I and II cytokine transmission are disrupted by pharmacological JAK inhibition [19].

Effective in treating autoimmune conditions

  1. Rheumatoid arthritis
  2. Inflammatory bowel disease
  3. Psoriasis [20].
  1. Structural Features of JAKs

Contain JAK homology (JH) regions: JH1 to JH7 (C-terminal to N-terminal) [21] [22].

JH2 domain: previously considered catalytic, now a pseudo-kinase (limited catalytic function) [23].

JH4 to JH7 domains

  1. Regulate JAK interactions with other kinases.
  2. Facilitate receptor binding.
  3. Control catalytic activity and autophosphorylation.
  4. Can suppress JAK activity in some cases [24].
  1.  STAT Proteins and Signaling

Normally inactive in cytoplasm.

These proteins connect to cytokine–receptor complexes via SH2 domains (for example, IL-6 interacting with IL-6Rα/gp130). After being phosphorylated, STAT proteins pair up and migrate into the nucleus, where they attach to defined DNA sequences and direct the activation or suppression of target genes [25] [26].

Table 1: Cytokine Recognition by Receptors and Their JAK/STAT Signaling Profiles [27] [28]

Cytokine(s)

Receptor Family

JAKs

STATs

IL-4

γc family

Jak3, Jak1

STAT6

EGF, PDGF

Receptor tyrosine kinases

Jak2

STAT5, STAT1, STAT3

GM-CSF

ßc family

Jak2

STAT5

IL-12

gp130

Jak2, Tyk2

STAT4

IFN-α/β

Interferon family

Jak1, Tyk2

STAT1, STAT3, STAT4, STAT5, STAT2

IFN-γ

Interferon family

Jak1, Jak2

STAT1

IL-10

Interferon family

Jak1, Tyk2

STAT3

IL-11, IL-6, OSM, LIF

gp130

Jak1, Tyk2, Jak2

STAT3, STAT1

IL-7, IL-2, IL-15, IL-9,

γc family

Jak1, Jak3

STAT3, STAT5

Figure 4: JAK–STAT Dynamics in RA

Ongoing inflammation within the synovial tissue is a defining feature of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a long-lasting autoimmune disorder in which continuous immune-driven damage steadily wears down cartilage and bone, ultimately leading to joint deformities and impaired mobility [29-31]. Excessive release of pro-inflammatory cytokines from activated synovial cells such as tumour necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin-1 (IL-1), and IL-6 serves as a central driver of rheumatoid arthritis, fueling its underlying disease processes [32-34]. These cytokines exert much of their inflammatory effect by stimulating the Janus kinase signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK–STAT) pathway, a crucial intracellular signaling route that orchestrates immune regulation [35-38] . Within the arthritic joint, synovial fibroblasts play a central role in driving inflammation and structural damage. Activation of STAT4 prompts these cells to secrete large amounts of IL-6, intensifying persistent inflammation and speeding up joint degradation [39]. Mori and colleagues reported that elevated cytokine activity in RA maintains a self-reinforcing IL-6–STAT3 signaling cycle, which perpetuates tissue injury and chronic inflammatory responses [40]. In addition, fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLSs) from patients with active RA show increased STAT1 expression, reinforcing ongoing immune activation within the joint [41] [42]. Enhanced STAT3 activity in synovial CD4? T cells disrupts the Th17/Treg equilibrium and is linked to more aggressive synovial inflammation. Additionally, increased expression of JAK3, STAT4, and STAT6 has been observed in CD1a? dendritic cells, indicating potential molecular signatures of RA within the synovial environment [43-47]. Studies in proteoglycan-induced arthritis and other experimental models demonstrate that IL-4 inhibits IL-12–STAT4 signaling, underscoring its anti-inflammatory properties. In rheumatoid arthritis, transcriptomic and pathway analyses show marked elevation of type I interferon–responsive genes in peripheral blood, connecting heightened interferon activity to ongoing inflammation and worsening disease [48] [49]. Moreover, this regulatory network is strongly influenced by noncoding RNAs. For instance, miR-17 suppresses STAT3 and JAK1, thereby lowering the release of IL-6 and IL-1β, while LINC-PINT enhances SOCS1 expression, diminishing TNF-α–driven fibroblast activation [50]. The introduction of JAK inhibitors as targeted disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) has significantly reshaped the management of RA. These medications effectively diminish synovial inflammation, overall inflammatory burden, and functional decline. The 2019 European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations regard JAK inhibitors as comparable to biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) in patients who do not achieve adequate control with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) [51-53]. Real-world studies indicate that JAK inhibitors deliver superior therapeutic benefits compared to methotrexate when used as second-line treatment options [54-57]. Chen et al. discovered the JAK3-selective inhibitor Z583, which covalently attaches to the cysteine 909 (Cys909) residue on JAK3, blocking its activation and markedly slowing the advancement of rheumatoid arthritis [58].

