We use cookies to ensure our website works properly and to personalise your experience. Cookies policy
1Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, MAM College of Pharmacy, Narasaraopet, Andhra Pradesh.
2Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, MAM College of Pharmacy, Narasaraopet, Andhra Pradesh.
3B. Pharm Student, MAM College of Pharmacy, Narasaraopet, Andhra Pradesh
This work proposed to develop and validate a reverse phase high-performance liquid chromatography method to measure dolutegravir in bulk and pharmaceutical formulations. In statistically organised trials, a number of method components, such as mobile phase ratio and column type, were changed to assess how these factors affected the chromatographic separation of dolutegravir. The separation was carried out at room temperature under isocratic conditions using Methanol: 0.05% OPA (pH 3.0) (68:32) at a flow rate of 0.8 mL/min on a Kromasil C18 (150 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm). A PDA detector was used to measure the maximum absorbance as 258 nm. While the run time was only five minutes, the retention time was 2.650 minutes. The calibration curve was linear in the concentration range of 2.5–15 μg/mL. The calculated LOQ of 0.24μg/mL and the measured LOD of 0.08μg/mL show how sensitive the new method is. The robustness and ruggedness of the method were validated by the %RSD being less than 2. The test percentage for formulation analysis was 99.30. This method was therefore widely used to evaluate Dolutegravir in bulk and pharmaceutical formulations.
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection is treated with Dolutegravir. Dolutegravir belongs to a group of drugs known as HIV integrase inhibitors. It functions by raising the quantity of immune cells that aid in the body's defence against infections and lowering the level of HIV in blood. [1] Dolutegravir is a second-generation HIV Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitor (INSTI). It stops the HIV virus from multiplying by binding to the active site of the viral enzyme integrase and blocking it, which prevents the virus from inserting its genetic material into the DNA of the host's CD4 immune cells. [2] Only a few analytical (limited to 50 mg only) and bioanalytical methods have been developed thus far for the determination of dolutegravir in bulk and pharmaceutical formulation. Dolutegravir's chemical structure [3] is shown in Figure 01.
Figure 01: The Chemical structure of Dolutegravir
MATEIALS AND METHODS
Chemicals and Reagents
The working standard drug Dolutegravir (99% purity) was obtained from Hetero Labs Limited, Hyderabad, Telangana. The formulation dosage form having brand name Tivicay PD 5 mg containing 5 mg of Dolutegravir, was purchased from local Pharmacy. HPLC grade Methanol, Water and Acetonitrile & Orthophosphoric acid (OPA) were purchased form Merk chemicals private limited, Mumbai.
Preparation of Mobile Phase
Methanol:0.05% OPA (68:32) at pH 3.0 was prepared. Before being utilised, the mobile phase was filtered through a 0.22 µm nylon filter after being sonicated for 15 minutes to eliminate dissolved gases.
Preparation of standard drug solution
Dolutegravir, 5 mg was weighed and transfer into a 10mL volumetric flask. It was then dissolved in 5 mL of methanol using a sonicator to make sure it was fully dissolved. The mixture was filtered using a 0.22 µm nylon filter. After that the volume in the flask was adjusted to 10 mL using methanol. This resulted in a stock solution that has 500 µg/mL of Dolutegravir. The stock solution of Dolutegravir was diluted to 50 µg/mL and then to 5µg/mL. The 5µg/mL of Dolutegravir were required for developing and validating a method.
Preparation of formulation solution
After carefully weighing ten Dolutegravir tablets (5 mg according to the label), they were ground into a fine powder. A 10 mL volumetric flask was filled with 5 mg of Dolutegravir tablet powder, the flask was filled with about 5 mL of methanol, and the mixture was sonicated for 15 minutes. After the solution had cooled to room temperature, the volume was adjusted using the same diluent. A sample stock solution of 500 µg/mL was prepared. A 0.22 µm nylon filter was used to filter the sample stock solution, and the first few ml of the filtrate were discarded. A working sample solution of 50 µg/mL was prepared by carefully pipetting 1.0 mL of the filtered sample stock solution into a 10 mL volumetric flask and diluting it to volume with the diluent. To reach the necessary concentration of 5 µg/mL for assay and validation testing, further dilutions were produced from the working sample solution using the same diluent.
