We use cookies to ensure our website works properly and to personalise your experience. Cookies policy
1Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, MAM College of Pharmacy, Narasaraopet, Andhra Pradesh.
2Assistant Professor, Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, SS and N College of Pharmacy, Narasaraopet, Andhra Pradesh.
3MAM College of Pharmacy, Narasaraopet, Andhra Pradesh
This work developed and validated a reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography method for estimating sevabertinib in bulk and pharmaceutical formulations. In statistically planned studies, a number of method aspects were changed, such as mobile phase ratio and column type, to assess how these factors affected the chromatographic separation of sevabertinib. The separation was carried out on a Waters C18 Column (150 x 4.6 mm and 5µm) at room temperature under isocratic conditions at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min using 0.1% formic acid pH 2.8: Acetonitrile in a ratio of 40:60 (v/v). A PDA detector operating at 254 nm for a total of 8 minutes made the detection. Calibration curves were linear between 2.5 and 15 μg/mL. The calculated LOQ of 3.019μg/mL and the observed LOD of 1.138μg/mL show how sensitive the developed technique is. The %RSD being less than 2 validated the robustness and ruggedness of the approach. The assay % for formulation analysis was 98.90. Consequently, this method was frequently used to analyse sevabertinib in bulk and pharmaceutical formulations.
Sevabertinib is an oral, targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) used to treat adults with advanced, non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbouring HER2 (ERBB2) mutations. It is specifically approved for patients whose cancer has progressed after prior systemic therapy and is taken once or twice daily with food. [1-4] Till now no analytical method was reported for the estimation of Sevabertinib in bulk and pharmaceutical formulation. The Chemical structure of Sevabertinib is shown as Figure 01.
Figure 01: The Chemical structure of Sevabertinib
MATEIALS AND METHODS
Chemicals and Reagents
The working standard drug Sevabertinib (99.10% purity) & The formulation dosage form having brand name Hyrnuo containing 10 mg of Sevabertinib, were obtained from Zydus Life sciences Limited, Ahmedabad. HPLC grade Methanol, Water and Acetonitrile were purchased form Merk chemicals private limited, Mumbai. Formic acid used for the study were AR Grade and purchased from Merck Specialties Private Limited, Mumbai, India.
Preparation of Mobile Phase
Acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid (PH 2.8) were combined in a 40:60% v/v ratio. Before being used, the mobile phase was filtered through a 0.45 µm membrane filter after being sonicated for 15 minutes to eliminate dissolved gases
Preparation of standard drug solution
A 10 ml volumetric flask was filled with precisely weighed 10 mg of the standard sevabertinib. After that, an ultrasonicator was used to fully dissolve it in 5mL of acetonitrile. The solution was filtered using 0.45µm membrane filter paper after the final volume in the volumetric flask was adjusted using the same solvent. A standard stock solution of 1000 µg/mL was acquired. Using mobile phase as a diluent, the concentrations (10 µg/mL) needed for method development and validation parameters were made from the stock (1000 µg/mL) solution of sevabertinib.
Preparation of formulation solution
Twenty Sevabertinib tablets (label claim: 10 mg) were precisely weighed and ground into a fine powder. A 10 mL volumetric flask was filled with precisely weighed tablet powder equal to 10 mg of sevabertinib. To guarantee full drug extraction from the tablet matrix, around 7 mL of acetonitrile was added to the flask, and the mixture was sonicated for 15 minutes. After letting the solution cool to ambient temperature, the volume was adjusted using the same diluent. A sample stock solution with a concentration of 1000 µg/mL was obtained by thoroughly mixing the resultant solution. A 0.45 µm membrane filter was used to filter the sample stock solution, and the first few mL of the filtrate were discarded. To get a working sample solution of 100 µg/mL, 1.0 mL of the filtered sample stock solution was precisely pipetted into a 10 mL volumetric flask and diluted to volume with the diluent. To get the necessary 10 µg/mL concentration for assay and validation tests, further dilutions were prepared from the working sample solution using the same diluent.
Method Development
Selection of Wavelength
To select a suitable wavelength, the standard solutions of 10 μg /mL was prepared and scanned in the PDA detector. The obtained wavelength maximum was selected as suitable wavelength for the detection.