Table 2: Intersections of Cytokine–Jak/STAT Signaling with Neural Pain and Cognitive Circuits [59]

Cytokine (Ligand/Receptor)

Jak/STAT Components Affected

Observed or Proposed Effects on Pain and Cognition

GM-CSF / GM-CSFR

Jak2, STAT3, STAT5

Enhances pain sensitivity (hyperalgesia),

Encourages sodium channel expression to rise. Nav1.7–Nav1.9.

IL-4R / IL-4

Jak3, Jak1, STAT6, STAT1, STAT3

Pain hypersensitivity is lessened by overexpression, while IL-4 shortage is associated with social improvement but may also cause mechanical allodynia and cognitive deterioration.

IFN-γR / IFN-γ

Jak2, Jak1, STAT3, STAT1,

Implicated in onset and persistence of pain,

Deficiency in IFN-γ or its receptor alters social behavior, May have an impact on inhibitory GABAergic neurones.

IL-1R / IL-1β

IL-6–STAT3 axis-based indirect activation

Contributes to pain initiation,

May impair cognitive processes.

gp130 / IL-27

STAT5a/b, STAT3 TYK2, STAT1

employs gp130 for signalling; pain perception is reduced when gp130 expression is lower.

sIL-6R, IL-6 / IL-6R

Jak1, Jak2, TYK2, STAT3

Acts as a pro-nociceptive mediator,

Drives hyperalgesia/allodynia in animal models, May also cause cognitive impairment.

IL-18R / IL-18

STAT4, TYK2

Determined to be a pro-nociceptive cytokine.

IL-17RA / IL-17

STAT3, Jak2, STAT1

Encourages tactile allodynia.

IL-10R / IL-10

STAT3, Jak1

It has pain-relieving (anti-nociceptive) properties.

IL-12R / IL-12

STAT4, TYK2

Triggers the release of pro-nociceptive cytokines such IFN-γ and TNF.

TNF-α / TNFR1, TNFR2

Indirect via IFN-β–Jak/STAT and STAT1 signaling

Initiates and sensitizes pain pathways (mechanical and thermal),

Contributes to neuropathic pain, Negatively impacts cognition.

IL-15Rα / IL-15, γC, IL-2Rβ

Jak1, STAT5, Jak3

Interacts with osteoarthritis pain intensity,
May cause neuropathic pain.

IL-22R / IL-22

STAT3, Jak1

Inhibiting IL-22, which is upregulated in arthritic models, lessens pain reactions.