METHOD DEVELOPMENT
Selection of Wavelength
The PDA detector was used to scan reference solutions containing 5μg/mL in order to choose an appropriate wavelength. The maximal wavelength obtained was found to be the optimal wavelength for the detection.
Table 01: Optimized Chromatographic Conditions
|
Parameter |
Condition |
|
Mobile Phase |
Methanol: 0.05% OPA (pH 3.0) (68:32) |
|
Column |
Kromasil C18 (150 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) |
|
Flow Rate |
0.8 ml/min |
|
Wavelength |
258nm |
|
Injection Volume |
10 µL |
|
Temperature |
Ambient |
|
Run time |
5 min |
Method Validation
In accordance with the ICH standards, the method's specificity, system appropriateness, LOD & LOQ, linearity, accuracy, precision, ruggedness, and robustness were all validated. Duplicate injections of the sample and standard solutions into the column were used for validation. [4,5]
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Method Development
Figure 02: UV Spectra of Dolutegravir
Figure 03: Optimized Chromatogram of Dolutegravir
Table 02: Results for Optimized Chromatogram
|
S.NO |
Drug |
Retention Time (min) |
Theoretical Plates |
Tailing Factor |
|
1 |
Dolutegravir |
2.650 |
6850 |
1.11 |
Method Validation
Specificity
No inference of diluent & Placebo
Figure 04: Chromatogram of Blank
Figure 05: Chromatogram of Placebo
Linearity
Table 03: Results for Linearity
|
S. No |
Level |
Dolutegravir |
|
|
Concentration in µg/mL |
Peak Area |
||
|
1 |
Level 1 |
2.5 |
54210 |
|
2 |
Level 2 |
5 |
108432 |
|
3 |
Level 3 |
7.5 |
162543 |
|
4 |
Level 4 |
10 |
216854 |
|
5 |
Level 5 |
12.5 |
271102 |
|
6 |
Level 6 |
15 |
325450 |
Figure 06: Linearity graph for Dolutegravir
LOD & LOQ
Dolutegravir 's LOD was found to be 0.08µg/mL, while its LOQ was determined to be 0.24µg/mL.
Precision
The system and method precision % RSD for dolutegravir were found to be 0.31 and 0.15, respectively. Both the system and method precision %RSDs fell within the permissible range of less than 2. As a result, the developed process was thought to be precisable.
Table 04: Results for Precision
|
S.NO |
Injection |
System Precision |
Method Precision |
||
|
|
|
Retention Time |
Peak Area |
Retention Time |
Peak Area |
|
1 |
Injection-1 |
2.647 |
107976 |
2.652 |
107684 |
|
2 |
Injection-2 |
2.650 |
108292 |
2.648 |
107359 |
|
3 |
Injection-3 |
2.656 |
107886 |
2.653 |
107760 |
|
4 |
Injection-4 |
2.649 |
107486 |
2.654 |
107832 |
|
5 |
Injection-5 |
2.655 |
107267 |
2.649 |
107476 |
|
6 |
Injection-6 |
2.652 |
107959 |
2.651 |
107593 |
|
Mean |
|
2.6515 |
107811 |
2.651167 |
107617.3 |
|
STD |
|
0.003202 |
338.5449 |
0.002115 |
162.3696 |
|
%RSD |
|
0.12 |
0.31 |
0.08 |
0.15 |
Accuracy
The recovery percentage was found to be between 98.40 and 99.60%. At 50%, 100%, and 150% spiking levels, the percentage RSD was determined to be within the permissible limit for dolutegravir. The results showed that the suggested method was accurate, with an acceptance limit of 98–102% and a percentage RSD of less than two.