Table 01: Optimized Chromatographic Conditions
|
Parameter |
Condition |
|
Mobile Phase |
0.1% formic acid pH 2.8: acetonitrile and in the ratio of 40:60(v/v) |
|
Column |
Waters C18 Column (150 x 4.6 mm and 5µm) |
|
Flow Rate |
1.0 ml/min |
|
Wavelength |
254nm |
|
Injection Volume |
20 µL |
|
Temperature |
Ambient |
|
Run time |
8min |
Method Validation
In accordance with the ICH criteria, the method was validated in terms of specificity, system appropriateness, LOD & LOQ, linearity, accuracy, precision, ruggedness, and robustness. Replicate injections of the sample and standard solutions into the column were used to conduct validation. [5]
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Method Development
Figure 02: UV Spectra of Sevabertinib
Figure 03: Optimized Chromatogram of Sevabertinib
Table 02: Results for Optimized Chromatogram
|
S. No |
Drug |
Retention Time (min) |
Theoretical Plates |
Tailing Factor |
|
1 |
Sevabertinib |
4.512 |
4635 |
1.35 |
Method Validation
Specificity
No inference of diluent & Placebo
Figure 04: Chromatogram of Blank
Figure 05: Chromatogram of Placebo
Linearity
Table 03: Results for Linearity
|
S. No |
Level |
Sevabertinib |
|
|
Concentration in µg/mL |
Peak Area |
||
|
1 |
Level 1 |
2.5 |
75498 |
|
2 |
Level 2 |
5 |
153021 |
|
3 |
Level 3 |
7.5 |
231985 |
|
4 |
Level 4 |
10 |
310265 |
|
5 |
Level 5 |
12.5 |
396845 |
|
6 |
Level 6 |
15 |
475684 |
Figure 06: Linearity graph for Sevabertinib
LOD & LOQ
Sevabertinib's LOD was found to be 1.138µg/mL, while its LOQ was determined to be 3.019µg/mL.
Precision
Sevabertinib's system and method precision %RSD were determined to be 0.02 and 0.01, respectively. For both system and method precision, the %RSD was found to be within the acceptable level of less than 2. Thus, it was stated that the developed procedure was precise.
Table 04: Results for Precision
|
S.NO |
Injection |
System Precision |
Method Precision |
||
|
|
|
Retention Time |
Peak Area |
Retention Time |
Peak Area |
|
1 |
Injection-1 |
4.509 |
310286 |
4.503 |
314083 |
|
2 |
Injection-2 |
4.507 |
310291 |
4.513 |
314165 |
|
3 |
Injection-3 |
4.512 |
310370 |
4.506 |
314092 |
|
4 |
Injection-4 |
4.503 |
310195 |
4.512 |
314125 |
|
5 |
Injection-5 |
4.510 |
310292 |
4.510 |
314119 |
|
6 |
Injection-6 |
4.505 |
310265 |
4.509 |
314106 |
|
Mean |
|
4.507667 |
310283.2 |
4.508833 |
314115 |
|
STD |
|
0.003037 |
51.30113 |
0.003436 |
26.61453 |
|
%RSD |
|
0.07 |
0.02 |
0.075 |
0.01 |
Accuracy
It was shown that the recovery percentage ranged from 98.50 to 99.06%. The% RSD was determined to be within the acceptable limit for sevabertinib at 50%, 100%, and 150% spiking levels. With an acceptance limit of 98–102% and a percentage RSD of less than two, the results demonstrated the accuracy of the proposed method.
Table 05: Results for Accuracy
|
% Recovery |
Concentration in µg/ml |
Amount Found |
% Recovery |
% RSD |
||
|
Target |
Spiked |
Total |
||||
|
50% |
5 |
2.5 |
7.5 |
7.40 |
98.66 |
0.17 |
|
5 |
2.5 |
7.5 |
7.43 |
99.06 |
||
|
5 |
2.5 |
7.5 |
7.41 |
98.80 |
||
|
100% |
5 |
5 |
10 |
9.86 |
98.60 |
0.17 |
|
5 |
5 |
10 |
9.89 |
98.89 |
||
|
5 |
5 |
10 |
9.85 |
98.50 |
||
|
150% |
5 |
7.5 |
12.5 |
12.32 |
98.56 |
0.10 |
|
5 |
7.5 |
12.5 |
12.35 |
98.80 |
||
|
5 |
7.5 |
12.5 |
12.34 |
98.72 |
||
Ruggedness (Intermediate Precision)
The %RSD used to express ruggedness had to be less than 2. sevabertinib 's % RSD in the developed technique was 0.02 (Table 06). The method's robustness is confirmed by results that fall within the acceptable range.