Reference

  1. Albiss L, Muflih S, Hijazi B, et al. Disease knowledge and quality of life among rheumatoid arthritis patients: a cross-sectional study. BMC Rheumatol. 2025; 9:77. doi:10.1186/s41927-025-00523-w.
  2. Jin W, Wang Q, Jin C, Xue M, Pan L, Zeng Y, et al. Spatiotemporal distributions and regional disparities of rheumatoid arthritis in 953 global to local locations, 1980–2040, with deep learning-empowered forecasts and evaluation of interventional policies’ benefits. Ann Rheum Dis. 2025;84 1104-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ard.2025.04.009.
  3. Grassi W, De Angelis R, Lamanna G, Cervini C. The clinical features of rheumatoid arthritis. Eur J Radiol. 1998;27(Suppl 1): S18–24. doi:10.1016/S0720-048X (98)00038-2.
  4. Smolen JS, Aletaha D, McInnes IB. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 2016;388(10055):2023–38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30173-8.
  5. Doan T, Massarotti E. Rheumatoid arthritis: an overview of new and emerging therapies. J Clin Pharmacol. 2005;45(7):751-762. doi:10.1177/0091270005277938.
  6. Yap HY, Tee SZY, Wong MMT, Chow SK, Peh SC, Teow SY. Pathogenic role of immune cells in rheumatoid arthritis: implications in clinical treatment and biomarker development. Cells. 2018;7(10):161. doi:10.3390/cells7100161.
  7. Hunter T. The age of crosstalk: phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and beyond. Mol Cell. 2007 Dec 14;28(5):730–8. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.019.
  8. Karaman MW, Herrgard S, Treiber DK, Gallant P, Atteridge CE, Campbell BT, et al. A quantitative analysis of kinase inhibitor selectivity. Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Jan;26(1):127–32. doi: 10.1038/nbt1358.
  9. Ghoreschi K, Jesson MI, Li X, Lee JL, Ghosh S, Alsup JW, et al. Modulation of innate and adaptive immune responses by tofacitinib (CP-690,550). J Immunol. 2011 Apr 1;186(7):4234–43. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003486.
  10. Kurkó J, Besenyei T, Laki J, Glant TT, Mikecz K, Szekanecz Z. Genetics of rheumatoid arthritis a comprehensive review. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2013;45(2):170-179. doi:10.1007/s12016-012-8346-7.
  11. Raychaudhuri S. Recent advances in the genetics of rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2010;22(2): 109-118.doi:10.1097/BOR.0b013e328336474d.
  12. Song YW, Kang EH. Autoantibodies in rheumatoid arthritis: rheumatoid factors and anticitrullinated protein antibodies. QJM. 2010;103(3):139-146. doi:10.1093/qjmed/hcp165.
  13. Cope AP. T cells in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2008;10(Suppl 1): S1. doi:10.1186/ar2412.
  14. Demoruelle MK, Deane KD, Holers VM. When and where does inflammation begin in rheumatoid arthritis? Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2014;26(1):64 71.doi:10.1097/BOR.0000000000000017.
  15. Isomäki P, Punnonen J. Pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Med. 1997;29(6):499-507. doi:10.3109/07853899709007474.
  16. Kie?bowski K, Plewa P, Bratborska AW, Bakiniowska E, Pawlik A. JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: immunomodulatory properties and clinical efficacy. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(15):8327. doi:10.3390/ijms25158327.
  17. Meyer SC, Levine RL. Molecular pathways: molecular basis for sensitivity and resistance to JAK kinase inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(8):2051–2059. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0279.
  18. McLornan DP, Khan AA, Harrison CN. Immunological consequences of JAK inhibition: friend or foe? Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2015;10(4):370–379. doi: 10.1007/s11899-015-0284-z.
  19. Schwartz DM, Bonelli M, Gadina M, O’Shea JJ. Type I/II cytokines, JAKs, and new strategies for treating autoimmune diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2016;12(1):25–36. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2015.167.
  20. Schwartz DM, Kanno Y, Villarino A, Ward M, Gadina M, O’Shea JJ. JAK inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for immune and inflammatory diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16(12):843–862. doi 10.1038/nrd.2017.267.
  21. Malemud CJ, Pearlman E. Targeting JAK/STAT signaling pathway in inflammatory diseases. Curr Signal Transduct Ther. 2009;4(3):201–221.
  22. Leonard WJ, O’Shea JJ. JAKs and STATs: biological implications. Annu Rev Immunol. 1998; 16:293–322.
  23. Giordanetto P, Kroemer RT. Prediction of the structure of human Janus kinase (JAK2) comprising JAK homology domains 1 through 7. Protein Eng. 2002;15(9):727–737.
  24. Haan S, Margue C, Engrand A, et al. Dual role of the JAK1 FERM and kinase domains in cytokine receptor binding and stimulation-dependent JAK activation. J Immunol. 2008;180(2):998–1007.