Table 05: Results for Accuracy
|
Recovery Level |
Concentration in µg/ml |
Amount Found |
% Recovery |
% RSD |
||
|
Target |
Spiked |
Total |
||||
|
50% |
2.5 |
1.25 |
3.75 |
3.69 |
98.40 |
0.33 |
|
2.5 |
1.25 |
3.75 |
3.71 |
98.93 |
||
|
2.5 |
1.25 |
3.75 |
3.72 |
99.20 |
||
|
100% |
2.5 |
2.5 |
5.0 |
4.96 |
99.20 |
0.41 |
|
2.5 |
2.5 |
5.0 |
4.93 |
98.60 |
||
|
2.5 |
2.5 |
5.0 |
4.98 |
99.60 |
||
|
150% |
2.5 |
3.75 |
6.25 |
6.21 |
99.36 |
0.20 |
|
2.5 |
3.75 |
6.25 |
6.18 |
98.88 |
||
|
2.5 |
3.75 |
6.25 |
6.20 |
99.20 |
||
Ruggedness (Intermediate Precision)
%RSD of less than two is required to characterize ruggedness. In the developed approach, dolutegravir's %RSD was 0.23. The ruggedness of the method is confirmed by results that are within the allowed range.
Table 06: Results for Ruggedness
|
S. No |
Injection |
Retention Time |
Peak Area |
|
1 |
Injection-1 |
2.652 |
107939 |
|
2 |
Injection-2 |
2.649 |
107782 |
|
3 |
Injection-3 |
2.650 |
107867 |
|
4 |
Injection-4 |
2.656 |
108375 |
|
5 |
Injection-5 |
2.645 |
107597 |
|
6 |
Injection-6 |
2.655 |
108125 |
|
Mean |
|
2.651167 |
107947.5 |
|
STD |
|
0.003716 |
248.6817 |
|
%RSD |
|
0.14 |
0.23 |
Robustness
It was confirmed that the Dolutegravir percentage change using the developed approach was within the allowed range of less than 2. Thus, it was demonstrated that when the analytical conditions were significantly altered, the suggested approach was appropriate for the analysis of dolutegravir. This shows that the results are unaffected by even small changes to the analytical conditions.
Table 07: Results for Robustness
|
S. No |
Condition |
Dolutegravir |
|||
|
Retention Time |
Peak Area |
% Change |
|||
|
1 |
Standard |
2.650 |
108432 |
-- |
|
|
2 |
+MP (73:27) |
2.649 |
108312 |
0.11 |
|
|
3 |
-MP (63:37) |
2.651 |
108539 |
0.09 |
|
|
4 |
+Flow Rate 0.82ml/min |
2.648 |
108196 |
0.21 |
|
|
5 |
-Flow rate 0.78ml/min |
2.652 |
108575 |
0.13 |
|
|
%RSD |
|
0.06 |
0.15 |
|
|
Assay
Dolutegravir's test percentage in formulation analysis was 99.30%. As a result, it was demonstrated that the technique was appropriate for routine analysis of Dolutegravir in both bulk and formulation form.
Table 08: Results for Formulation
|
S. No |
Drug |
Brand |
Label Claim |
Peak Area |
Amount Found |
% Assay |
|
1 |
Dolutegravir |
Tivicay PD |
5 mg |
107682 |
4.965mg |
99.30 |
Figure 07: Chromatogram of Formulation
CONCLUSION
The HPLC measurement of dolutegravir in pharmaceutical formulations was not well documented in the literature priorly. A sensitive, accurate, and precise RP-HPLC method for assessing dolutegravir in bulk and pharmaceutical formulations has been developed. The recommended RP-HPLC method for the Dolutegravir was shown to be suitable for routine quantitative analysis following validation. The low standard deviation data show the exceptionally high precision of the new approach. The linearity, accuracy, specificity, and precision values were judged to be within reasonable boundaries. The chromatogram's lack of extra peaks showed that there was no conflict between the tablet's common excipients. Thus, it is shown that the revised RP-HPLC method is straightforward, linear, precise, sensitive, and reproducible. The new approach is therefore simple to use and offers a fast analytical time for routine quality monitoring of Dolutegravir in bulk and pharmaceutical formulations. The given findings demonstrate the high precision and accuracy of the suggested approach.
REFERENCES
Ramarao B.*, Prasada Rao M., Gayathri Devi K., Pathan Fakruddin, Sravanthi B., Naveen CH., Ramya Sri V., Saiful Islam, RP-HPLC Method Development and Validation for the Estimation of Dolutegravir In Bulk and Pharmaceutical Dosage Form, Int. J. Med. Pharm. Sci., 2026, 2 (5), 723-729. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20420790
10.5281/zenodo.20420790