Robustness
Sevabertinib's percentage change in the developed method was found to be within the acceptable range of less than 2. Consequently, it was shown that the recommended method was suitable for the analysis of sevabertinib when the analytical conditions were slightly changed. This demonstrates that even a small alteration to the analytical conditions has no impact on the outcomes (Table 07).
Assay
In formulation analysis, the assay percentage for sevabertinib was 98.90% (Table 08). The method was therefore shown to be suitable for the routine analysis of sevabertinib in both bulk and formulations drug.
Table 06: Results for Ruggedness
|
S.NO |
Injection |
Retention Time |
Peak Area |
|
1 |
Injection-1 |
4.511 |
314119 |
|
2 |
Injection-2 |
4.513 |
314123 |
|
3 |
Injection-3 |
4.509 |
314026 |
|
4 |
Injection-4 |
4.512 |
314130 |
|
5 |
Injection-5 |
4.509 |
314029 |
|
6 |
Injection-6 |
4.506 |
314006 |
|
Mean |
|
4.51 |
314072.2 |
|
STD |
|
0.002309 |
52.43223 |
|
%RSD |
|
0.51 |
0.02 |
Table 07: Results for Robustness
|
S. No |
Condition |
Sevabertinib |
|||
|
Retention Time |
Peak Area |
% Change |
|||
|
1 |
Standard |
4.512 |
310375 |
-- |
|
|
2 |
+MP (45:55) |
4.511 |
310326 |
0.01 |
|
|
3 |
-MP (35:65) |
4.513 |
310392 |
0.01 |
|
|
4 |
Flow Rate 1.2ml/min |
4.509 |
310309 |
0.01 |
|
|
5 |
Flow rate 0.8ml/min |
4.514 |
310402 |
0.01 |
|
|
%RSD |
|
0.04 |
0.01 |
|
|
Table 08: Results for Formulation
|
S. No |
Drug |
Brand |
Label Claim |
Peak Area |
Amount Found |
% Assay |
|
1 |
Sevabertinib |
Hyrnuo |
10 mg |
306852 |
9.89mg |
98.90 |
Figure 07: Chromatogram of Formulation
CONCLUSION
Before this study, there was no information available in the literature about the LC determination of sevabertinib in pharmaceutical formulations. The author has created a sensitive, precise, and accurate RP-HPLC method for measuring sevabertinib in bulk and pharmaceutical formulations. After validation, it was demonstrated that the suggested RP-HPLC method for the Sevabertinib test was appropriate for routine quantitative analysis. The HPLC approach eliminated the need for laborious extraction and saved time when preparing the standard and sample. The new method's extraordinarily high precision is demonstrated by the low standard deviation statistics. It was discovered that the values for linearity, accuracy, specificity, and precision fell within acceptable bounds. The absence of additional peaks in the chromatogram demonstrated that the tablet's common excipients did not conflict with one another. The developed RP-HPLC method is therefore demonstrated to be simple, linear, accurate, sensitive, and repeatable. For routine quality monitoring of Sevabertinib in pharmaceutical formulations and bulk, the developed method is therefore easy to use and has a quick analytical time. The provided results show that the recommended method has good accuracy and precision.
REFERENCES
Prasada Rao M., Narasimha Rao B. V.*, Udaya Krishna Veni A., Lavanya D., Ambika G., Manasa J., Dharshan M., Swetha M., RP-HPLC Method Development and Validation for The Estimation of Sevabertinib In Bulk and Pharmaceutical Dosage Form, Int. J. Med. Pharm. Sci., 2026, 2 (5), 641-647. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20388250
10.5281/zenodo.20388250