  25. Darnell JR Jr. STATs and gene regulation. Science. 1997;277(5332):1630–1635.
  26. Malemud CJ. Suppression of pro-inflammatory cytokines via targeting of STAT-responsive genes. In: El-Shemy H, editor. Drug Discovery. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech Publishing; 2013. p. 373-411.
  27. Kisseleva T, Bhattacharya S, Braunstein J, Schindler CW. Signaling through the JAK/STAT pathway: recent advances and future challenges. Gene. 2002;285(1-2):1-24. doi:10.1016/S0378-1119(02)00398-0.
  28. Gadina M, Hilton D, Johnston JA, Morinobu A, Lighvani A, Zhou YJ, Visconti R, O’Shea JJ. Signaling by type I and II cytokine receptors: ten years after. Curr Opin Immunol. 2001;13(3):363-73. doi:10.1016/S0952-7915(00)00228-4.
  29. Firestein GS. Evolving concepts of rheumatoid arthritis. Nature. 2003;423(6937):356–361. doi:10.1038/nature01661.
  30. Scott DL, Wolfe F, Huizinga TW. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 2010;376(9746):1094–1108. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60826-4.
  31. Scherer HU, Häupl T, Burmester GR. The etiology of rheumatoid arthritis. J Autoimmun. 2020;110:102400.
  32. McInnes IB, Schett G. The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(23):2205–2219. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1004965.
  33. Noack M, Miossec P. Selected cytokine pathways in rheumatoid arthritis. Semin Immunopathol. 2017;39(3):365–383.
  34. Pieringer H, Studnicka-Benke A. What is causing my arthritis, doctor? A glimpse beyond the usual suspects in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. QJM. 2013;106(3):219–228.
  35. Lubberts E. The IL-23-IL-17 axis in inflammatory arthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015;11(7):415–429.
  36. Genovese MC, et al. Effect of filgotinib vs placebo on clinical response in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis refractory to disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy: the FINCH 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;322(3):315–325.
  37. Kavanaugh A, et al. Filgotinib (GLPG0634/GS-6034), an oral selective JAK1 inhibitor, is effective as monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results from a randomised, dose-finding study (DARWIN 2). Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(6):1009–1019.
  38. Combe B, et al. Filgotinib versus placebo or adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate: a phase III randomised clinical trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80(7):848–858.
  39. Nguyen HN, et al. Autocrine loop involving IL-6 family member LIF, LIF Receptor, and STAT4 drives sustained fibroblast production of inflammatory mediators. Immunity. 2017;46(2):220–232.
  40. Mori T, et al. IL-1β and TNFα-initiated IL-6-STAT3 pathway is critical in mediating inflammatory cytokines and RANKL expression in inflammatory arthritis. Int Immunol. 2011;23(11):701–712.
  41. Kasperkovitz PV, et al. Activation of the STAT1 pathway in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63(2):233–239.
  42. Van der Pouw Kraan TC, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis is a heterogeneous disease: evidence for differences in the activation of the STAT-1 pathway between rheumatoid tissues. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48(8):2132–2145.
  43. Walker JG, et al. Expression of Jak3, STAT1, STAT4, and STAT6 in inflammatory arthritis: unique Jak3 and STAT4 expression in dendritic cells in seropositive rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65(2):149–156.
  44. Tanaka Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of peficitinib (ASP015K) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to conventional DMARDs: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial (RAJ3). Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(9):1320–1332.
  45. Takeuchi T, et al. Efficacy and safety of peficitinib (ASP015K) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: results of a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (RAJ4) in Japan. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(9):1305–1319.
  46. Takeuchi T, et al. Efficacy and safety of the oral Janus kinase inhibitor peficitinib (ASP015K) monotherapy in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis in Japan: a 12-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75(6):1057–1064.
  47. Genovese MC, et al. Peficitinib, a JAK inhibitor, in combination with limited conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in the treatment of moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69(5):932–942.
  48. Van der Pouw Kraan TC, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis subtypes identified by genomic profiling of peripheral blood cells: assignment of a type I interferon signature in a sub-population of patients. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66(8):1008–1014.
  49. Higgs BW, et al. Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, myositis, rheumatoid arthritis and scleroderma share activation of a common type I interferon pathway. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(11):2029–2036.
  50. Wang J, Zhao Q. LncRNA LINC-PINT increases SOCS1 expression by sponging miR-155-5p to inhibit the activation of ERK signaling pathway in rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts induced by TNF-α. Int Immunopharmacol. 2020; 84:106497.
  51. Kivitz AJ, et al. Peficitinib, a JAK inhibitor, in the treatment of moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis in patients with an inadequate response to methotrexate. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69(4):709–719.
  52. Papp K, et al. A phase 2a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, sequential dose?escalation study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ASP015K, a novel Janus kinase inhibitor, in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2015;173(3):767–776.
  53. Sands BE, et al. Peficitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, in moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: results from a randomised, phase-2 study. J Crohns Colitis. 2018;12(10):1158–1169.
  54. Lauper K, et al. Effectiveness of TNF-inhibitors, abatacept, IL6-inhibitors and JAK-inhibitors in 31 846 patients with rheumatoid arthritis in 19 registers from the ‘JAK-pot’ collaboration. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022;81(10):1358–1366. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-222586.
  55. Westhovens R, et al. Filgotinib (GLPG0634/GS-6034), an oral JAK1 selective inhibitor, is effective in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and insufficient response to MTX: results from a randomised, dose-finding study (DARWIN 1). Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(6):998–1008.
  56. Vanhoutte F, et al. Efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of filgotinib, a selective JAK-1 inhibitor, after short-term treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: results of two randomised phase IIa trials. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69(9):1949–1959.
  57. Westhovens R, et al. Filgotinib in combination with methotrexate or as monotherapy versus methotrexate monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and limited or no prior exposure to methotrexate: the phase-3, randomised controlled FINCH 3 trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80(6):727–738.
  58. Chen C, et al. A highly selective JAK3 inhibitor is developed for treating rheumatoid arthritis by suppressing γc cytokine-related JAK-STAT signal. Sci Adv. 2022;8: eabo4363.
  59. Simon LS, Taylor PC, Choy EH, Sebba A, Quebe A, Knopp KL, Porreca F. The JAK/STAT pathway: A focus on pain in rheumatoid arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2021;51(2):278–284.
  60. Silver-Morse L, Li W X. JAK-STAT in heterochromatin and genome stability. JAKSTAT. 2013 Jul 1;2(3): e26090. doi: 10.4161/jkst.26090.
  61. Van Vollenhoven R F. Small molecular compounds in development for rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2013 May;25(3):391-7. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e32835fd828.
  62. Gremese E, Ferraccioli G. Tofacitinib for rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 2013 May 25;381(9880):1812. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61114-9.
  63. Yarilina A, Xu K, Chan C, et al. Regulation of inflammatory responses in tumour necrosis factor-activated and rheumatoid arthritis synovial macrophages by JAK inhibitors. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(12):3856-66. doi: 10.1002/art.37691.
  64. Burmester G R, Blanco R, Charles-Schoeman C, et al. Tofacitinib (CP-690,550) in combination with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013 Feb 9;381(9865):451-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61424-X.
  65. Mease P, Gladman D. Tofacitinib for Psoriatic Arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 22;378(8):775-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1715189.
  66. Hodge J A, Kawabata T T, Krishnaswami S, et al. The mechanism of action of tofacitinib – an oral Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016 Mar-Apr;34(2):318-28.
  67. Markham A. Baricitinib: First Global Approval. Drugs. 2017 Apr;77(6):697-704. doi: 10.1007/s40265-017-0723-3.
  68. Mitchell T S, Moots R J, Wright H L. Janus kinase inhibitors prevent migration of rheumatoid arthritis neutrophils towards interleukin-8, but do not inhibit priming of the respiratory burst or reactive oxygen species production. Clin Exp Immunol. 2017 Aug;189(2):250-8. doi: 10.1111/cei.12970.
  69. Murakami K, Kobayashi Y, Uehara S, et al. A Jak1/2 inhibitor, baricitinib, inhibits osteoclastogenesis by suppressing RANKL expression in osteoblasts in vitro. PLoS One. 2017 Jul 14;12(7): e0181126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181126.
  70. Liu C, Kieltyka J, Fleischmann R, Gadina M, O’Shea JJ. A decade of JAK inhibitors: What have we learned and what may be the future? Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021;73(12):2166–2178. doi:10.1002/art.41906
  71. Vincenti F, Tedesco Silva H, Busque S, et al. Randomized phase 2b trial of tofacitinib (CP-690,550) in de novo kidney transplant patients: efficacy, renal function and safety at 1 year. Am J Transplant. 2012;12(9):2446–2456. doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012. 04127.x
  72. Kremer JM, Bloom BJ, Breedveld FC, et al. The safety and efficacy of a JAK inhibitor in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIa trial of three dosage levels of CP-690,550 versus placebo. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(7):1895–1905. doi:10.1002/art.24567
  73. Fleischmann R. Recent issues in JAK inhibitor safety: perspective for the clinician. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2022;18(3):295–307. doi:10.1080/1744666X.2022.2039122
  74. Ytterberg SR, Bhatt DL, Mikuls TR, et al. Cardiovascular and cancer risk with tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(4):316–326. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2109927
  75. FDA requires warnings about increased risk of serious heart-related events, cancer, blood clots, and death for JAK inhibitors that treat certain chronic inflammatory conditions. Published December 2021.
  76. European Medicines Agency (EMA). Assessment Report: Xeljanz. EMA/CHMP/853224/2016. 2017.
  77. European Medicines Agency (EMA). Janus Kinase Inhibitors (JAKi) – EMA confirms measures to minimise risk of serious side effects with Janus kinase inhibitors for chronic inflammatory disorders. EMA/142279/2023. Published March 10, 2023.
  78. Smolen JS, Landewé RB, Bergstra SA, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2022 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;82(1):3–18. doi:10.1136/ard-2022-223356
  79. Lin CMA, Cooles FAH, Isaacs JD. Basic mechanisms of JAK inhibition. Mediterr J Rheumatol. 2020;31(Suppl 1):100–4. doi:10.31138/mjr.31.1.100.
  80. Angelini J, Talotta R, Roncato R, Fornasier G, Barbiero G, Dal Cin L, Brancati S, Scaglione F. JAK-Inhibitors for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Focus on the Present and an Outlook on the Future. Biomolecules. 2020;10(7):1002. doi:10.3390/biom10071002.
  81. Harrington R, Al Nokhatha SA, Conway R. JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: an evidence-based review on the emerging clinical data. J Inflamm Res. 2020; 13:519–531. doi:10.2147/JIR.S256216.
  82. Burmester GR, McInnes IB, Kremer J, et al. A randomised phase IIb study of mavrilimumab, a novel GM-CSF receptor α monoclonal antibody, in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(6):1020-1030. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210624.
  83. Weinblatt ME, McInnes IB, Kremer JM, et al. A randomized phase IIb study of mavrilimumab and golimumab in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018;70(1):49-59. doi:10.1002/art.40323.
  84. Sigidin YA, Loukina GV, Skurkovich B, et al. Randomized, double-blind trial of anti-interferon-γ antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol. 2001;30(4):203-207. doi:10.1080/030097401316909530.
  85. Senolt L. Emerging therapies in rheumatoid arthritis: focus on monoclonal antibodies. F1000Res. 2019; 8:1549. doi:10.12688/f1000research.18688.1.
  86. Namour F, Diderichsen PM, Cox E, Vayssière B, van der Aa A, Tasset C, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of filgotinib (GLPG0634), a selective JAK1 inhibitor, in support of phase IIB dose selection. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2015;54(8):859–874. doi:10.1007/s40262-015-0240-z.
  87. Galien R, Brys R, van der Aa A, et al. Absence of effects of filgotinib on erythrocytes, CD8+ and NK cells in rheumatoid arthritis patients brings further evidence for the JAK1 selectivity of filgotinib. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015; ACR Meeting Abstract 2781.
  88. Szekanecz Z, Buch MH, Charles-Schoeman C, Galloway J, Karpouzas GA, Kristensen LE, Ytterberg SR, Hamar A, Fleischmann R. Efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: update for the practising clinician. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2023;19(10):651–670. doi:10.1038/s41584-023-01063-3.
  89. Fleischmann R, Cutolo M, Genovese MC, Lee EB, Kanik KS, Sadis S, et al. Phase IIb study of oral tofacitinib (CP-690,550) or adalimumab versus placebo in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis on background methotrexate therapy. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(3):617–629. doi:10.1002/art.33383.
  90. Meyer DM, Jesson MI, Li X, Elrick MM, Funckes-Shippy CL, Warner JD, et al. Anti-inflammatory activity and neutrophil reductions mediated by the JAK1/JAK3 inhibitor CP-690,550 in rat adjuvant-induced arthritis. J Inflamm (Lond). 2010;7(1):41. doi:10.1186/1476-9255-7-41.
  91. Kremer JM, Bloom BJ, Breedveld FC, Coombs JH, Fletcher MP, Gruben D, et al. The safety and efficacy of a JAK inhibitor in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIa trial of CP-690,550. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60(7):1895–1905. doi:10.1002/art.24567.
  92. Dowty ME, Lin TH, Jesson MI, Hegen M, Martin DA, Katkade V, et al. Tofacitinib (CP-690,550): A potent and selective Janus kinase inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2014;348(1):165–173. doi:10.1124/jpet.113.209643.
  93. Fridman JS, Scherle PA, Collins R, Burn TC, Li Y, Li J, et al. Selective inhibition of JAK1 and JAK2 is efficacious in rodent models of arthritis: preclinical characterization of INCB028050. J Immunol. 2010;184(9):5298–5307. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0902819.
  94. Genovese MC, Kremer J, Zamani O, Ludivico C, Krogulec M, Xie L, et al. Baricitinib in patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(13):1243–1252. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1507247.
  95. Dougados M, van der Heijde D, Chen YC, Greenwald M, Drescher E, Liu J, et al. Baricitinib in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: efficacy and safety in clinical trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(9):1687–1693. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210502.
  96. Shi JG, Chen X, Lee F, Emm T, Scherle PA, Lo Y, et al. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of baricitinib, an oral JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;54(12):1354–1361. doi:10.1002/jcph.362.
  97. Strand V, Ahadieh S, French J, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of serious infections with tofacitinib and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015; 17:362.
  98. Winthrop KL. The emerging safety profile of JAK inhibitors in rheumatic disease. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2017;13(4):234–243.
  99. Harigai M. Growing evidence of the safety of JAK inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019;58(Suppl 1): i34–i42.
  100. Ishida M, Kuroiwa Y, Yoshida E, et al. Residual symptoms and disease burden among patients with rheumatoid arthritis in remission or low disease activity: a systematic literature review. Mod Rheumatol. 2018;28(5):789–799.
  101. Bechman K, Subesinghe S, Norton SA, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of infection risk with small molecule JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019;58(10):1755–1766.
  102. Olivera P, Lasa J, Bonovas S, et al. Safety of Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases or other immune-mediated diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(6):1554–1573.e12.
  103. Wollenhaupt J, Lee EB, Curtis JR, et al. Safety and efficacy of tofacitinib for up to 9.5 years in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: final results of a global, open-label, long-term extension study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21(1):89.
  104. Xie W, Huang Y, Xiao S, et al. Impact of Janus kinase inhibitors on risk of cardiovascular events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(8):1048–1054.
  105. Kerschbaumer A, Smolen JS, Nash P, Dörner T, Dougados M, Fleischmann R, et al. Points to consider for the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases with Janus kinase inhibitors: a systematic literature research. RMD Open. 2020;6(3): e001374. doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001374.
  106. Kraev K, Ivanova D, Angelov I, Kostova N, Stoyanova A, Sarafian V. Examining the safety profile of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in the management of immune-mediated diseases: a comprehensive review. Life (Basel). 2023;13(12):2244. doi:10.3390/life13122244.
  107. Yang V, Kragstrup TW, McMaster C, Reid P, Singh N, Haysen SR, Robinson PC, Liew DFL. Managing cardiovascular and cancer risk associated with JAK inhibitors. Drug Saf. 2023;46(11):1049-1071. doi:10.1007/s40264-023-01333-0.

Photo
Shital Devkar
Corresponding author

Tatyasaheb Kore College of Pharmacy, Warananager, Kolhapur-416113, Maharashtra, India

Photo
Shruti Sahekar
Co-author

Tatyasaheb Kore College of Pharmacy, Warananager, Kolhapur-416113, Maharashtra, India

Photo
Amol Sherikar
Co-author

Tatyasaheb Kore College of Pharmacy, Warananager, Kolhapur-416113, Maharashtra, India

Photo
Ajit Patil
Co-author

Tatyasaheb Kore College of Pharmacy, Warananager, Kolhapur-416113, Maharashtra, India

Shital Devkar*, Shruti Sahekar, Amol Sherikar, Ajit Patil, Harnessing JAK-STAT Pathway Insights in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Merging Molecular Mechanisms with Cutting-Edge Therapeutic Approaches, Int. J. Med. Pharm. Sci., 2026, 2 (2), 85-104. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18514439

More related articles
Comprehensive Review on Phytochemical Profile, Pha...
Akash Sarkar, Sudipta Santra, Sakasi Halder, Nilanjana Das, Babul...
The Invisible Saboteur: A Molecular Review of Dime...
Arnab Roy, Shivam Kashyap, Sha Chandankumar Manojkumar, Satyam Na...
Unlocking Synergistic Action: Harnessing Hybrid Dr...
Sanmey Pradhan, Yashvi Shah, Vineet Talele, Sujal Rathod...
Evaluation of Anti-Arthritic Activity of Aqueous Extract of Portulacaria Afra in...
Shivam Yadav, Satyam Yadav, Dr. Sandeep Jain, Dr. Bharat Kumar Taygi...
Mud Hybrid Butter Lipstick A Novel Approached to Hyperpigmentation...
Shashank Tiwari, Sarita Rawat, Preet Patel, Divyanshi Awasthi...
More related articles
Comprehensive Review on Phytochemical Profile, Pharmacological and Nutritional P...
Akash Sarkar, Sudipta Santra, Sakasi Halder, Nilanjana Das, Babul Raj...
The Invisible Saboteur: A Molecular Review of Dimethylmercury-Induced Neurotoxic...
Arnab Roy, Shivam Kashyap, Sha Chandankumar Manojkumar, Satyam Nath, Satish Kumar, Rohit Kumar Sharm...
Unlocking Synergistic Action: Harnessing Hybrid Drugs for Better Therapeutic Out...
Sanmey Pradhan, Yashvi Shah, Vineet Talele, Sujal Rathod...
Comprehensive Review on Phytochemical Profile, Pharmacological and Nutritional P...
Akash Sarkar, Sudipta Santra, Sakasi Halder, Nilanjana Das, Babul Raj...
The Invisible Saboteur: A Molecular Review of Dimethylmercury-Induced Neurotoxic...
Arnab Roy, Shivam Kashyap, Sha Chandankumar Manojkumar, Satyam Nath, Satish Kumar, Rohit Kumar Sharm...
Unlocking Synergistic Action: Harnessing Hybrid Drugs for Better Therapeutic Out...
Sanmey Pradhan, Yashvi Shah, Vineet Talele, Sujal Rathod...